20+ Million Readerbase
PMC/PubMed Indexed Articles
Indexed In
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • CiteFactor
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Recommended Webinars & Conferences
Journal Flyer
Flyer image

Mini Review - (2015) Volume 4, Issue 2

The Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in Substance Use Disorders: An Overview

Umesh S1, Khess CRJ2*, Simlai J3 and Bose S4
1Department of Psychiatry, KS Mani Center for Cognitive Neurosciences and Department of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
2Department of Psychiatry, S.S. Raju Centre for Addiction Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
3Department of Psychiatry, Ranchi Institute of Neuropsychiatry and Allied Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
4Department of Psychiatry, Project HIFAZAT, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Khess CRJ, Director Professor of Psychiatry and Head S.S. Raju Centre for Addiction Psychiatry Central Institute of Psychiatry, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India, Tel: 0651 245 1115 Email:


“Substance use disorder” (SUD) is a common, chronic, remitting/relapsing group of psychiatric disorders having devastating effect not only on the individual but also impose socio-economic burden on their families and the society at large. They are often accompanied with numerous maladaptive behaviors and a persistent and compulsive, uncontrolled use of substance. Interestingly, they have moderate to high heritability and seem to be modulated by both genes and environment. Recent researches suggest that interactions of environmental and genetic factors designate the significance of epigenetic mechanisms, which have been found to occur in SUDs. This review makes an attempt to provide an overview regarding the various types of epigenetic modifications and their application in relation to SUDs.

Keywords: Epigenetics; Substance use disorder; DNA; Histones; Micro RNA


Substance use disorders are a group of psychiatric disorders influenced by various genetic, neurobiological, social and environmental factors. Researches have revealed that some common heritable genetic components may predispose an individual to substance dependence which is estimated to be as high as 20–50% [1]. However, researchers have also elucidated the inter-linked nature of genetic and environmental factors in order to clarify the idea that some specific biological factors and broader biosocial influences interact intricately to develop a predisposition or perpetuate substance abuse/ dependence [2]. Although unclear, the interactions between various genotypes and environmental influences point toward an important role for epigenetic mechanisms in drug dependence. Nevertheless, this epigenetic perspective can be a more novel and precise way of explaining the chronicity of psychiatric conditions including SUDs. So what do we mean by epigenetics? According to Jaenisch and Bird, epigenetics is broadly defined as “a series of biochemical processes through which changes in gene expression are achieved throughout the lifecycle of an organism without a change in DNA sequence” [3]. These changes can be immediate or delayed and may be passed on to daughter cells, or to successive generations through the process of cell division. In simpler terms, it is the vector through which environment interacts with an individual’s genome to determine all aspects of function and resilience in terms of health and disease (Figure 1). More specifically, covalent modifications of chromatin (DNA-histone protein complex), present in the cell nucleus is referred to as epigenetics. Epigenetic mechanisms perpetuate transient modulation as well as lasting variation in gene expression. The possible impact of the environment on epigenetic regulation has attracted substantial interest in researchers. Undoubtedly, a proportion of stress-exposed genetically vulnerable individuals do go on to develop SUDs which clearly represent low resilience factors and a high gene-environment interactions [4]. Stable epigenetic changes may become ideal mediators to produce changes in the functionality of the brain along with poor resilience factors for the development of substance use disorder.


Figure 1: This figure illustrates high genetic and environmental factors and poor resilience interplaying in substance use disorder.

Mechanism of Dependence

Substance abuse/dependence may be a resultant of impulsive→compulsive use of the substance. There are frequent episodes of abstinence which may/may not follow relapse. There are identifiable neurobiological mechanisms of dependence and much has been attributed to the abnormal reward circuitry. Drug-induced changes in gene expression in various brain reward systems, such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc), prefrontal cortex (PFC) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), represent one of the mechanism thought to contribute to dependence [5]. Changes in gene expression have been implicated in transition from chronic exposure to drug, to drug dependence; for example, increased transcription factor ΔFosB to several folds in the NAc is seen following chronic drug exposure and has been implicated in the transition to a dependent state [6]. Moreover, altered expression of specific genes, such as activator of G-protein signaling 3 (AGS3) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are involved in drug relapse in rodents [7]. Moreover, conditioned responses and an environmental context-dependency to the behavioral sensitization are also apparent. Chronic cocaine not only induces a variety of long-term biochemical and physiological effects, but also induces changes in the neurotransmitter GABA in the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) due to the modification in the dendritic spines. These GABAergic neurons have regulating effects on both glutamatergic neurons of pre- frontal cortex and dopaminergic neurons in the nucleus accumbens [8]. Hence, it appears that epigenetic mechanisms are regulated by substance abuse in brain’s reward regions and might contribute to drugrelated behaviours.

Epigenetic Regulation in SUDs

In many studies, environmentally induced changes in gene expression are associated with altered DNA methylation patterns or with altered histone modifications [9]. Interestingly, the possibility of an epigenetic contribution to psychiatric disorders, specifically schizophrenia, autism and substance use disorder has been increasingly focussed upon for an attractive molecular hypothesis.

Histone modification

The nucleotides of DNA in a mammalian genome have extraordinary degree of compactness and organization within the chromatin. The nuclear material is composed of DNA, histones and non-histone proteins [3]. The fundamental unit of chromatin is the nucleosome consisting of ~147 base pairs of DNA that are wrapped tightly (supercoiling) around a core histone octamer (two copies each of H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) (Figure 2). This highly condensed structure has control over gene expression, which occurs partly by gating the access of transcriptional activators to DNA [10]. The histone proteins assemble at one end called the carboxy (C) terminal to form the histone core, with the other end, in the amino (N)-terminal “tail” region, projecting out from the histone core. The post-translational histone modification occurs at the (N) terminal and includes acetylation, phosphorylation and methylation of histones. This diversity of histone modifications supports the “histone code hypothesis,” which hypothesizes that the sum of modifications at a particular gene defines a specific epigenetic state of gene activation or silencing [11]. Histone acetylation is catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases and reversed by histone deacetylases (HDACs), which generally drives a more permissive (open) state of chromatin and an increased gene expression. Histone methylation, catalyzed by histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and reversed by histone demethylases (HDMs), can either activate or repress gene transcription (increased or decreased gene expression) depending on the amino acid residue undergoing methylation. Histone acetylation and thus chromatin remodelling may regulate a protein called cyclic-AMP responsive–element-binding (CREB) protein. This protein helps modulate the transcription of certain genes by binding to a specific sequence on the DNA. Importantly, CREB binding protein is essential for both short-term and long-term memory formation and consolidation. CREB is involved in long-term memory formation, synaptic plasticity that has been associated with dependence. Alcoholinduced damage to nerve cells in the hippocampus and cerebellum has also been associated with decreased CREB functioning [12,13]. A wellestablished molecular model for long-term memory has been studied with a notion that the facilitatory neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT) activates the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) to phosphorylate CREB-binding protein (CBP) and phospho-CREB leads to the induction of two immediate early genes, C/EBP and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase, as well as several late effector genes including eEF1A and the RII subunit of PKA. In addition to serving as a scaffold protein in CREB promoter complexes, the recruited CBP also has intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity and can modify histones at promoters, resulting in the decondensation of DNA and thus enabling gene expression [14]. Interestingly, studies have often reported decrements in hippocampal BDNF caused by a repressive epigenetic mechanism involving trimethylation of histone H3K27 [15,16]. However, trimethylation of histone H3K27 cannot be reversed by antidepressant treatment despite increase in the hippocampal BDNF levels. Nonetheless, a lifelong persistence of the epigenetic marks related to stressors early in life is a likely mechanism for increased reactivity of animals and humans to subsequent stressors later in life. Early traumatic life experiences may exhibit life-long decrements in BDNF in the prefrontal cortex, based on increases in DNA methylation. Interestingly DNA methylation is also involved in cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in mice, and the sensitized response is again blocked by the methylation inhibitor zebularine [17]. Global H3 and H4 acetylation levels in the Nucleus accumbens (NAc) are increased after a single exposure to cocaine and remain elevated with chronic administration [18,19]. An acutely increased histone acetylation generally increases behavioural response to seek cocaine, a more sustained increases in acetylation may have attenuating effects on cocaine’s rewarding tendency. Moreover, acute, but not chronic, cocaine increases H4 acetylation at the c-Fos promoter and chronic cocaine increases H3 acetylation at the BDNF promoters in NAc (Table 1).


Figure 2: This figure illustrates nucleosome consisting of ~147 base pairs of DNA that are wrapped tightly (supercoiling) around a core histone octamer (two copies each of H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) [22]

Histone modifications Transcription effects noted
Acetylation Increased transcription
Methylation Increased/Decreased transcription
Phosphorylation Increased transcription

Table 1: Histone modifications and their effects on transcription.

DNA methylation

The DNA consists of four bases, guanine, cytosine, adenine and guanine. Researchers have focussed particularly on cytosine as it has been the best understood and the most stable epigenetic modification for regulating the transcriptional agility of mammalian genomes. DNA methylation is pertinent for epigenetics, as a methyl group is added to position 5 (Figure 3) of the cytosine pyrimidine ring in a reaction catalysed by a group of enzymes called DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). This occurs primarily but not always where a cytosine (C) occurs next to guanine (G) in the DNA sequence (CpG). The fundamental link between DNA methylation and the regulation of gene expression is demonstrated by the observed negative relationship between the level of promoter DNA methylation and the degree of expression of many genes [3]. The addition of a methyl group to CpG sites in the promoter regulatory regions of many genes displaces the binding of transcription factors and attracts a methyl-binding protein that initiates gene silencing. In particular, the methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2 protein) is important for the regulation of synaptic plasticity and dendritic spine maturation. This is an important protein, as newly methylated CpG islands influence transcription. Hence, DNA methylation plays a pivotal role in brain development, synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity in differentiated neurons [20]. In substance use disorder MeCP2 is important , because changes in MeCP2 in the nucleus accumbens have been shown to contribute to the neural and behavioural responses and they also can control BDNF expression and cocaine intake [21]. Cocaine self-administration also increases MeCP2 expression in the NAc and dorsal striatum, and increase drug intake under some conditions [21]. Its effects has been studied on BDNF expression as MeCP2 also helps in regulating alcohol’s addictive properties and BDNF expression is altered in various brain regions by acute and chronic exposure to alcohol [22].


Figure 3: This figure illustrates schematic representation of DNA methylation, which converts cytosine to 5’methyl-cytosine via the actions of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) (S-adenosylethionine (SAM) is the methyl group donor, which gets converted to S-adenosylhomocysteine.

Two possible mechanisms for the actions of MeCP2 in drug reward have been proposed. First, a reduction in MeCP2 prevents increase in the NAc dendritic spine density while increasing the number of GABAergic synapses. An increase in MeCP2 phosphorylation specifically in GABAergic interneurons in the NAc is also complemented to the above mechanism, which may regulate behavioural sensitization to substance use disorder. An alternative model suggests that MeCP2 represses the transcription of specific microRNAs (see below), resulting in reduced repression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which is also a target for CREB. BDNF has previously been described to promote cocaine self-administration [23]. Although these models are not mutually exclusive, further work is necessary to integrate them with our growing understanding of the multiple brain regions and cell types that are involved in reward behaviours.

Role of micro RNA (miRNA)

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) comprise of species of short noncoding RNA which regulate post transcriptional gene expression. Recent studies have demonstrated that epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation and histone modification, not only regulate the expression of protein-encoding genes, but also miRNAs. Conversely, another subset of miRNAs controls the expression of important epigenetic regulators, including DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases. This complicated network of feedback between miRNAs and epigenetic pathways appears to form an epigenetics–miRNA regulatory circuit to organize the whole gene expression profile. When this regulatory circuit is disrupted, normal physiological functions are interfered with, contributing to various disease processes [24]. miRNAs control gene expression by interfering with the intricate processes of mRNA translation into a protein product and mRNA degradation. Researchers have found that substance dependence is associated with both up and down regulation of miRNAs mimicking the direction of each of these changes affecting the reward circuitry. It has also been implicated in gene regulation and synaptic plasticity [25]. Several genes implicated in addiction models such as ΔFosB, dopamine transporter, and glutamate receptor subunits, have also been related to drug-triggered alterations in specific miRNAs [26]. Moreover, miRNAs are altered in NAc after chronic cocaine use [27]. However, extensive researches on miRNA affected by chronic substance intake and its relationship have yet to be elucidated.

What is mito-epigenetics?

Mitochondria contain their own circular DNA that encodes for proteins, transfer RNAs, ribosomal RNAs and also non-coding RNAs. Mitochondrial DNA is particularly important as it produces and regulates formation of the reactive oxygen species (ROS). Moreover, production of ROS at mitochondria integrates cellular energy state, concentration of metabolites in the neurons and other upstream signaling events. These have important implications in cellular stress signaling, maintenance of stem cell populations and even cellular survival [28]. In fact, addictive drugs enhance ROS production and generate oxidative stress that in turn alters mitochondrial and nuclear gene expressions [29]. Very recently, an epigenetic focus has been directed towards mitochondria and evidence indicates that mitochondria are involved in epigenetic regulation of nuclear genome including the methylation status of mitochondrial genome [30,31]. The complex transcription and epigenetic regulation of mtDNA induced by addictive substances in the brain have received very little attention and requires in-depth exploration.

The Way Forward

Based on the current researches it is evident that there is an exponential growth of epigenetic research to understand the mechanisms underlying substance use disorder and their related behaviors. However, the major limitations in such researches are that they are conducted on rats and precise research on human subjects may require post-mortem human brain tissue. This is because epigenetic changes are often tissue or cell specific and thus most likely to be apparent in the brain areas in which addiction is primarily manifested. Unfortunately, the low and middle economic countries do not possess high-quality postmortem brain samples that have been well characterized for substance dependence. Additionally, very little is known about how factors such as age, sex and environmental exposure influence epigenetic patterns, which requires proper matching of subjects. Despite the fact, much is anticipated in the future with regards to epigenetics in psychiatric disorders and more specifically SUDs.


  1. Kendler KS, Schmitt E, Aggen SH, Prescott CA (2008) Genetic and environmental influences on alcohol, caffeine, cannabis, and nicotine use from early adolescence to middle adulthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 674-682.
  2. Nielsen DA,Utrankar A, Reyes JA, Simons DD, Kosten TR (2012) Epigenetics of drug abuse: predisposition or response. Pharmacogenomics 13: 1149-1160.
  3. Jaenisch R, Bird A (2003) Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 33 Suppl: 245-254.
  4. Enoch MA (2011) The role of early life stress as a predictor for alcohol and drug dependence.  Psychopharmacology (Berl) 214: 17-31.
  5. Koob G,Kreek MJ (2007) Stress, dysregulation of drug reward pathways, and the transition to drug dependence. Am J Psychiatry 164: 1149-1159.
  6. Kelz MB, Chen J, Carlezon WA Jr, Whisler K, Gilden L, et al. (1999) Expression of the transcription factor deltaFosB in the brain controls sensitivity to cocaine. Nature 401: 272-276.
  7. Renthal W,Nestler EJ (2008) Epigenetic mechanisms in drug addiction. Trends Mol Med 14: 341-350.
  8. Post RM,Kalivas P (2013) Bipolar disorder and substance misuse: pathological and therapeutic implications of their comorbidity and cross-sensitisation. Br J Psychiatry 202: 172-176.
  9. Feil R,Fraga MF (2012) Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet 13: 97-109.
  10. Li B, Carey M, Workman JL (2007) The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128: 707-719.
  11. Jenuwein T, Allis CD (2001) Translating the histone code.  Science 293: 1074-1080.
  12. Acquaah-Mensah GK,Misra V, Biswal S (2006) Ethanol sensitivity: a central role for CREB transcription regulation in the cerebellum. BMC Genomics 7: 308.
  13. Crews FT, Nixon K (2009) Mechanisms of neurodegeneration and regeneration in alcoholism. Alcohol Alcohol 44: 115-127.
  14. Guan Z,Giustetto M, Lomvardas S, Kim JH, Miniaci MC, et al. (2002) Integration of long-term-memory-related synaptic plasticity involves bidirectional regulation of gene expression and chromatin structure. Cell 111: 483-493.
  15. Bredy TW, Wu H, Crego C, Zellhoefer J, Sun YE, et al. (2007) Histone modifications around individual BDNF gene promoters in prefrontal cortex are associated with extinction of conditioned fear. Learn Mem 14: 268-276.
  16. Tsankova N,Renthal W, Kumar A, Nestler EJ (2007) Epigenetic regulation in psychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci 8: 355-367.
  17. Roth TL,Lubin FD, Funk AJ, Sweatt JD (2009) Lasting epigenetic influence of early-life adversity on the BDNF gene. Biol Psychiatry 65: 760-769.
  18. Kumar A, Choi KH, Renthal W, Tsankova NM, Theobald DE, et al. (2005) Chromatin remodeling is a key mechanism underlying cocaine-induced plasticity in striatum. Neuron 48: 303-314.
  19. Schroeder FA, Penta KL, Matevossian A, Jones SR, Konradi C, et al. (2008) Drug-induced activation of dopamine d(1) receptor signaling and inhibition of class i/ii histone deacetylase induce chromatin remodeling in reward circuitry and modulate cocaine-related behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology33: 2981-2992.
  20. Feng J, Zhou Y, Campbell SL, Le T, Li E, et al. (2010) Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons. Nat Neurosci 13: 423-430.
  21. Im HI, Hollander JA, Bali P, Kenny PJ (2010) MeCP2 controls BDNF expression and cocaine intake through homeostatic interactions with microRNA-212. Nat Neurosci 13: 1120-1127.
  22. Starkman BG,Sakharkar AJ, Pandey SC (2012) Epigenetics-beyond the genome in alcoholism. Alcohol Res 34: 293-305.
  23. Robison AJ,Nestler EJ (2011) Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addiction. Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 623-637.
  24. Sato F, Tsuchiya S, Meltzer SJ, Shimizu K (2011) MicroRNAs and epigenetics. FEBS J 278: 1598-1609.
  25. Siegel G, Saba R, Schratt G (2011) microRNAs in neurons: manifold regulatory roles at the synapse. CurrOpin Genet Dev 21: 491-497.
  26. Chandrasekar V, Dreyer JL (2011) Regulation of mir-124, let-7d, and mir-181a in the accumbens affects the expression, extinction, and reinstatement of cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. Neuropsychopharmacology36: 1149-1164.
  27. Eipper-Mains JE,Kiraly DD, Palakodeti D, Mains RE, Eipper BA, et al. (2011) microRNA-Seq reveals cocaine-regulated expression of striatal microRNAs. RNA 17: 1529-1543.
  28. Hamanaka RB,Chandel NS (2010) Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species regulate cellular signaling and dictate biological outcomes. Trends BiochemSci 35: 505-513.
  29. Streck EL,Gonçalves CL,Furlanetto CB,Scaini G, Dal-Pizzol F, et al. (2014) Mitochondria and the central nervous system: searching for a pathophysiological basis of psychiatric disorders. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 36: 156-167.
  30. Minocherhomji S,Tollefsbol TO, Singh KK (2012) Mitochondrial regulation of epigenetics and its role in human diseases. Epigenetics 7: 326-334.
  31. Shock LS,Thakkar PV, Peterson EJ, Moran RG, Taylor SM (2011) DNA methyltransferase, cytosine methylation, and cytosine hydroxymethylation in mammalian mitochondria. ProcNatlAcadSci USA 108: 3630-3635.
Citation: Umesh S, Khess CRJ, Simlai J, Bose S (2015) The Role of Epigenetic Mechanisms in Substance Use Disorders: An Overview. Hereditary Genet 4:149.

Copyright: © 2015 Umesh S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.