Research Article - (2016) Volume 7, Issue 2

Polymeric Proteins Formation During Pasta-making with Einkorn (Triticum monococcum) and Semolina Mixtures and Effects on Cooking Behaviour and Acceptability

Agnello PD, Landriscina L, Schiavulli A and Lamacchia C*
Department of Science of Agriculture, Food and Environmental, University of Foggia, Via Napoli, 25-71122 Foggia, Italy
*Corresponding Author: Lamacchia C, Università degli Studi di Foggia, Via Napoli, 25-71122 Foggia, Italy, Tel: +39- 0881-589-125 Email:

Abstract

Pasta was produced in a pilot plant from semolina and semolina blended with increasing amounts of einkorn flour. According to size exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC), einkorn proteins interact with semolina proteins during pasta making, forming polymers of high molecular weight. Of these, the unextractable polymeric proteins (UPP) of pasta replaced with 50% einkorn were at significantly higher concentrations than in pasta made from semolina. The increase of S-S bonds and the decrease of –SH free groups in 50% einkorn pasta, with respect to that made of semolina, suggested that polymerization among the different class of proteins happen mainly through disulphide bonds. A decrease in stickiness and an increase in firmness in 50% einkorn pasta corresponded to the formation of large and insoluble protein aggregates.

Keywords: Triticummonococcumpasta, Polymericproteins, SEHPLC, Cookingquality

Introduction

Einkorn wheat (Triticum monoccoccum ssp. monococcum) is ancient diploid (AA) wheat, which originated about 10,000 years ago and represents one of the ancestors of the modern polyploid wheat’s [1]. Presently einkorn wheat is cultivated only marginally in the Mediterranean area [1] but there is a renewed interest in this crop due to growing sensibility of the public opinion for dietetic-nutritional aspects, probably influenced by preliminary results which provided that an excellent flour composition may have a significant role in the prevention of pathologies such as cancer, diabetes and chronic inflammatory diseases. Indeed, einkorn wheat has high protein, carotenoid, tocol [2], micro-element [3], resistant starch and fiber [4] content. Therefore it has been proposed as a promising candidate for the development of new foods such as bakery products, baby food or enriched foods [5]. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of its genome einkorn wheat has attracted the interest of the scientific community on nutritional and health aspects in relation to celiac disease. If we consider in fact, that for each genome (AA, BB, DD) there are dozens of genes coding for prolamins in wheat caryopses, it is evident that in einkorn flour the mere presence of the AA genome encodes for a reduced variety of gluten proteins (and of potential immune toxic peptides). Recent evidence shows that prolamins of some einkorn flour cause a reduced inflammatory effect in celiac patients [6-9], articularly for the inability to activate the branch of immune cells [6], or to induce apoptosis of enterocytes [10]. The search of naturally detoxified, or less toxic, ancient grains is of great interest for their potential use in the general diet to prevent disease in those individual at high risk to develop gluten intolerance.

In contrast to nutritional and health advantages, the dough, bread making and pasta making quality of einkorn has been described to be poor in comparison to common wheat [11,12].

From a technological point of view, the exclusive use of semolina durum wheat ensures some desirable parameters in cooked pasta, such as good texture, resistant to surface disintegration, and retention of a firm structure [13]. Thus the replacements of semolina present a major technological challenge.

Compared to common wheat, einkorn flours are characterized, by an extreme imbalance of gliadins and glutenins and by very low amounts of HMW-GS [14]. With respect to single gluten protein types, einkorn is deficient of an entire group of γ-gliadins, which are present in all other wheat species [15]. In contrast to common wheat, the bread quality of einkorn flour is not influenced by the content of total gluten proteins, whereas other parameters such as glutenin content and the ratio of gliadins to glutenins are as important as for common wheat [14].

From a commercial point of view and despite the growing interest in the health aspects of einkorn food products, good sensory properties still remain a key priority as a consumer choice criterion. The challenge is to find einkorn-semolina formulations and processing suitable to give pasta having pleasant sensory properties, in order to meet the consumer’s acceptance though it is to be considered that durum wheat’s differ in the quantity and quality of gluten and thus various durum wheat semolinas may tolerate the addition of einkorn to varying degrees.

The aim of the paper was to study the effect of the replacement of semolina with increasing amount of einkorn flour on pasta protein polymers, by size-exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC), in order to gain a better understanding of possibly interactions at the molecular level. In addition, similarities and differences in changes in protein structure between pasta replaced with increasing amount of einkorn flour and their relationship to cooking behavior were also evaluated.

Experimental

Pasta samples

Blends of durum wheat semolina and blends of einkorn (Triticum monococcum) whole flour were supplied by De Vita mill (Casalnuovo Monterotaro, Foggia, Italy) and Sobrino mill (La Morra, Cuneo, Italy), respectively.

The durum wheat semolina was of the type commonly employed for pasta production (particle size distribution: 15% <200 μm; 200 μm <30% <300 μm; 300 μm <50% <400 μm; 5% >400 μm). The einkorn flour had a granulometry <250 μm. Macaroni were produced at Belladauna pasta factory, (Candela, Foggia, Italy) using a 10-Kg pilot plant (Italpast, Parma) equipped with a mixer and an extruder, by mixing the flours with tap water, at 41°C, in order to obtain a final water content of 28-31% in each dough. This water content was obviously obtained by adding different amounts of water as a function of the percentage of semolina replaced by einkorn. Increasing einkorn flour levels just determined a slightly decrease of dough firmness and an increase of stickiness but these changes did not significantly affect the pasta-making procedure that was performed in the same conditions (temperature 50 ± 5°C; kneading time 15 min; vacuum degree 700 mmHg) independently upon formulation with the exception of the pressure that ranged between 60 and 125 atm as a function of the specific dough composition. A Bronze die-plate was used. Macaroni were dried at 55°C for 12 h. This temperature was applied from the beginning to the end of the drying cycle and then pasta was equilibrated to room conditions. The relative humidity of the hot air was in the 68% range. Four kinds of macaroni were produced: a control made of 100% durum wheat semolina and pasta where 30, 50 and 100% of durum wheat semolina was replaced with einkorn flour (30% einkorn pasta; 50% einkorn pasta; 100% einkorn pasta). The pasta-making procedure was repeated three times.

Chemical composition of flours

Total protein, gluten and fiber content of raw material samples were determined by using the standard AACC methods (AACC, 2000). Total starch content was determined with an enzymatic assay kit (Megazyme, Co. Wicklow, Ireland). Quality of gluten was determined by Glutomatic according to the standard method AACC (AACC, 2000). Analyses were conducted in triplicate.

SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis) analysis

Total proteins from samples (1g) were extracted using 10 ml of an extraction buffer containing Tris-HCl 0.0625 M pH 6.8, SDS 2%, Glycerol 10% (v/v), Dithiotreitol (DTT) 1.5% (w/v). Flour samples were left in contact with the extraction buffer for 2 h, and then they were centrifuged at 9500 rpm for 15 min at 10°C. The supernatants, containing proteins, were carefully removed and stored at -20°C until the use. Single protein fractions (albumins/globulins, gliadins and glutenins) from flours (1g) were extracted using the Osborne sequential extraction [16]. To separate the extracted proteins, SDSPAGE was performed on a 12.5% gel under reducing conditions, using a horizontal electrophoresis system Hoefer SE 600, (GE Healthcare, Milan, Italy). SDS-PAGE analysis was carried out at 25 mA for 3 h at room temperature. The gels were stained with 0.25% w/v Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) overnight.

Extraction and fractionation of proteins

Proteins from semolina, einkorn flour and milled macaroni samples were extracted following the method of Gupta and others [17]. The macaroni were milled at a granulometry included within 200 and 350 μm. Soluble proteins from 10 mg of samples were extracted with 1 ml 0.5% SDS-phosphate buffer (pH 6.9); the suspension was shaken for 30 minutes and the solubilised protein (“soluble” protein) was recovered by centrifugation for 10 minutes.

The resulting residues were extracted with 1ml 0.5% SDSphosphate buffer (pH 6.9) by sonication for 15s (Microson Ultrasonic cell distributor), ensuring that the samples were completely dispersed within the first 5s and then heated to 35°C for 30 minutes. The supernatants after centrifugation (10 min at 17,000 g) were termed “unextractable” proteins (“insoluble” protein). Total proteins (10 mg) were extracted in 1 ml of the same buffer, vortexed, sonicated for 30 seconds and supernatants (“total” protein) were recovered for SEHPLC analysis. All extracts were filtered through a 0.45 μm PVDF filter prior to be injected on column.

SE-HPLC analysis

SE-HPLC was performed using a LC 10 AD Shimadzu HPLC system (Shimadzu corporation, Kyoto, Japan) and Phenomenex Biosep SEC S-4000 column (300 × 7.8 mm, Phenomenex, Torrence, CA, USA).

Each sample (20 μl) was injected on the column and the eluted proteins were monitored at 214 nm. Three replicates of each samples were used for the investigation of protein composition. The mobile phase was 50% acetonitrile containing 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid with a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min. The SE-HPLC column was calibrated using protein standards with a range of molecular weights kDa as follows: ribonuclease A (13.7), chymotripsinogen (25.0), ovalbumin (43.0), bovine serum albumin (67.0), aldolase (158), catalase (232), ferritin (440) and thyroglobulin (669).

The percentage of unextractable polymeric protein (UPP) was calculated as described by Gupta and others [17]. Briefly, the percentage of total UPP was calculated as [peak 1 + 2 area (unextractable)/peak 1 + 2 area (total)] × 100. Peak 1 + 2 area (total) refers to the total of peak 1 + 2 (extractable) and peak 1 + 2 (unextractable) [18].

Determination of SH and S-S groups

The protein disulfide and sulphydryl content in the flours and pasta samples was estimated by a colorimetric determination of free SH groups, using a solid phase assay NTSB2-, according to the method of Chan and Wasserman [19].

Statistical analysis

The results were compared by one-way variance analysis (ANOVA). A Duncan’s multiple range test, with the option of homogeneous groups (p<0.05), was used to determine significance between samples. STATISTICA 7.1 for Windows (StatSoft, Inc, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used for this purpose.

Results

Chemical composition and technological properties of durum wheat semolina and einkorn flour

Durum wheat semolina contains two major components, starch (67%) and proteins (14.30%), and minor components such as lipids and fibers (Table 1). Gliadins (alcohol-soluble) and glutenins (acid/ alkali-soluble) represent 87% of total proteins vs. 13% for albumins (water-soluble) and globulins (salt-soluble). Compared with durum wheat semolina, einkorn flour contains higher amount of proteins (15.66%), fiber (8.2%) and lipids (2.5%) and lower amounts of starch (60.2%) and gluten proteins (5.57%).

Durum wheat semolina gluten proteins were characterized by a high gluten index value indicating very good attitude of these proteins to form a strong network in dough and consequently in pasta. In comparison, einkorn flour shows a lower value of gluten index in accordance with its low amount of gluten proteins (35% of total proteins vs. 66% of albumins and globulins) (Table 1).

Effect of the replacement of semolina with einkorn (Triticum monococcum) flour on pasta protein fractions

To study differences in protein composition and for a better understanding of the effect of different formulation on pasta protein polymers, durum wheat semolina, einkorn flour and different types of pasta protein fractions were detected as CBB-stained bands on SDSPAGE obtained under reducing conditions. Figure 1 shows protein fractions of durum wheat semolina and einkorn flour (Figure 1A) and composite pasta (Figure 1B). Semolina and einkorn flour show several protein bands with a molecular weight included between 100 e 10 kDa. High molecular weight bands (included between 90 and 116 kDa) are represented by High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits (HMW-GS), but also by high molecular weight globulin and ω-gliadins. Bands with molecular weight included between 67 and 10 kDa contain mainly Low Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits (LMW-GS), gliadins (α, β e γ) and low molecular weight globulin and albumins. Differences between the two Triticum species can be noticed observing gliadin and glutenin profiles. In particular, considering, the glutenin electrophoretic pattern, a classification of these polymeric prolamins, in four groups (A, B, C, D,), on the basis of their electrophoretic mobility, after disulphide bonds (S-S) reduction, was possible. The A group (with a molecular weight included between 80,000-120,000 Da) corresponds to HMWGS [20]. Within this group is possible make a further distinction in x type-HMW (with a higher molecular weight) and y type-HMW (lower molecular weight) glutenin subunits. The B group (42,000-51,000 Da) corresponds to B-type Low Molecular Weight termed typical LMWGS, and the C group (30,000-40,000 Da) to the LMW-GS whose aminoacid sequences is similar to those of γ- and α-gliadins [20].

food-processing-technology-separation

Figure 1A: SDS-PAGE separation of durum wheat semolina and einkorn flour proteins under reducing conditions. Lane 1:einkornflour total proteins; lane 2: durum wheat semolina total proteins; lane 3: einkorn flour albumin and globulin proteins; lane 4: durum wheat semolina albumin and globulins proteins; lane 5: einkorn flour glutenin proteins; lane 6: durum wheat semolina glutenin proteins; lane 7: einkorn flour gliadin protein; lane 8: durum wheat semolina gliadin proteins; M: molecular marker.

Finally, D group, (about 80,000-60,000 Da) also belongs to LMWGS, with highly acidic amino acid sequence very similar to ω-gliadins ones [21]. It is possible to observe that in the A group (HMW-GS) both einkorn flour (lane 5) and semolina (lane 6) show a band whose molecular weight is included between 200 and 97 kDa, and that the einkorn HMW-GS band has a molecular weight greater than that present in semolina. The x-type subunits typically have a slower electrophoretic mobility in SDS-PAGE and, hence, a molecular weight higher than the y-type subunits.

For comparison with data in the literature [22] is thus apparent that einkorn flour used in this study contains a 1A × 1 glutenin subunit and semolina a 1B × 7 one [23]. The semolina HMW-GS 1Bx7 is correlated to good technological performance [23] and this would be in agreement with its gluten index value (Table 1).

Samples Water content % Ashes % Proteins % Dry gluten % Total fiber % Starch % Gluten Index1-100
Durum wheat semolina 14.95a 0.84a 14.30a 12.50A 1.5A 67a 80A
Einkorn flour 11.26b 2.08b 15.66b 5.57B 8.2B 60.2b 60B

A, B = ρ < 0.001
a, b = ρ < 0.05

Table 1: Chemical composition and gluten strength of einkorn flour and durum wheat semolina.

Even for what concerns the einkorn flour, the Payne and others [24] classification, shows that the 1Ax1 subunits good for the quality of the final product. Therefore, the low Gluten Index value (60) reported in Table 1 would be more likely due to the low amount of gluten proteins present in einkorn flour that to the HMW-GS quality. In addition to the HMW-GS, an important role has also determined by LMW-GS and gliadins.

Glutenin electrophoretic profile evidences higher amount of B-type LMW-GS, with respect to the other types (LMW-D and -C), in semolina than einkorn that, instead, show a higher intensity of the C-type LMW-GS bands. The B-type LMW-GS are related to the good performance of wheat flour as they act as chain extenders of the polymers that are formed [25], thanks to their ability to form two intermolecular disulfide bonds. It is, however, well known that the C-type LMW-GS, are the terminator s of the polymer chain that are form in gand this is due to the presence of a single cysteine residue available to form intermolecular disulfide bridges [26].

Considering, instead, the gliadin pattern, on the basis of their electrophoretic mobility are recognizable: cysteine (S-) poor monomeric prolamins termed ω-gliadins (molecular weight of about 80 kDa), followed by S-rich monomeric prolamins, γ-gliadins (45-30 kDa), β-gliadins (30-14 kDa) and α-gliadins (14-10 kDa). Within the four groups of gliadins it is possible to observe significant differences between semolina (lane 8) and einkorn flour (lane 7). In particular, einkorn flour ω-gliadins show numerous bands with respect to that of semolina ones and also a higher molecular weight in accordance with Wieser and others [14]; γ-gliadins are more numerous in semolina than einkorn, which is deficient of an entire group of this type of proteins [14] and dominated instead by β-gliadins. With regard to the α-gliadins, it is interesting to note that the einkorn flour present a single bands than the four shown in the semolina profile.

Very interesting it is also the albumin/globulin einkorn flour profile (lane 3) which shows protein bands with an higher intensity with respect to durum wheat semolina (lane 4) in accordance with its chemical composition (section 6.1). In addition, the einkorn flour albumin/globulin pattern shows high molecular weight protein bands (between 200 and 80 kDa) which are not all detectable in durum wheat semolina profile.

In Figure 1B the electrophoretic profile of the different types of pasta are represented. Pasta made with 100% semolina (lane 3) and 100% einkorn flour (lane 4) show a protein pattern similar to that of the respective flours (lane 1, semolina and lane 2, einkorn) both in terms of amount and intensity of bands. Although, differences in the ω-gliadins pattern can be inferred passing from 100% einkorn flour to its respective pasta that shows the absence of one of these protein bands. Composite pasta produced replacing semolina with einkorn flour (lane 5, 30% einkorn pasta; and lane 6, 50% einkorn pasta) show hybrid protein profiles between that of semolina and einkorn flour and the presence of both1Bx7 and the 1Ax1 HMW-GS. Furthermore, it is possible to note that the protein bands intensity of composite pasta vary concurrently to the percentage and type of flour added and as for the 100% einkorn pasta, the composite one do not show the presence of the einkorn flour ω-gliadin bands, suggesting the possibility that these proteins may undergo to a self-assembling by hydrophobic bonds at the temperature of 50-60°C, forming structure with molecular weight higher than 200 kDa. It is note of worthy that the protein profile of pasta containing 50% of einkorn flour (lane 6) show a total decrease of bands intensity compared to the other typologies of pasta, suggesting the formation, in this pasta, of larger protein aggregates (with a molecular weight realistically higher than 250 kDa) involving different class of proteins as previously demonstrated by Lamacchia and others [27-28].

food-processing-technology-pasta-proteins

Figure 1B: SDS-PAGE separation of semolina-einkorn pasta proteins under reducing conditions. Lanes 1: durum wheat semolina total proteins; lanes 2: einkorn flour total proteins; lanes 3: 100%-semolina pasta total proteins; lanes 4: 100%-einkorn pasta total proteins; lanes 5-6: pasta proteins with increasing amount of einkorn flour (30% and 50%, respectively); M: molecular marker.

Effect of the replacement of semolina with einkorn (Triticum monococcum) flour on pasta protein polymers

Since not only the presence or absence of specific proteins but also the quantities of gluten proteins and the ratios of gliadins to glutenins or of gluten proteins types determine the dough properties and baking performance of common wheat flour [14], extractable and unextractable protein profiles from semolina and einkornflour obtained by fractionation through SE-HPLC (Figure 2) were analyzed. Semolina profile was as described by Lamacchia and others [27,28,29], with a polymeric protein peak (peak 1) of high molecular weight glutenin at the extreme left of the profile (large polymeric proteins, LPP), followed by a small peak (peak 2) of glutenin with a lower molecular weight (small polymeric proteins, SPP), a large peak (peak 3) of monomeric gliadins proteins (large monomeric proteins, LMP) and finally small peaks (peaks 4 and 5) of albumins and globulins, known as small monomeric proteins (SMP).

food-processing-technology-extractable

Figure 2: SE-HPLC profiles of extractable (A; B) (obtained without sonication) and unextractable proteins (C; D) (obtained by sonicating the residue after removal of the extractable protein fraction in SDS-phospate buffer) of durum wheat semolina and einkorn flour. Panel A and B show peaks 1 and 2 corresponding to large (LPP) and small (SPP) polymeric proteins, respectively; peaks 3 and 4 and 5 corresponding to large (LMP) monomeric proteins and small (SMP) monomeric proteins, respectively

The SE-HPLC elution profile of einkorn flour was quite similar to that of durum wheat semolina both for the quality and number of peaks. The marked similarity of the two flour elution profiles can be explained considering the fact that einkorn is a cereal belonging to the Triticum species and although it is a diploid (AA), contains all classes of proteins (albumins, globulins, gliadins and glutenins) present in the tetraploid (AABB, durum) and hexaploid (AABBDD, soft) wheats. Although, it is noteworthy that einkorn differently to semolina has less LMP (peak 3; gliadins ) and consequently a lower ratio value of gliadins (LMP, peak 3) to glutenins (High Molecular Weight, LPP, peak 1+ Low Molecular Weight, SPP, peak 2).

SE-HPLC profiles for total proteins in pasta made with durum wheat semolina and increasing amount (30, 50, 100%) of einkorn flour, contain three similar main peaks to high, medium and low molecular weight that differ in peak size (data not shown). Table 2 summarises this information in percentage terms of total proteins. Glutenins (LPP and SPP) and non gluten proteins (SMP) peak area increased significantly (p<0.001) as einkorn flour percentage increased (Table 2) in the composite pasta, while the gliadin (LMP)peak area tend to decrease. This in accordance with the fact that the einkorn wheat flour is particularly rich in high and low molecular weight albumins and globulins with respect to durum wheat semolina (Figure 1A), present in the LPP + SPP and SMP peaks, respectively and poor in gliadins (Table 2).

  Durum wheat semolina Einkorn
flour
100%-semolina pasta 30%-einkorn pasta 50%-einkorn pasta 100%-einkorn pasta
LPP+SPP 28.7% A
(5469.2µV.s)
33.6% B
(6047.95µV.s)
31.1% C
(6939.35µV.s)
33.5% B
(7641.7µV.s)
35% D
(5762.45µV.s)
36% D
(6746.6µV.s)

LMP
48.55% A
(8898.25µV.s)
38.03% B
(6553.45 µV.s)
49.35% A
(10603.9µV.s)
46.39% C
(9990.3 µV.s)
42.5% D
(7632.55µV.s)
40.74% D
(7119.85µV.s)
SMP 22.75% A
(4214.75µV.s)
28.37% B
(4993.05µV.s)
19.55% C
(4260.05µV.s)
20.11% C
(4449.8 µV.s)
22.5% A
(4294.95µV.s)
23.26% D
(4166.5 µV.s)
Total area 100%
(18582.2 µV.s)
A
100%
(17594.45µV.s)
A
100%
(21803.3µV.s)
B
100%
(22081.8 µV.s)
B
100%
(14641.2 µV.s)
C
100%
(18032.9 µV.s)
A

A,B,C,D=ρ<0.001

Table 2: Percentage values of peak areas computed from SE-HPLC profiles of extractable proteins.

It is worth to note a significant decreases of the total area of the composite pasta with 50% of einkorn flour with respect to other types of pasta, in accordance with what was seen in Fig. 1B suggesting the formation of larger insolubleprotein aggregates. The formation of polymeric aggregates in this formulation of pasta is confirmed by the percentage of UPP. The unextractability of 50% einkorn pasta was significantly (p<0.001) higher with respect to those of pasta made with 100% (23.99%) and 30% (19.48%) einkorn flour, respectively and significantly higher (p<0.001) with respect to that of 100% semolina pasta, up to a value of about 53.41%. An explanation for these results could come considering the formation of different polymeric structures based on the percentage of the flours used.

In particular, polymeric structures formed in the 30% einkorn pasta could have been particularly affected by the high content in albumins, globulins and ω-gliadins of einkorn flour, and by an excess among the Low Molecular Weight subunits of C-type ones which tend to prevent the elongation of the polymer due to the availability of only a cysteine residue to form interchain disulphide bonds. Therefore a decrease of UPP in 30% einkorn pasta could be due by both an interaction, due to drying temperature, of the chain terminators C- type LMW and HMW-GS, forming polymers of small size and to the self-assembling of ω-gliadins which are not available to form interchain disulphide bonds due to the absence of cysteine residues. Moreover, high molecular weight albumins and globulins, only present in einkorn flour (Figure 1A), coagulate very easily at low temperature forming specific ultrastructure such as fibril like pattern as found by Shomer and others [30]. Thus, the aggregates formed in this type of pasta, because of their chemical nature, consisting mainly of C-type LMW, ω-gliadins, albumins and globulins, and structure, composed of gluten polymers of small size and fibril like–patterns of non-gluten proteins [30] and ω-gliadins, remain for the majority extractable in SDS-phosphate buffer without sonication. This would be supported by the fact that the amount of S-S bonds (Table 3), in this type of pasta, is the lowest one together with that of 100% einkorn pasta and did not reflect the percentage of semolina added, in fact an S-S- bond value closer to that of 100% durum wheat pasta would have been expected.

  Durum wheat semolina Einkornflour 100%-semolina pasta 30%-einkorn pasta 50%-einkorn pasta 100%-einkorn pasta
%UPP 35.35A 39.78B 39.56B 19.48C 53.41D 23.99E
S-S μmol/g di prot 80.06Aa 73.38Bb 77.38Aa 68.94Bc 90.90D 68.18Bc
S-H μmol/g di prot 90.68Aa 74.63Bb 87.80Aa 88.89Aa 68.25C 78.32Bb
Total Cysteine μmol/g di prot 250.81Aa 221.39Bb 242.56Aa 226.77Bb 250.05Aa 241.68Dd

A,B,C,D,E=ρ<0.001
a,b,c,d=ρ<0.05

Table 3: Effect of the replacement of semolina with increasing amount of einkorn flour on percentage of total UPP and concentration of SH and S-S groups expressed as μm/g of pasta proteins.

Polymeric structures of 50% einkorn pasta, instead, could have been influenced more by the increase of HMW-GS with a higher molecular weight (1A × 1) than by albumins, globulins, ω-gliadins and C- type LMW einkorn content. In fact, it is possible that the 1Ax1 HMW-GS amount present in 50% einkorn pasta represents the minimum amount (quantitative effect [31,32]), enough to give rise, together with the 1B × 7 HMW-GS present in semolina, to a growing large polymer, with the two HMW-GS forming the backbone by end-to-end or headto- tail linkages whose branches are represented by B-type LMWGS present in durum wheat semolina. Also in this case the result is supported by the amount of S-S bonds of this type of pasta (Table 3). 50% einkorn pasta shows the highest S-S value among the different type of pasta but also with respect to the control pasta made of 100% semolina. The protein polymers in the 50% einkorn pasta, which result by interactions of HMW and LMW proteins, are very large polymers mainly unextractable in SDS-phoshate buffer without sonication that generally lead to an increase of UPP [32]. Furthermore, sometimes a part of these polymers, due to the size, become also unextractable in SDS-phoshate buffer applying sonication [29,27,28]. The formation of such polymeric structures in the 50% einkorn pasta would explain the significant decrease of both electrophoretic bands and total peak area in this type of pasta with respect to the other ones.

Effect of the replacement of semolina with einkorn (Triticum monococcum) flour on pasta sensory properties

The results of the panel test, performed at the optimum cooking time are reported in Table 4. A decrease in stickiness and an increase in firmness were detected in 50% einkorn pasta. Stickiness is affected by the amount of unabsorbed water associated with drained cooked pasta and is related to the amount of amylose leached from the gelatinized starch granules. Firmness, on the other hand, is primarily affected by protein level [33]. Therefore, a possible explanation for these results is that the replacements of semolina with 50% einkorn flour induce deep changes in the structure of pasta protein polymers. In particular, this pasta formulation may cause the formation of larger and insoluble polymers (as evidenced from the gel electrophoresis and SE-HPLC). The formation of very large and insoluble proteins aggregates may allow starch to absorb water in minor amount preventing starch leaching and therefore stickiness. In addition, the larger aggregates of polymeric proteins, formed during 50% einkorn pasta-making, may contribute to a stronger gluten network which results in a firmer pasta after cooking, thus improving pasta overall quality (Table 4).

  100%-semolina pasta 30%-einkornpasta 50%-einkornpasta 100%-einkornpasta
Stickiness 76 36 81 27
Firmness 64 40 78 33
Overall judgment 70 68 88 40

Table 4: Results of the panel test on a 0 (very bud)-100 (very good) scale.

Conclusion

In the current investigation, pasta produced with different mixture of semolina and einkorn flour exposed difference in the amount of UPP and in cooking quality. In particular, pasta replaced with 50% einkorn flour showed an increase of the unextractable polymeric proteins with respect to the other type of pasta and also to the control pasta, prepared using 100% durum wheat semolina. According to the panel test, stickiness decreased in 50% einkorn pasta. This type of pasta was less sticky and more firm than the other type of pasta and of the control one. The formation of large and insoluble aggregates at the end affects pasta cooking quality. The replacement of 50% einkorn flour induce deep changes in the structure of the protein polymers that increase in size and strength allowing starch to absorb less water, preventing pasta stickiness and increasing firmness and affecting in a positive way cooking behavior and acceptability. The present study highlighted that the reactions responsible for the better sensory properties of composite pasta with respect to semolina pasta took place at drying temperatures lower than those usually applied in industrial plants. All these results needs to be transferred from pilot to large scale but could represent an interesting starting point for producers aiming to launch on the market new pasta products combining health benefits and consumer liking.

Acknowledgement

This work was carried out with the financial support of the Italian Ministry of Research (MIUR) under the programme “Protocolli tecnologici e clinici innovativi per la produzione di alimenti funzionali (ProAliFun)” project “P.O.N 02_00186_2937475 Ricerca e Competitività 2007-2013”.

References

  1. Hidalgo A, Brandolini A (2008) Protein, ash, lutein and tocols in einkorn (Triticummonococcum L. subsup.monococcum) seed fractions. Food Chemistry 107: 444-448.
  2. Erba D, Hidalgo A,Bresciani J, Brandolini A (2011) Environmental and genotypic influences on trace element and mineral concentrations in whole meal flour of einkorn (TriticummonococcumL.subsp. monococcum). Journal of Cereal Science 54: 250-254.
  3. Streblow W, Hertuka G, Wenffen W (1994) Aspettinutrizionali. Le caratteristichedietetichedelfarroneltrattamento di malattiecroniche. AttidelConvegno "Il farro un cerealedella salute".
  4. Corbellini M, Empilli S, Vaccino P, Brandolini A, Borghi B, et al.(1999) Einkorn characterization for bread and cookie production in relation to protein subunit composition. Cereal Chemistry 76: 727-733.
  5. Pizzuti D, Buda A, D'Odorico A, D'IncĂ  R, Chiarelli S, et al. (2006) Lack of intestinal mucosal toxicity of Triticummonococcum in celiac disease patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 41: 1305-1311.
  6. Vincentini O, Maialetti F, Gazza L, Silano M, Dessì M, et al. (2007) The environmental factors of celiac disease: Cytotoxicity of hulled species Triticummonococcum, Triticumturgidumsspdicoccum and T. aestivumsspspelta. Journal of Gastroenterology Hepatology 22: 1861-1822.
  7. Vaccino P, Becker HA, Brandolini A, Salamini F, Kilian B, et al. (2009) A catalogue of Triticummonococcum genes encoding toxic and immunogenic peptides for celiac disease patients. Mol Genet Genomics 281: 289-300.
  8. Suligoj T, Gregorini A, Colomba M, Ellis HJ, Ciclitira PJ, et al. (2013) Evaluation of the safety of ancient strains of wheat in coeliac disease reveals heterogeneous small intestinal T cell responses suggestive of coeliac toxicity". Clinical Nutrition.
  9. Brandolini A, Marturini M, Plizzari L, Hidalgo JC, Pompei C, et al. (2008) Chimical and technological properties of Triticummonococcum, Triticumturgidum and Triticumaestivum. TecnicaMolitoria International 59: 85-93.
  10. Borghi B, Castagna R, Corbellini M, Heun M, Salamini F, et al. (1996) Breadmaking quality of einkorn wheat (Triticummonococcum ssp. monococcum). Cereal Chemistry 73: 208-214.
  11. Lamacchia C, La Gatta B, Schiavulli A, Pati S, Petrella G, et al. (2013) Triticummonococcum species, a chance for pasta business. Professional Pasta 5: 12-27.
  12. Liu C, Shepherd KW, Rathjen AJ (1996) Improvement of durum wheat pasta making and breadmaking qualities. Cereal Chemistry 73: 156-166.
  13. Wieser H, Muller KJ, Koehler P (2009) Studies on the protein composition and baking quality of einkorn lines. European Food Research and Technology 229: 523-532.
  14. Wieser H (2000) Comparative investigations of gluten proteins from different wheat species. I. Qualitative and quantitative composition of gluten protein types. European Food Research and Technology 211: 262-268.
  15. Osborne TB (1907) The proteins of the wheat kernel. Carnegie Institute,Washington, DC.
  16. Gupta RB, Khan K, MacRitchie F (1993) Biochemical basis of flour properties in bread wheats I. Effects of variation in the quantity and size distribution of polymeric protein. Journal of Cereal Science 18: 23-41.
  17. Kuktaite R, Larsson H, Johansson (2003) Variation in protein composition of wheat flour and its relationship to dough mixing behavior. Journal of Cereal Science 40: 31-39.
  18. Chan KY, Wasserman BP (1993) Directcolorimetric assay of free thiol groups and disulphide bonds in suspensions of solubilized and particulate cereal proteins. Cereal Chemistry 70: 22-26.
  19. Payne PI, Corfield KG (1979) Subunit composition of wheat glutenin proteins, isolated by gel filtration in a dissociating medium. Planta 145: 83-88.
  20. Jackson EA, Holt LM, Payne PI (1983) Characterization of high molecular weight gliadin and low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits of wheat endosperm by two dimensional-gel electrophoresis and the chromosomal localization of their controlling genes. Theoretical Applied Genetics 66: 20-37.
  21. Waines JG, Payne PI (1987) Electrophoretic analysis of the high-molecular- weight glutenin subunits of Triticummonococcum,T. urartu and the A genome of bread wheat (T. aestivum). Theoretical Appied Genetics 74: 71-76.
  22. Branlard G, Dardevet M (1985) Diversity of grain protein and bread wheat quality. II. Correlation between high molecular weight subunits of glutenin and flour quality characteristics. Journal of Cereal Science 3: 345-354.
  23. Payne PI, Holt LM, Jackson EA, Law CN (1984) Wheat storage proteins: Their genetics and their potential for manipulation by plant breeding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 304: 359-371.
  24. Linsday MP, Skerritt JH (1999) Thegluteninmacropolymer of wheat flour doughs: structure-function perspectives. Trends in Food Science and Technology 10: 247-253.
  25. Kasarda DD (1999) Glutenin Polymers: The in Vitro to in Vivo Transition. Cereal Food World 44: 566-571.
  26. Lamacchia C, Baiano A, Lamparelli S, Padalino L, La Notte E, et al.(2010) Study on the interactions between soy and semolina proteins during pasta making. Food Research International 43: 1049-1056.
  27. Lamacchia C, Baiano A, Lamparelli S, Terracone C, Trani A, et al.(2011) Polymeric protein formation during pasta-making with barley and semolina mixture, and prediction of its effect on cooking behavior and acceptability. Food Chemistry 129: 319-328.
  28. Lamacchia C, Di Luccia A, Baiano A, Gambacorta G, la Gatta B, et al. (2007) Changes in pasta proteins induced by drying cycles and their relationship to cooking behaviour. Journal of Cereal Science 46: 58-63.
  29. Shomer I, Lookhart G, Salomon R, Vasiliver R, Beans S, et al. (1995) Heat coagulation of wheat flour albumins and globulins, their structure and temperature fractionation. Journal of Cereal Science 22: 237-249.
  30. Halford NG, Field JM, Blair H, Urwin P, Moore K, et al. (1992) Analysis of HMW glutenin subunits encoded by chromosome 1A of bread wheat (Triticumaestivum L.) indicates quantitative effects on grain quality. TheorAppl Genet 83: 373-378.
  31. MacRitchie F (1999) Wheat proteins: characterization and role in flour functionality. Cereal Foods World 44: 188-193.
  32. Malcolnson LJ, Matsuo RR, Balshaw R (1993) Textural optimization of spaghetti using response surface methodology: effects of drying temperature and durum protein level. Cereal Chemistry 70: 417-423.
Citation: Agnello PD, , Landriscina L, Schiavulli A, Lamacchia C (2016) Polymeric Proteins Formation During Pasta-making with Einkorn (Triticum monococcum) and Semolina Mixtures and Effects on Cooking Behaviour and Acceptability. J Food Process Technol 7: 548.

Copyright: © 2016 Agnello PD, , et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.