Journal of Neonatal Biology

Impact of Neonatal Outreach on Referral Patterns

Jayant Shenai^* Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, USA
^*Correspondence: Jayant Shenai, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, USA, Email:

Received: 29-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. JNB-22-17791; Editor assigned: 04-Jul-2022, Pre QC No. JNB-22-17791(PQ); Reviewed: 21-Jul-2022, QC No. JNB-22-17791; Revised: 26-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. JNB-22-17791(R); Published: 04-Aug-2022, DOI: 10.35248/2167-0897.22.11.357

Description

A regionalized system of prenatal health care delivery includes neonatal transport as a key component. Early identification of newborns at high risk, consultation, communication, and referral are encouraged through an efficient outreach educational campaign. The information provided in various formats also encourages the best stabilization of referred neonates prior to and during transportation. The overall newborn prognosis may be positively impacted by this enhanced stability. A thorough examination of referral patterns, the level of care provided during stabilization, and neonatal outcomes can be used to gauge the effect of education in the area. Therefore, an organized educational outreach program is a crucial component of any neonatal transport program.

Neonatal mortality, which typically occurs within a few days of birth and against the backdrop of socioeconomic disadvantage in underdeveloped countries, bears an excessive load on infant and under-five mortality. Recent reviews have assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of individual interventions during the antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal periods in reducing neonatal mortality and packages of interventions have been proposed for widespread implementation to guide programs aimed at preventing these 4 million annual deaths [1]. However, there hasn't yet been a thorough analysis of empirical data on intervention packages, taking into account communitybased intervention packages. The author examined the content, impact, efficacy (implementation under ideal conditions), effectiveness (implementation within health systems), type of provider, and cost of packages of interventions reporting newborn health outcomes in peer-reviewed journals and grey literature to fill this gap [2]. Studies reporting neonatal morbidity or mortality outcomes and using more than one biologically conceivable neonatal health intervention (i.e., package) were considered. Studies were arranged according to research design, mortality strata, and the delivery manner and timing of their individual component interventions [3].

There was no real effectiveness trials carried out at scale in health systems. No research focused on women before conception, the majority of antenatal interventions were vitamin supplementation trials, and the scope of intrapartum interventions was primarily clean delivery. The majority of interventions seemed to be combined for convenience or financial reasons rather than because of predicted synergistic effects, such as the style of service delivery or cost-effectiveness [4]. Only two research provided information on costeffectiveness. To effectively execute public health programs addressing newborn health, the research basis supporting the effects of neonatal health intervention packages is insufficient. It is necessary to make a sizable investment in large-scale effectiveness trials that are meticulously customized to local health requirements and carried out in developing nations. Objectives analyze the referral satisfaction, motivations and hurdles, preferences for service delivery, outreach communication, and education of a local NICU. Research plan the use of an internet survey with multiple-choice or Likert scale questions to highlight the prevalence of regional neonatologists' assessments of preferences, referral causes, satisfaction, and general feedback. The outreach program team came to accord on the survey's questions. Results 136 neonatologists provided a 100% response rate. More than 90% of respondents said they were "maybe" or "certainly" satisfied with the outreach effort and reported referral rates that had either grown or remained stable [5]. Important referral reasons included insurance, bed availability, excellent subspecialty support, and communication with neonatologists. The repute of the research was not a big factor. The chosen teaching strategies were case conferences at referral hospitals and program newsletters. Conclusions For referrals to our quaternary NICU, advanced subspecialty services, communication with the referring neonatologists, and availability of the referral system are critical factors in patient satisfaction.

Currently, there is insufficient empirical support for the effectiveness of neonatal health care packages to develop strong programs. There is a strong need for an evidence-based approach to packaging interventions, but this needs significant funding for high-quality research and program learning. Intervention plans should use a variety of service delivery techniques along the continuum of care, from preconception to postpartum, and should make it easier for communities and accessible healthcare facilities to connect with one another. Few studies made the investments required to improve demand creation for care, to increase the likelihood that parents would appropriately recognize complications or accept referrals, to help with transportation to a facility, or to improve the capacity of health facilities to provide quality care and handle increased demography, even though 14 of the 41 studies in this included at least one intervention component to encourage these linkages and many encouraged referrals.

REFERENCES

1. Adam T, Lim SS, Mehta S, Bhutta ZA, Fogstad H, Mathai M, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of strategies for maternal and neonatal health in developing countries. Bmj. 2005; 331(7525):1107.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Arif MA, Arif K. Low birthweight babies in the Third World: maternal nursing versus professional nursing care. J Trop Pediatr. 1999; 45(5):278-280.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

3. Atukorala TM, De Silva LD, Dechering WH, Dassenaeike TS, Perera RS. Evaluation of effectiveness of iron-folate supplementation and anthelminthic therapy against anemia in pregnancy-study in the plantation sector of Sri Lanka. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994; 60(2):286-292.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

4. Nandi B, Mungongo C, Lakhoo K. A comparison of neonatal surgical admissions between two linked surgical departments in Africa and Europe. Pediatric surgery international. 2008; 24(8):939-942.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Krishnaswami S, Nwomeh BC, Ameh EA. The pediatric surgery workforce in low-and middle-income countries: problems and priorities. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016; 25(1): 32-42. WB Saunders.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]