Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Academic Journals Database
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Scimago
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Journal Flyer
Flyer image
Sterile body fluid culture using blood culture bottles is superior to direct fluid culture for identification of pathogens
12th World Congress on Biotechnology and Microbiology
June 28-29, 2018 | Amsterdam, Netherlands

Kenneth L Muldrew

Baylor College of Medicine, USA
The University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Microb Biochem Technol

Abstract:

Background: The traditional procedure for body fluid cultures includes fluid inoculation on routine media. In addition, some centers inoculate blood culture bottles. This study assessed the accuracy and agreement, and total recovery of clinically significant bacterial organisms from body fluids compared to the traditional methods. Materials & Methods: Three years of retrospective data was reviewed for body fluid specimens in which a blood culture bottle was submitted in addition to the standard fluid for routine culture. Blood bottles were incubated on the BACTEC 9000 instrument (Becton Dickinson) for five days or until growth was detected. For cultures using routine media, blood, chocolate and MacConkey agars and thioglycollate broth were inoculated, incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 and examined daily for three days. Results: Results were compared between the two methods for the presence of pathogens and likely contaminants. Specimens (n=468) were examined and results were compared and categorized as follows: (1) Concordance: 440 (90.5%); (2) No correlation (different organisms identified by each method): 6 (1.2%); (3) Pathogens detected by one method only: bottles: 30 (6.2%) vs. routine: 10 (2.1%); p for difference=0.0018; OR=3.42 (95% CI=1.52- 6.52); (4) Contamination rate: Blood bottles: 1% (5/440) vs. Routine culture: 0.4% (2/440); p for difference=0.2780; OR=2.62 (95% CI=0.51-13.59). Conclusion: Both methods showed a high correlation, but blood culture bottles allowed for isolation of more significant pathogens than routine culture while not showing an increase in the detection of likely contaminants. The increased sensitivity can likely be attributed to the larger volume of specimen inoculated into the bottle and a more optimal nutritive environment. Our data suggest, utilization of blood culture bottles in sterile body fluid cultures should be the preferred method of detecting pathogens.