Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Academic Journals Database
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Scimago
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • MIAR
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Journal Flyer
Flyer image
Prograf 5 mg vs. Tacrolimus medis in healthy volunteers: A bioequivalence
7th World Congress on Bioavailability & Bioequivalence: BA/BE Studies Summit
August 29-31, 2016 Atlanta, USA

Marwan A Masri, Sylvana Rizk, L Boujbel, W Bellahirich, D Baassoumi, M Attia and V Matha

Transmedical for Life, Lebanon
Transmedical for Life, Canada

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Bioequiv Availab

Abstract:

For FDA approval, bioequivalence of a generic version of Tacrolimus must be demonstrated in a randomized two-treatments, two-periods, two-sequences, single-dose crossover study in healthy adult volunteers. Currently there are at least 3 differents generic equivalent for Tacrolimus that are approved by the EMA and the FDA with a USA market share of nearly 50%. However the market share of generic immunosuppressive drugs in the Middle East region is still very low due to the reluctance of the physician to accept Tacrolimus generics, considered to be a narrow therapeutic window drug that are approved using the standard bioequivalence criteria of 80-125%. We here present a bioequivalence study of a new Tacrolimus generic, Tacrolimus medis 5 mg developed by Medis Tunisia batch number 12G3003 compared to Prograf® 5 mg batch number 7202 manufactured by Astellas Toyama Co., Ltd., Japan and HIKMA Pharmaceuticals, Amman-Jordan in healthy adult volunteers using the 90-111% criteria recommended for drugs with narrow therapeutic window. The study was, balanced, randomized, two-treatments, two-periods, two-sequences, single dose, crossover, comparative oral bioavailability study in healthy adult human volunteers. The study was carried out in accordance with the basic principles defined in the U.S. 21 CFR Part 312.20, the principles enunciated in the declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki). Thirty six (36) non-smoking healthy as determined by medical history, volunteers, between the ages of 18 years and above were included. Following randomization using a computer software (pharma solution). The volunteers were given a single oral dose of 5 milligrams following a 12 hour fast with a wash out period of 7 days. Pharmacokinetics profile with blood levels at: 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours were performed following each dose. Tacrolimus plasma level was determined using an HPLC validated method (Transmedical For Life S.A.R.L. Beirut Lebanon) for accuracy, suitability, reproducibility, precision, long term stability and robustness. Physical examinations, hematology, urine analysis and serum chemistry tests were performed at screening and before dosing in each period and at end of the study. Volunteers were monitored for safety and adverse events throughout the study. Both products were bioequivalent at the entire pharmacokinetic parameters tested (Graph). The LSM were 95.31-101.21% for AUC, 94.65-101.11% for AUC0-inf, 97.15-100.02% for Cmax and 91.54-103.75% for half-life. Respectively all of which are within the EU and FDA approval limits (90-111%) indicating that the 2 products are equivalent and switchable.

Biography :

Email: marwanmasri@tmforlife.com marwanmasri@hotmail.com