Research Article - (2016) Volume 7, Issue 6

Preparation, Optimization and Characterization of Eudragit Coated Chitosan Piroxicam Microspheres Intended for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Kalla Madhavi1*, S Shobha Rani2, Shaheda Khatoon1 and Choppari Vijender3
1Department of Pharmacy, Care College of Pharmacy, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telangana, India
2JNTU, Kukatpally, Hyderabad, India
3Kakatiya University, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Telangana, India
*Corresponding Author: Kalla Madhavi, Department of Pharmacy, Care College of Pharmacy, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telangana, India, Tel: 91-9963073027 Email:

Abstract

As a novel drug delivery approach, piroxicam an anti rheumatoid drug is loaded in microspheres prepared by chitosan as a polymer and coated with eudragit S-100 to prepare colon specific microspheres which increases the bioavailability of the drug to the targeted area and in a controlled manner and reduces GI related side effects. In the present study chitosan microspheres were prepared using emulsion crosslinking technique, glutaraldehyde as a crosslinker and microencapsulation using phase coacervation technique. Optimization is done by varying drugpolymer ratio (1:2 to 1:8), emulsifier concentration, i.e., span 80 (0.5 ml, 0.75 ml, 1 ml), stirring speed (500 rpm, 1000 rpm, 1500 rpm, 2000 rpm, 2500 rpm), cross-linker concentration (2.5 ml, 5 ml, 10 ml) and coat-core ratio from 1:2 to 1:6. The prepared chitosan microspheres showed high entrapment efficiency about 97.29% with percent yield 90.26. In the present study FTIR studies confirmed the absence of interactions between the pure drug, i.e., piroxicam and the excipients used. SEM images revealed that the prepared chitosan microspheres were spherical in shape with rough surface and particle size ranged from 90.21 to 172 μm. Showed good drug release profile for both coated and uncoated chitosan piroxicam microspheres of about 86% and 96%. Drug release kinetics showed that microspheres followed korsemeyer peppas model indicating the drug diffusion mechanism from polymer matrix.

Introduction

In the view to deliver drug efficiently to specific organs a novel way, i.e., polymeric microspheres have been designed, and to overcome some of conventional therapy problems such as poor stability, low solubility, increase frequency of administration due to shorter half life, increase side effects, decrease patient compliance, etc. Thus novel drug delivery system is needed and thus designed to improve the healing efficiency of given pure drug, to deliver at the right time, increasing compliance and minimizing side effects. One such delivery system is microspheres as drug carriers [1].

Rheumatoid arthritis is most chronic autoimmune disease causing inflammation of joints, main symptom including morning stiffness. Piroxicam an NSAID frequently used for symptom relief but are associated with GI side effects where safety becomes primary requisite this can be achieved by polymeric microspheres and to achieve chronopharmacotherapy in order to increase patient compliance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis [2]. The present work was to prepare colon specific polymeric microspheres because of the long residence time in colon, i.e., 72 h [3].

Materials and Methods

Piroxicam was obtained from TRIDENT Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad (India), eudragit S100 was purchased from HiMedia laboratories, Chitosan of 55KD and all other materials used were of pharmaceutical grade.

Method of preparation

Chitosan microspheres were prepared by using emulsion method and glutaraldehyde was used as a cross-linker. A (2% w/v) chitosan solution was prepared with about 20 ml of 2% v/v aqueous acetic acid solution in which required amount of piroxicam was added gradually upon stirring. This drug polymer solution was stirred on a magnetic stirrer which was kept overnight. Aqueous phase (internal phase) was dispersed into 100 ml of liquid paraffin and glutaraldehyde, formed microspheres were dried at 50°C in hot air oven [4,5].

Microencapsulation of prepared cross-linked chitosan microspheres by phase coacervation technique

Cross-linked chitosan microspheres were dispersed in 10 ml of coating solution which contained 200 mg of eudragit S100 dissolved in ethanol containing 0.25% v/v span 80, mixture was agitated for about 5 min at 500 rpm. 50 ml of n-hexane was added at a rate of 1 ml/min kept on stirring. The formed coated microspheres washed with n-hexane for 2-3 times and dried at room temperature [6].

Optimization of the formulation by varying process variables

Effect of drug polymer ratio: Microspheres were prepared using different drug polymer ratio, i.e., 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5, 1:6, 1:7 and 1:8 where stirring speed (2000 rpm) and emulsifier concentration (0.5% w/v) were kept constant [7].

Effect of emulsifier concentration: Microspheres were prepared using various concentrations of an emulsifier, i.e., 0.50, 0.75, 1.0 ml maintaining the stirring speed constant (2000 rpm).

Effect of core-coat ratio: Prepared microsphere were coated using various core-coat ratios (1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5, 1:6) where drug polymer ratio (1:5) was kept constant [6].

Pre formulation studies

Solubility study: Solubility study of drug was performed in different solvents, i.e., 0.1 N HCl, 4.5 pH acetate buffer, 6.8 pH phosphate buffer, 7 pH phosphate buffer, glacial acetic acid, methanol and water by shake flask method.

Drug excipient compatibility study: The analytical technique used for drug excipient compatibility study was FTIR with attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) technique. A small portion of a sample was placed on the zinc selenide crystal and spectrum was taken. The IR spectra of the formulation was compared with the IR spectra of pure drug and observed for any spectral changes [8].

Evaluation

Percent yield: Weight of the prepared microspheres was weighed and % yield was calculated using the following equation:.

Percent yield=Practical yield × 100/Theoretical yield.

Practical yield=Amount of the microspheres collected after the experimental method

Theoretical yield=Total amount of the drug and the excipients used in the preparation

Particle size analysis: Particle size analysis of the prepared microspheres was performed using compound microscope by calibrating eye piece micrometer.

Entrapment efficiency: 25 mg of drug loaded chitosan microspheres were taken in 25 ml of methanol and kept under continuous stirring for about 24 h and then the sample was centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm and the supernatant layer was separated and analyzed using UVvisible spectrophotometer at ƛmax 240 nm. Entrapment efficiency was calculated using the formula [8].

% Entrapment efficiency=Practical drug loading × 100/Theoretical drug loading

Micromeritic properties: Flow property of prepared microspheres was determined using fixed base cone method. Bulk density using bulk density apparatus, tapped density by a 10 ml graduated cylinder and using bulk density and tapped density data; compressibity index and hausner’s ratio were calculated.

SEM studies: SEM studies of chitosan microspheres were carried out by gentle sprinkling on an adhesive tape which was fixed on the dies followed by vaccum and high voltage for taking images under high and low resolution.

Stability studies: Stability studies were conducted for the optimized formulation for about 3 months in stability chamber as per ICH guidelines prescribed for tropical countries.

4.5.7 In vitro drug release study: 100 mg of prepared piroxicam microspheres were taken in a dialysis bag, dipped into 900 ml of dissolution medium at 37 ± 0.5°C in a paddle type dissolution apparatus at 50 rpm. Study was carried out in 0.1 N HCl buffer (pH 1.2) for first 2 h, then in pH 4.5 phosphate buffer for next 2 h and then followed by pH7 phosphate buffer up to 24 h. An aliquot of 5 ml was withdrawn at predetermined time intervals and the samples were analyzed using UV-visible spectrophotometer.

Drug release kinetics: To describe drug release kinetics, release data was fitted in different kinetic models.

Results and Discussion

In an attempt to reduce side effects of piroxicam for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, eudragit S100 coated chitosan microspheres were prepared and evaluated. The evaluation results are discussed below.

Effect of drug to polymer ratio

As the polymer ratio increased, increase in mean diameter was observed because of increase in viscosity and needed more energy for the particle break down to smaller size particles. The drug entrapment efficiency also increased as the concentration of polymer increased because of high chances of polymer surrounding the drug and thus preventing escape of drug into external solvent and the increase was only up to 1:5 (drug-polymer ratio) and then decreased. As the polymer amount increase even % yield also increased (Table 1).

Drug polymer ratio Mean particle size (µm) Percent yield % entrapment efficiency
1:2 90.2 81.2 74
1:3 94.3 84.9 81.2
1:4 98.0 86.4 85.4
1:5 109.0 90.2 97.2
1:6 138.4 91.3 94.2
1:7 145.0 92.3 92.4
1:8 172 96.6 90

Table 1: Effect of drug to polymer ratio on the particle size, % yield, entrapment efficiency.

Effect of emulsifier concentration

Without surfactant, i.e., span80, microspheres formed were found to be aggregated. When 0.5% of span80 was added it showed formation of stable emulsion and on increasing the concentration of span80, percent yield increased, might be due to increase in number of droplets in emulsion formed (Table 2).

Drug polymer ratio Emulsifier concentration (ml) Mean particle size (µm) % yield % Entrapment efficiency
1:5 0.5 107 88.2 96.2
1:5 0.75 102 89.9 95.3
1:5 1 100.2 90.2 94.2

Table 2: Effect of emulsifier concentration on particle size, %yield and entrapment efficiency.

Increase in span80 concentration decreased the total drug content in the chitosan microsphere, that may be due to solubilizing effect of span80 on piroxicam during preparation of microspheres and 0.5 ml was the optimized concentration of the emulsifier, as it showed high % entrapment efficiency.

Effect of stirring speed

Among the various stirring speed, stirring at 2000 rpm shows a uniform formation of microspheres. Higher than 2000 rpm resulted in rupture of dispersion droplets thus resulted in fewer microsphere formation (Table 3).

Drug polymer ratio Stirring speed Mean particle size (µm)
1:5 500 389.2
1:5 1000 349.1
1:5 1500 205.3
1:5 2000 110.3
1:5 2500 87.5

Table 3: Effect of stirring speed on particle size.

Increase in glutaraldehyde concentration showed on significant effect in the formation of microspheres. As the core coat ratio increased a slight increase in particle size was observed (Table 4).

Drug:Polymer Ratio Glutaraldehyde volume (25%v/v) in ml Mean Particle size (µm)
1:5 2.5 86
1:5 5 84
1:5 10 82.3

Table 4: Effect of crosslinking agent on particle size.

Flow properties of prepared microspheres were measured and showed to be greater than 25°C indicating excellent flow property. Even % compressibility index (%) and hausner’s ratio values indicated excellent flow property for the prepared microspheres. Bulk density and tapped density found to be less than 1.26 g/cc indicating good packing and excellent flow characteristics (Figures 1 and 2).

pharmaceutica-analytica-acta-FTIR-spectrum

Figure 1: HPLC chromatogram of the nine reference compounds in 50% aqueous methanol, measured at 370nm. Retention times for rutin, sutherlandin A, sutherlandin B, kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside, sutherlandin C, sutherlandin D, quercitrin, quercetin and kaempferol were 11.9, 12.7, 13.8, 15.3, 16.2, 17.0, 18.0, 26.2 and 28.1 minutes, respectively.

pharmaceutica-analytica-acta-FTIR-spectrum-drug

Figure 2: FTIR spectrum of drug and all the excipients used.

From the FTIR studies of pure drug and prepared microspheres it was observed that, the intensity and position of the absorption bands had no significant change and thus from the spectrum it is clear that there is no interaction between drug and excipients used in the formulation (Table 5).

IR absorption bands of Piroxicam IR absorption bands of prepared chitosan formulation (1:5)
-NH 3333.8 -NH 3357.3
Sec Amine 1572.3 Sec Amine 1587.5
-OH 3326.8 -OH 3269
-C=C 1625.7 -C=C 1631.5

Table 5: IR absorption bands of piroxicam and that of prepared chitosan microspheres (1:5).

SEM images revealed that the prepared microspheres were discrete and spherical shaped with rough outer surface (Figure 3).

pharmaceutica-analytica-acta-SEM-image-optimized-formulation

Figure 3: SEM image of optimized formulation

Release profile from uncoated microspheres was slow but independent of pH of the dissolution fluid. Decrease in drug release rate might be due to cross linking of microspheres. And also that increase in the concentration of crosslinking agent decreases the amount of drug release this might be due to presence of more crosslinking agent available to react with the NH2 groups of chitosan. In uncoated chitosan microspheres complete drug release (almost 86%) within 10 h indicates the need for enteric coating of the formulation for colon delivery (Figures 4-6).

pharmaceutica-analytica-acta-drug-release-pattern

Figure 4: In vitro drug release pattern of uncoated formulations.

pharmaceutica-analytica-acta-coated-formulations

Figure 5: In vitro release pattern of coated formulations.

pharmaceutica-analytica-acta-comparative-release-profile

Figure 6: In vitro comparative release profile of uncoated and coated formulation of CM4

Enteric coated microspheres showed no drug release in simulated gastric fluid for up to 2 h whereas in simulated intestinal fluid media showed negligible drug release. In pH 7 phosphate buffer drug release was about 96% in 24 h. Analyzing the overall drug release profile of the coated microspheres, it is evident that microspheres retained their integrity upto 24 h releasing the drug slowly and consistently.

On filling the release data in kinetic models and comparing the regression values, it is clear that it follows korsemeyer peppas, indicating that the drug release from polymer matrix is by diffusion and showed high slope (n) value which indicates that the release from the prepared microspheres was anomalous (non-fiction) release mechanism.

Stability studies were conducted at 40°C/75% RH for 3 months in stability chamber. Samples for 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months were collected and assayed to determine drug degradation during this three month period of stability testing (Table 6).

Time Assay Value (%)
1 Month 99.31
2 Month 99.14
3 Month 98.92

Table 6: Assay values of the optimized formulation during stability studies.

Conclusion

An attempt was made to prepare and encapsulate cross-linked chitosan microspheres using emulsion method.

The prepared microspheres showed good retardation and sustained release for 24 h.

Increase in polymer concentration, increased drug entrapment efficiency up to a point then decreased. The other variables like emulsifier concentration, stirring speed and cross-linking concentration also affected entrapment efficiency and drug release.

Formulation 1:5 where polymer is about 400 mg was selected as optimized formulation, it showed 98% drug release in 24 h following korsemeyer peppas model with non fickian diffusion mechanism.

Based on the observations it can be concluded that the prepared piroxicam microspheres can show chronopharmacotherapy and with minimal side effects.

Acknowledgement

The author thanks the director of Care College of pharmacy, Warangal, for providing necessary facilities to carry out this work.

References

Citation: Madhavi K, Rani SS, Khatoon S, Vijender C (2016) Preparation, Optimization and Characterization of Eudragit Coated Chitosan Piroxicam Microspheres Intended for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Pharm Anal Acta 7:485.

Copyright: © 2016 Madhavi K, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.