Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • The Global Impact Factor (GIF)
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Recommended Webinars & Conferences
Journal Flyer
Flyer image

Research Article - (2011) Volume 2, Issue 5

Gas Chromatographic Determination of Prochloraz in Ten Herbal Medicines

Jialun Wu1*, Jing Zhao1, Tianyu Wang1, Aoran Chen1 and Jian Xue2
1Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop, Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China
2Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100193, China
*Corresponding Author: Dr. Jialun Wu, Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China, Tel: 0086 0571 86971221, Fax: 0086 0571 86971221 Email:


A method for determining prochloraz in ten herbal medicines is described. Pesticide standards were fortified into herbal medicines at 3 levels (0.005, 0.01 and 0.05mg/kg). Prochloraz reacts with pyridine hydrochloride and generates a hydrolysate, the 2,4,6-trichlorophenol which responded intensively in GC-ECD. The results showed average recoveries were between 76.6% and 105.1%. The method evidenced good accuracy and precision for monitoring prochloraz in ten herbal medicine samples. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.005mg/kg. It is linear from 0.005 mg/L to 2.000mg/L. The regression equation is y=3816.1x-7.7835, R=0.9997.

Keywords: Prochloraz, Fungicide, Gas chromatography, 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol, Herbal medicine.


Herbal Medicines have been prevailing for thousands of years in China, which are the treasure to all human beings. With the increasing demand for herbal medicines, most of them are cultivated in fields. Plant disease, pest insects and weeds, which results in yield loss and lower quality, are the primary limitation to the production. Currently, it is a main method to use pesticides in medicinal herb fields for controlling the damage caused by Plant disease, pest insects and weeds. Prochloraz (N-propyl-N-[2-(2,46-trichlorophenoxy)-ethyl] imidazole-1-carboxamide) (Figure 1) is a non-systemic imidazole fungicide, an ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitor with contact and translaminar, protectant and eradicant activity. It is used in agriculture and horticulture against various plant diseases, especially Ascomycetes and Fungi Imperfecti. It is used to control foliar diseases of cereals (Pseudocercosporella, Pyrenophora, Rhynchosporium and Septoria spp.), field crops (such as Alternaria, Botrytis, Pyrenopeziza and Sclerotinia in oilseed rape, Ascochyta and Botrytis in legumes, Pyricularia in rice), fruit (blossom blight) and vegetables (anthracnose) [1]. In china, it is also used in medicinal herb fields.


Figure 1: Structural formula of prochloraz.

Several analytical methods of prochloraz residues have been reported. Most of them were on vegetable, fruit, and cereals [2-15], some is on soil and water [16,17]. It is not found on herbal medicines. Ginseng Rodix ET Rhizoma , Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae, Isatidis Radix, Curcumae Rhizoma, Dioscoreae Rhizoma, Crataegi Fructus, Acanthopanacis Senticosi Radix, Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, Lorydalis Rhizoma and Radix Astragali are conventional Chinese herbal medicines that are artificially planted. Prochloraz is a popularly used fungicide in these medicinal herb fields. The object of this work was to develop a method for determining prochloraz in herbal medicines. It is significant to find, control prochloraz residue and improve the quality of herbal medicines.



a. Gas chromatograph.-Agilent 7890A equipped with an ECD detector (Agilent Technology Company, USA).

b. Vacuum pump.- SHB-III-A(Hangzhou Dawei Scientific Ltd., PRC).

c. Rotary evaporator.-LABOROTA 4010(Heidolph Instruments, Germany).

d. Ultrasonic Machine.-KQ5200DE (KunShan Ultrasonic Instruments Co., Ltd, PRC).

e. Grinder.—DD-01(Wenling Linda Machine Ltd., PRC).

Reagents and materials

. Solvents- All organic solvents, e.g., acetone, dichloromethane, petroleum ether, hydrochloric acid and concentrated sulfuric acid, analytical grade (made in China).

. Sodium sulfate anhydride- Analytical grade and heated 8 h at 450ºC and stored in a tightly capped bottle until used.

• Celite 545— (Fluke).

. Pesticide standards solution-Prochloraz which was provided by Dr. Ehrenstorfer. 500mg/L dissolve in methanol. 2,4,6-trichloro-phenol were provided by DIMEE TECHNOLOGY in Hexane. Pyridine hydrochloride was provided by Hangzhou Faojing Fine Chemical Industry Ltd., Zhejiang, PRC.

. Herbal medicines-buy from market or supplied by Medicinal herb GAP plantation.


Dried samples were pulverized and passed through a 20-mesh screen. Weigh 4g sample in a 250 ml screw-stop sample bottle, add 5 ml 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid and 60 ml acetone, ultrasonic extract for 30 minutes. Vacuum filtrate with Buchner funnel (add a filter paper and suitable celite545). Elute the sample bottle with 40ml acetone. Collect filtrate into a 250 ml flask and concentrate to 3~5ml in a rotary vacuum evaporate at 45ºC. The remaining solution was transferred to a 250 ml separating funnel, add 40 ml 10% sodium chloride water solution. Extract with 2×50ml dichloromethane. Collect organic phase which passed through 10g sodium sulfate anhydrous into a 250ml Florence flask and concentrate to 5~10 ml in a rotary vacuum evaporate at 48ºC. Transfer concentrated solution into a 50ml round-bottom flask, rinse the Florence flask with 20ml dichloromethane, combine extracts carefully and concentrate to almost 1 ml in a rotary vacuum evaporate at 48ºC then evaporate to completely dry with soft nitrogen stream.

Hydrolysis and cleanup

Add 2g pyridine hydrochloride into the flask, connected with a condenser pipe. Heated up to 220~240ºC in a thermostatic oil bath for 1 hour. Wash the condenser pipe with 10 ml distilled water after cooling. Put the stopper on the flask and shake to dissolve completely. Transfer the solution into a 250 ml separating funnel and elute the flask several times with 30 ml 0.01 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution, collect all solution to the separating funnel. Decontaminate with 2 x 20mL petroleum-ether/toluene (4:1, v/v), and the organic phase was discarded. Adding 3 ml 1 mol/L hydrochloric acid, extract with 2 x 30mL petroleum ether, collect organic phase which passed through 10 g sodium sulfate anhydrous into another 250 ml separating funnel. Add 10 ml concentrated sulfuric acid into 250 ml separating funnel, shake for 1 minute. Discard concentrated sulfuric acid layer. Repeat 2 times until concentrated sulfuric acid layer is clear. Wash organic phase with 2×40 mL 10% sodium chloride water solution discard water solution. Collect organic phase into the 250 ml flask and concentrate to almost 1 ml in a rotary vacuum evaporate at 48ºC then evaporate to completely dry with soft nitrogen stream. Add 2 ml n-hexane and mixed for determination.

Condition of gas chromatograph

The analysis of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol was carried out by GC using an Agilent 7890A with an ECD, a capillary chromatographic column SE-54, 30m×0.32mm×0.25µm film thickness. The temperature program applied as follows: 100ºC for 1 min, 100-160ºC at 15ºC /min, 160ºC for 3 min, 160-180ºC at 2ºC /min, 180ºC for 5 min, 180-250ºC at 30ºC /min and 250ºC for 5 min. The injector port temperature was 250ºC, detector temperature, 300ºC; Nitrogen carrier gas flow rate, 1 ml/min. up gas, 30ml/min and septum purge flow to appropriate levels, 3ml/min. The injection port type: splitless, inject amount was 1 µl.

Standard sample

Respectively add 0.005, 0.010, 0.050, 0.500, 1.000, 2.000mg/L standard sample into a round-bottle flask and evaporate to completely dry with nitrogen. Next processing step according to 2.4 and 2.5 described.

Results and Discussion

The method used demonstrated acceptable performance for the prochloraz residue analysis in ten herbal medicines. Under the chromatographic conditions described, good linear and correlation coefficient was achieved for the compound studied. Replicates (n=3) of six standard pesticide solutions of different concentrations were found to be linear in the range from 0.005 to 2.0 mg/L for the chromatographic techniques (Figure 2). The regression equation for the calibration curve was y=3816.1x-7.7835. The correlation coefficients obtained for the prochloraz was 0.9997. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for prochloraz under study was 0.005 mg/kg. Validation of the method for this fungicide was performed by fortified recovery study with prochloraz at 0.005, 0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg levels. For analyses by this method, average recovery ranges of prochloraz from ten herbal medicines were 76.6-105.1%. Relative standard deviations (RSD) were 0.9-7.9%. The detail results are shown in Table 1. Some typical chromatograms of 2,4,6-trichloro-phenol standard, fortified 0.5 mg/ kg prochloraz with no herbal medicines and solvent check unfortified prochloraz are shown in Figures 3-5. Typical chromatograms of herbal medicine samples untreated and fortified 0.5 mg/kg of prochloraz are shown in Figures 6 and 7.


Figure 2: Calibration curve for prochloraz (concentration from 0-2.0 mg/L).


Figure 3: Chromatogram of 0.5mg/kg 2,4,6-trichloro-phenol.


Figure 4: Chromatogram of fortified 0.5mg/kg of prochloraz standard (no sample).


Figure 5: Chromatogram of solvent check of unfortified prochloraz.


Figure 6: Chromatogram of Rhizoma Curcumae unfortified prochloraz.


Figure 7: Chromatogram of Rhizoma Curcumae fortified with 0.5mg/kg of prochloraz.

Sample name Fortified concen.(mg/kg) Recovery(%) Average recovery(%) RSD(n=3)/%
Ginseng Rodix ET Rhizoma 0.005 102.5 97.1 103.8 101.1 3.5
0.010 106.3 96.2 98.7 100.4 5.2
0.050 103.8 100.2 108.2 104.1 3.9
Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae 0.005 91.2 93.4 95.1 93.2 2.1
0.010 96.2 92.2 93.0 93.8 2.3
0.050 102.4 98.8 97.9 99.7 2.4
Isatidis Radix 0.005 86.7 85.7 89.1 87.2 2.0
0.010 107.1 93.4 94.1 98.2 7.9
0.050 108.4 106.7 100.3 105.1 4.1
Curcumae Rhizoma 0.005 79.4 85.4 83.6 82.8 3.7
0.010 93.9 94.2 91.1 93.1 1.8
0.050 96.7 95.1 97.8 96.5 1.4
Dioscoreae Rhizoma 0.005 76.8 74.8 78.2 76.6 2.2
0.010 79.8 79.2 80.7 79.9 0.9
0.050 86.1 83.7 90.8 86.9 4.2
Crataegi Fructus 0.005 88.8 86.0 84.3 86.4 2.6
0.010 91.9 89.2 93.4 91.5 2.3
0.050 90.8 96.4 95.8 94.3 3.3
Acanthopanacis Senticosi Radix 0.005 81.2 83.1 85.5 83.3 2.6
0.010 97.6 96.6 92.2 95.5 3.0
0.050 106.4 105.2 100.7 104.1 2.9
Lonicerae Japonicae Flos 0.005 86.2 88.0 84.7 86.3 1.9
0.010 92.5 99.5 93.1 95.0 4.1
0.050 88.4 96.4 95.5 93.4 4.7
Lorydalis Rhizoma 0.005 83.6 85.1 85.7 84.8 1.3
0.010 102.8 98.4 98.1 99.8 2.6
0.050 95.2 93.3 95.6 94.7 1.3
Radix Astragali 0.005 79.8 93.3 86.0 86.4 7.8
0.010 91.8 88.5 90.4 90.2 1.8
0.050 85.7 96.2 95.3 92.4 6.3

Table 1: Recoveries of prochloraz in ten medicinal herb samples.

In hydrolysis, the rate that prochloraz hydrolyzes to 2,4,6-trichlorophenol would influence reliability and veracity of the method. On the basis of stechiometry, the prochloraz is hydrolysed with pyridine hydrochloride to break down all components to 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. This hydrolysate is then cleaned-up by extraction into the aqueous layer with alkali and re-extraction into petroleum ether after acidification. Total 2,4,6-trichlorophenol residues are determined by gas chromatography with electron capture detector, and the results are expressed as prochloraz equivalents by correcting the measured 2,4,6-trichlorophenol concentration for the molecular weight factor of 1.9. The tested result of prochloraz standard showed the conversion rate was above 98% under the test condition.

FAO and WHO reported MRLs of prochloraz in cereal grains and rape seed were 0.05 mg/kg (France), in mushroom were 0.05 mg/kg (The Netherlands), in other products were 0.01 mg/kg (The Netherlands) [18]. By now, no any MRL of prochloraz was established in herbal medicines. In view of many countries usually set 0.01 mg/ kg as a criteria for no MRL products, such as "Positive list system of Japan", the method is available for herbal medicines. Paoli et al (1997) reported a GC-ECD method for determining 2,3,4-trichlorophenol as prochloraz in vegetable, fruit and wheat, and the LOQ were 0.01-0.5 mg/kg. Blasco et al (2001) developed a LC-MS and LC-UV method for determining prochloraz in fruits and vegetables. The LOQ was 0.1 mg/kg (LC-MS) and 0.5 mg/kg (LC-UV). Polese et al (2006) described results of prochloraz, which determined as 2,3,4-trichlorophenol, and its metabolite residue in ginger. The LOQ of GC-ECD method was 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg, respectively. The method of this paper is more sensitive compared with published papers in terms of the LOQ. The method described here has been successfully used to determine prochloraz in ten Chinese herbal medicines. The GC-ECD method should be readily applicable to other Chinese herbal medicines.


We express our gratitude to Jilin Hongjiu Biotechnology Ltd., Jilin Good Agricultural Practice plantation of Ginseng and Mr. Jiewei Zou for providing Chinese herbal medicine samples.


  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2009) FAO SPECIFICATIONS AND EVALUATIONS FOR PROCHLORAZ, 12
  2. Paoli MDe, Barbina MT, Damiano V, Fabbro D, Bruno R (1997) Simplified Determination of Combined Residues of Prochloraz and its Metabolites in Vegetable, Fruit and Wheat Samples by Gas Chromatography, Journal of Chromatography A, 765: 127-131
  3. Polese L, Jardim EFG, Navickiene S, Brito NM, Ribeiro ML (2006) Prochloraz Residue Levels in Ginger Submitted to Sporatak 450 CE Postharvest Treatment, Ecletica Quimca, 31: 59-63
  4. Blasco C, Pico Y, Manes J, Font G (2002) Determination of fungicide residues in fruits and vegetables by liquid chromatography-atomspheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry, J. Chromatography A, 947: 227-235.
  5. Kastanias MA, Chrysayi-Tokousbalides M, Coward S, Philippoussis A, Diamantopoulou P (2006) Residue evaluation of the azole fungicides prochloraz and tebuconazole in the white mushroom agaricus bisporus, Bull. Environ Contam Toxicol 77: 149-154
  6. Lafuente MT, Tadeo JL (1985) Residues analysis of posrharvest imidazole fungicides in citrus fruit by HPLC and GLC. Environmental Anal Chem 22: 99- 108.
  7. Rodriguez R, Boyer I, Font G, Pico Y (2001) Capillary zone electrophoresis for the determination of thiobendazole, prochloraz and procymidone in grapes. Analyst 126: 2134-2138.
  8. Dreassi E, Zanfini A, Zizzari T A, Rosa CL, Botta M, Corbini G (2010) Lc/Esi/MS/MS determination of postharvest fungicide residues in citrus juices, Food Science and Technology, 43: 1301-1306.
  9. Yin G, Han H, Yuan H (2007) Gas chromatography determination of prochloraz in mangoes, Chinese Journal of South China University of Tropical Agriculture 13: 15-17.
  10. Li T, Wang Y, Liu B, Gao X (2010) Residual detection and degradation dynamics of prochloraz in Ya pear. Chinese Journal of South China Agricultural University 31: 36-39.
  11. Yu C, He B, Yan J. (2004) Analysis of prochloraz residue in orange, Chinese Journal of Modern Agrochemicals, 3: 28-29
  12. Liu X, Chen P., Shen J., Cheng Y, Chen H. (2007) Analysis of prochloraz residue in mushroom with liquid chromatography/Mass spectrometry, Chinese Journal of Analytical Science, 23: 523-526.
  13. Liu X, Chen P, Cheng Y, Li S, Chen H, Wu M. (2006) Study on residue detection and degradation in rapeseed and soil, Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Science, 28: 354-57.
  14. Han L, Qian C, Jiang C, Wang W. (2005) Residue detection and degradation of prochloraz and its metabolites in rice, Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 7: 54-58
  15. Cheng L, Dong F., Liu X, Zhang Y, Chen W, et al. (2009) Simplified method for determination of fungicide prochloraz residues in wheat using QuEChERS and UPLC-MS/MS. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science 11: 357-361.
  16. Aktar MW, Sengupta D, Purkait S, Ganguly M, Paramasivam M (2008) Degradation dynamics and dissipation kinetics of an imidazole fungicide (Prochloraz) in aqueous medium of varying pH, Interdiscip Toxicol 1: 203- 205.
  17. Andreas Höllrigl-Rosta, Robert Kreuzig, Müfit Bahadir (1999) Investigations on the metabolic fate of prochloraz in soil underfield and laboratory condition. Pesticide Science 55: 531-538.
  18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation (1985) FAO and WHO pesticide residues in Food-1983, Roma.
Citation: Wu J, Zhao J, Wang T, Chen A, Xue J (2011) Gas Chromatographic Determination of Prochloraz in Ten Herbal Medicines. Pharm Anal Acta 2:128.

Copyright: © 2011 Wu J, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.