Journal of Aquaculture Research & Development

Exploring Trends in Aquatic Cultivation Studies

Lucia Ferraro^* Department of Marine Biology, University of Naples, Naples, Italy
^*Correspondence: Lucia Ferraro, Department of Marine Biology, University of Naples, Naples, Italy, Email:

Received: 29-Jul-2025, Manuscript No. JARD-25-30153; Editor assigned: 31-Jul-2025, Pre QC No. JARD-25-30153 (PQ); Reviewed: 14-Aug-2025, QC No. JARD-25-30153; Revised: 21-Aug-2025, Manuscript No. JARD-25-30153 (R); Published: 28-Nov-2025, DOI: 10.35248/2155-9546.25.16.1017

Description

In recent years, the scope and sophistication of aquaculture development have demonstrated a clear evolution in the focus and depth of aquaculture research. Rather than limiting investigations to basic observations of growth patterns in cultured species, researchers are now adopting more comprehensive approaches that consider a variety of environmental and biological factors. This broader scope has brought attention to areas such as salinity fluctuations, feed composition improvements and the intricate dynamics of microbial communities within aquaculture systems. These additions reflect a growing understanding that aquatic farming success depends on a combination of interacting variables, not isolated conditions. A review of recent volumes shows that consistent themes are emerging, particularly surrounding fish nutrition, water quality control and resistance to diseases. A notable trend involves experimentation with new feed sources. Traditional feed formulations are being revaluated and frequently compared with innovative alternatives like insectbased protein and microalgae. These comparisons aim not only to determine growth efficiency but also to assess potential benefits in health, environmental impact and economic feasibility. The push toward sustainable and locally available feed sources is evident, driven by the need to reduce dependency on fishmeal and fish oil, which are often costly and environmentally unsustainable [1-3].

Researchers are also paying closer attention to how cultured species respond to environmental stressors. Trials have tested the impact of variables such as temperature changes and variations in dissolved oxygen levels, recognizing that fluctuations in these conditions are common in both natural and controlled aquatic environments. The physiological responses of fish under these stresses such as shifts in behaviour or feeding are increasingly studied alongside biological indicators. For example, measurements of blood parameters, oxidative stress enzymes and immune responses are used to evaluate the health status of fish under different feeding regimens or water conditions. These biomarker analyses help determine how well aquatic organisms can adapt or thrive under varying culture practices. Scientific literature also reflects interest in different types of aquatic environments, with experiments conducted in freshwater, brackish and marine systems. These comparative studies shed light on how different species or even the same species behave under distinct salinity levels, allowing researchers to tailor management strategies accordingly. Furthermore, aquaculture system design is another area of growing interest. Some papers compare monoculture setups where only one species is grown to polyculture systems that include multiple species sharing the same space. The latter often demonstrate advantages in terms of nutrient recycling, better use of available resources and even improved growth balance among species due to the complementary roles they play in the ecosystem [4-6].

Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) systems are another focal point in recent research. These systems combine different types of aquatic organisms, such as fish, aquatic plants and shellfish, to form a synergistic cycle in which waste from one group serves as input for another. For instance, fish waste may fertilize aquatic plants or feed filter-feeding shellfish. Such systems offer promise in reducing environmental waste, optimizing resource use and enhancing sustainability. Though not universally adopted, they represent a growing interest in circular practices within aquaculture. Despite the diversity in species and regional conditions featured in the research, the overarching goals remain consistent: Improving survival rates, increasing productivity and ensuring long-term environmental and economic sustainability. Open access system is instrumental in promoting global scientific exchange , as it allows widespread access to research findings. Scientists, students and practitioners from various parts of the world can engage with the work, replicate promising experiments and apply relevant techniques in their own unique environments. One of the ongoing challenges, however, lies in the context-specific nature of many studies. Because certain experiments are conducted in specific climates, water bodies, or using locally sourced species and materials, the findings are not always universally applicable. Variability in water chemistry, temperature regimes and ecological conditions can limit the generalizability of results across regions. Nonetheless, even studies with limited scope provide valuable starting points for further inquiry. They offer foundational data that can be tested under different circumstances, or adapted through localized experimentation [7-10].

Conclusion

Looking ahead, it is likely that the field will see more collaborative, cross-regional efforts aimed at synthesizing data from different studies. Meta-analyses that draw together findings from various climates, species and systems could offer stronger, more widely applicable conclusions. Similarly, predictive modelling is expected to play a larger role, especially in the context of climate change. Models that simulate how fish or systems respond to projected environmental shifts will be critical tools for future planning. These efforts are already underway, with the existing body of research laying the groundwork for such innovations. Altogether, the studies published in the aquaculture field across diverse ecosystems illustrate a vibrant, evolving field that is steadily moving toward more holistic, data-driven and sustainable practices. While specific experiments may be limited in scope, their cumulative impact is significant, offering a growing resource of knowledge for aquaculture professionals and researchers worldwide. The progression of this research signals a commitment not just to improving immediate outcomes, but also to securing the future of aquaculture in an increasingly complex and variable world.

References

1. Schreiber C, Zacharias N, Essert SM, Wasser F, Müller H, Sib E, et al. Clinically relevant antibiotic-resistant bacteria in aquatic environments–an optimized culture-based approach. Sci Total Environ. 2021;750:142265.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

2. Rezania S, Kamyab H, Rupani PF, Park J, Nawrot N, Wojciechowska E, et al. Recent advances on the removal of phosphorus in aquatic plant-based systems. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;24:101933.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

3. Moradiya KK, Marathe KV. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of marine microalgae cultivation and harvesting process for the Indian context. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2023;56:103063.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

4. Anzum HM, Shaibur MR, Nahar N, Akber A, Hossain MS, Al Mamun S. Changing dynamics of river ecosystem from aquatic to terrestrial: A case of Bhairab River, Jashore, Bangladesh. Watershed Ecol Environ. 2023;5:134-142.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

5. Duan J, Cui R, Huang Y, Ai X, Hao Y, Shi H, et al. Identification and characterization of four microalgae strains with potential application in the treatment of tail-water for shrimp cultivation. Algal Res. 2022;66:102790.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

6. Srisunont C, Srisunont T, Babel S. Development of models for sustainable green mussel cultivation under climate change events. Ecol Model. 2022;473:110141.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

7. Chu Y, Wang J, Xie J. Foodomics in aquatic products quality assessment during storage: An advanced and reliable approach. Food Biosci. 2024 Apr;58:103734.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar]

8. Rain-Franco A, Le Moigne A, Serra Moncadas L, Silva MO, Andrei AS, Pernthaler J. Dispersal shapes compositional and functional diversity in aquatic microbial communities. mSystems. 2024;9(12):e01403-24.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

9. Jia C, Zhang X, Sun H, Gu P, Yuan Y, Gao W, et al. Zebrafish selection strategy for the first zebrafish cultivation experiment on the Chinese space station. Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 2025;46:43-52.

   [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]

10. Goswami P, Kanda K, Tamamura-Andoh Y, Watanabe M, Guruge KS. Microplastics: Hidden drivers of antimicrobial resistance in aquatic systems. NanoImpact. 2025:100566.

    [Crossref][Google Scholar][PubMed]