Research Article - (2013) Volume 4, Issue 6
Keywords: Zaleplon; Stability indicating; Densitometric; Spectrofluorimetric; Acidic degradations
Zaleplon is a sedative hypnotic of the pyrazolopyrimidine class with a chemical name of N-[3-(3-cyanopyrazolo {1, 5-a} pyrimidine-7- yl) phenyl]-N-ethylacetamide (Figure 1). It has an empirical formula of C17H15N5O and a molecular weight of 305.34 g/mol [1]. It is chemically unrelated to the benzodiazepine class of medications for sleep, but it has similar effects. It is extensively metabolized into 5-oxo zaleplon and 5-oxo desethyl zaleplon. Zaleplon interacts with GABA receptor complex and shares some of the pharmacological properties of the benzodiazepines [2]. Moreover, zaleplon has the ability to shorten sleep latency, promote the maintenance of sleep, and increase slow wave sleep in the early phases as seen in polysomnographic studies in humans [3].
The literature survey reveals several methods for determination of Zaleplon in plasma [4-9], hair and oral fluids [10,11], blood [12-14], human urine [15] and in postmortem specimen [1,16]. It was also determined in capsules by voltammetric method [17] and in tablets by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method [18]. It is worth noting that only one spectrofluorimetric technique was reported for its determination in micellar medium, which established as a non stability indicating method [19]. It was determined in presence of its impurities and degradation products by HPLC method only [2]. A spectrophotometric, densitometric and HPLC methods were adopted for its determination in pharmaceutical preparations as stability indicating methods only with its alkaline degradations [20].
The scientific novelty of the present work is that all the previously mentioned methods didn’t prove to determine zaleplon in presence of its acidic degradations. So, in the present work, two simple, selective, and validated methods of densitometry and spectrofluorimetry were developed to quantify the drug in its pure form, in a pharmaceutical formulation, and in mixtures with its acidic degradation products.
Apparatus
1. Shimadzu densitometer– dual wave length flying spot (CS– 9301, Tokyo, Japan).
2. Thin layer chromatographic plates precoated with silica gel GF254, (10×20) cm (Fluka, Switzerland ).
3. 100 μl Hamilton microsyringe (Germany).
4. UV lamp with short wave length 254 nm. (Desaga-Germany).
5. Shimadzu Spectrofluorometer (RF-1501, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with xenon lamp and 1-cm glass cells.
Materials
Authentic sample: Zaleplon (B.N.20103201p) was kindly supplied by Al –Andalous medical Company. Its purity was found to be 99.3% as referred by the supplier.
Dosage form: Siesta® capsules (Batch No. 50507), labeled to contain 10 mg Zaleplon is from SIGMA For Al Andalous Medical Company, Cairo, Egypt.
Chemicals and solvents
• Ethanol, cetrimid and ethyl acetate (Sigma Aldrich. St. Louis. USA), methanol and ammonia 33% (El Nasr Pharmaceutical Chemicals Co. Egypt), hydrochloric acid (Aldrich, Germany), sodium hydroxide (Winlab, France); 6N solutions prepared in water, sulphuric acid (Adwic Co, Egypt), cetylpyridinium bromide (Prolabo, Egypt), tween 40, tween 80 (Aldrich, Egypt), triton TX-100 (aMRGSCO, Co., Egypt), sodium lauryl sulphate (BHD, Egypt) and β-cyclodextrin (Deltapharma).
• Deionised water (SEDICO pharmaceuticals Co., Cairo, Egypt).
N.B.: All the chemicals were of analytical grade. The solvents used for the spectrodensitometric method were of spectrophotometric grade.
Stock solutions
Stock standard solution for spectrodensitometric and spectrofluorimetric methods: Stock solution of zaleplon was prepared by weighing accurately 100 mg of pure powder, transferring into two separate 100-ml volumetric flasks, adding 20 ml ethanol, shaking well then completing to the mark with the same solvent to get 1000 µg/ml stock solution for each.
Stock standard solution of acidic degradates: Stock standard solution of acidic degradates: 100 mg zaleplon powder were accurately weighed and transferred into 250 ml round flask, dissolved in 20 ml ethanol then refluxed with 100 ml 6N hydrochloric acid for 12 hours. After cooling, the solution was adjusted to pH 7-8 with 6N sodium hydroxide and evaporated to dryness under vacuum. The residues were then extracted with ethanol (3×20 ml), filtered into 100-ml volumetric flask and completed to volume with ethanol to get 1000 ugm/ml stock solution. Fifty milliliters of this solution was evaporated to a few mls and applying in band form to TLC glass plates. The plates were developed using ethyl acetate: methanol: amm. 33% (8.5:1:0.5 v/v/v) as a developing system. The bands were scrapped and extracted three times with 5-ml ethanol. The extracts were filtered and allowed to dry at room temperature until constant weight.
Working solutions
For spectrodensitometric method: Serial dilutions of each of zaleplon and its degradate were separately transferred into two separate series of 10 ml volumetric flasks, completed to the mark with ethanol to get 50-250 µg/ ml working solutions
For spectrofluorimetric method: One milliliter of each of zaleplon and its degradates were separately transferred into two separate 100 ml volumetric flasks, completed to the mark with ethanol to get 10 µg/ml working solutions.
Spectrodensitometric method
Linearity and construction of calibration curve: Accurate aliquots of (10µl) equivalent to (0.5-2.5 µg/spot) of zaleplon working solutions were applied on precoated 10×20 cm TLC aluminum sheet silica gel F254 plates using Hamilton micro-syringe (100 µl). Plates were spotted 1.5 cm apart from each other and 2 cm apart from the bottom edge. The chromatographic chamber was pre-saturated for 30 minutes with the mobile phase, then developed by ascending chromatography with ethyl acetate : methanol : ammonia 33% (8.5:1:0.5 v/v/v) as a mobile phase through a distance of 7 cm at room temperature. The plates were air dried and detected under UV lamp (254 nm),Zaleplon spots were scanned at 338 nm. The calibration curve was constructed by plotting the area under the peak versus the corresponding drug concentrations in µg/spot and the regression equation was developed.
Analysis of laboratory prepared mixtures:The peak area of different laboratory prepared mixtures containing different ratios of zaleplon and the degradates were measured and the concentration of zaleplon in each mixture was obtained by applying in the corresponding regression equation.
Spectrofluorimetric method
Linearity and construction of calibration curve: Aliquots of working ethanolic solution were transferred into a series of 25-ml volumetric flasks to get final concentration of (0.1-3.6 µg/ml), followed by adding 8 ml 3% SLS and diluted to the volume with water. The fluorescence intensity was measured at λem 460 nm using λex 350 nm. Calibration curve was constructed by plotting the fluorescence intensity versus the corresponding drug concentrations in µg/ml and the regression equation was computed.
Analysis of laboratory prepared mixtures: The fluorescence intensity of different laboratory prepared mixtures containing different ratios of zaleplon and the degradates were measured and the concentration of zaleplon in each mixture was obtained by applying in the corresponding regression equation.
Application to pharmaceutical formulation
The content of 5 capsules of Siesta® capsules each contains 10 mg zaleplon were emptied and mixed well, transferred into 50-ml volumetric flask, 25 ml ethanol were added, then centrifuged for about 30 min, filtered, then completed to the volume to get 1000 µg/ ml stock solution. Then as mentioned in details under each method, appropriate working solutions were prepared, linearity procedure was followed and the drug concentrations were calculated from the corresponding regression equations. The validity of the method was assessed through applying the standard addition technique by mixing different concentrations of the standard drug to a fixed amount of its formulation. The concentrations of standard added were calculated from the corresponding regression equations.
As zaleplon is susceptible to acidic degradation being contains the nitril group which is liable to hydrolysis in presence of thermal conditions, so far the techniques in this manuscript are adopted to be stability indicating methods.
Interpretation of infrared spectra
IR spectrum of zaleplon is characterized by principal absorption peaks at 3,088 cm-1 (C-H aromatic), 2,928 cm-1 (C-H aliphatic), 2,232 cm-1 (C-N), 1,651 cm-1 (C=O), 1,614 cm-1 (C=N), 1,223 cm-1 (C-N), 1,576 cm-1 (C=C aromatic) [21].
Upon degradation of zaleplon with 6M HCl for 12 hrs, the interpretation of the IR spectrum of zaleplon and its acidic degradates (Figure 2a and 2b) revealed that the peak of cyanide group which appeared in the drug at 2230 cm-1 disappeared and a new one at 3428 cm-1 appeared indicating the presence of hydroxyl group in addition to the appearance of strong absorption band at 1735 that corresponding to carbonyl of carboxylic group. Also the peak of carbonyl group that presents in the parent compound at 1649 cm-1 was disappeared indicating that the amide group was broken and instead of, a broad band that corresponding to amide NH group at 3400-3150 cm-1 was appeared. The proposed mechanism of degradation reaction is illustrated in (Figure 3).
Spectrodensitometric method
This technique is based on the differences in Rf values of zaleplon (0.79), and its degradate (0.52), offering a simple way for quantification of zaleplon directly by measuring the optical density of the separated spots (Figure 4). By applying the method, a linear correlation was obtained between the area under the peak and the concentration in the range of 0.5-2.5 µg /spot, from which the linear regression equation was calculated (Figure 5).
Optimization of spectrodensitometric method: The experimental conditions for the TLC method were optimized to provide accurate, precise, and reproducible results for the determination of zaleplon in the presence of its degradates [22]. The scan mode chosen was the zigzag mode and swing width was 10 mm. Different scanning wavelengths were tried but the best sensitivity was at 338 nm. Also by studying different developing systems with different ratios, the most suitable one with good Rf values was ethyl acetate-methanol-ammonia (33%) (8.5:1:0.5v/v/v).
Spectrofluorimetric method
Zaleplon showed native fluorescence at λem=460 after being excited at λex=350 nm. This fluorescence intensity was increased extensively upon using SLS (anionic surfactant) (Figure 6). The method proved to be stability indicating method as the degradation products do not exhibited native fluorescence [21]. By applying the method, a linear correlation was obtained between the fluorescence intensity and the c oncentration in the range of 0.1-3.6 µg/ml, from which the linear regression equation was calculated (Figure 7).
Optimization of spectrofluorimetric method
Effect of different diluting solvents: Zaleplon showed native fluorescence signal in ethanol. Different solvents were tested to obtain the high relative fluorescence intensity [23]. It was found that the higher fluorescence is in order ethanol > methanol > water > aqueous alkali> aqueous acid, hence ethanol was the solvent of choice in this work (Figure 8).
Effect of micellar medium: The influence of micellar medium on the fluorescence intensity of zaleplon is studied by preparing 2 µg/ml solutions each with 1 ml of 1% surfactants in aqueous media. It proved that the anionic surfactant of SLS enhanced the fluorescent intensity of zaleplon much more than other surfactants. The enhancement was due to the following reasons: zaleplon is a nitrogen-ring compound whose alkalinity is stronger when excited than in the ground state. So zaleplon dramatically inclined to form hydrogen bonds with water in the excited state to cause zaleplon molecules exposed to the oxygen, the fluorescence quencher dissolved in water, hence the fluorescence quenching occurred. With the surfactant added, zaleplon was enriched into micellar assemblies and the protective microenvironment offered by the micellar medium can shield the excited singlet state of zaleplon from intermolecular collisional quenching and non radiative decay process occurring. Also the fluorescence quenching caused by dissolved oxygen was prevented [19]. Moreover, as the anionic surfactant SLS has four oxygen atoms; it can easily form hydrogen bonds with zaleplon. These hydrogen bonds not only prevented the formation of hydrogen bonds between zaleplon and water, but also produce electron donating effect, which can strengthen the delocalization effect of electrons in conjugated system and therefore the fluorescence increased [19]. The enhancement ability sequence is shown in Figure 9.
Effect of amount of SLS: Influence of amounts of SLS on fluorescence intensity of zaleplon was studied. The fluorescence intensity was high and relatively stable over the volume 8 ml of 3%SLS (Figure 10).
Effect of ß-cyclodextrin: The influence of β-cyclodextrin on the fluorescence intensity of zaleplon is studied. By adding different increasing volumes, it proved that 8ml of 1%w/v β-cyclodextrin enhanced the fluorescent intensity of zaleplon but not more than that of SLS. Thus SLS was the sensitizer of choice in this work (Figure 11).
Effect of metal: Upon addition of FeCl3 0.5%, AlCl3 1.33%, ZnSO4 1.5% and Cu acetate 10-2 M; no any complex formed and as a result of that no any change in fluorescence.
Effect of 3-methylbenzothiazolin-2-one hydrazone hydrochloride in the presence of cerium (IV) ammonium sulfate in an acidic medium: Upon addition of 1.5 ml 0.2% MBTH and 1.5 ml 1% cerium (IV) ammonium sulfate in presence of 1N sulfuric acid; no oxidative coupling reaction occurred and as a result of that no any quenching effect on the cerium fluorescence.
Effect of gelatin: Hopefully gelatin may enhance the fluorescence intensity of some compounds, but unfortunately, it was found that it had no any sensitizing effect on zaleplon fluorescence.
Quenching effect of zaleplon on Uranyl acetate fluorescence: Uranyl acetate showed fluorescence at 509 nm after excitation at 305 nm. Zaleplon has a so little quenching effect on this fluorescence, thus there is no need to use it.
Method validation
Linearity: The proposed methods showed a linear correlation between peak under the area in densitometric method and drug concentration in the range of 0.5-2.5 µg/spot. With the spectrofluorimetric method, linearity between fluorescence intensity and drug concentration over the range of 0.1-3.6 µg/ml was obtained. The high value of correlation coefficient assured the validity of the method and its coinciding with Beer's law system as showed with other regression parameters in Table 1.
Parameters | TLC-method | Fluorimetric method |
---|---|---|
Linearity range | 0.5-2.5 µg/spot | 0.1-3.6 µg/ml |
Accuracy Mean ± RSD% | 100.79 ± 0. 65%. | 100.39 ± 1.12 |
Precision (n=9) Mean ± RSD% aIntraday |
99.92 ± 0.44 | 100.29 ± 0.44 |
bInterday | 100.65 ± 0.95 | 100.03 ± 1.07 |
Regression parameters aSlope ± SE |
1249 ± 16.91 | 115.2 ± 0.58 |
bIntercept ± SE | 728.8 ± 30.86 | 18.10 ± 1.43 |
cCorrelation coefficient ± SE of estimation | 0.9994 ± 20.07 | 0.9995 ± 1.26 |
LOD | 0.001 | 0.013 |
LOQ | 0.003 | 0.038 |
Table 1: Regression parameters and method validation results obtained by applying the proposed methods for determination of zaleplon.
Accuracy and precision: The proposed methods showed good repeatability when applied to pure zaleplon over three concentration levels (0.5, 1.5, 2.5) for densitometric method and (0.1, 1.6, 3.6) for fluorimetric method to estimate intra-day variation as shown in Table 1.
Reproducibility of the methods was indicated by applying the proposed methods over the previous concentration levels in 3 different days. The relative standard deviations were less than 2.0% indicating good precision Table 1.
Specificity: Laboratory prepared mixtures containing the intact drug and its degradation products in different proportions were analyzed. The data indicated the validity of the methods for determination of zaleplon in presences of different ratios (w/w µg/spot ) of its degradate without any interference. Good recovery and RSD % indicated that the methods are stability indicating Table 2.
Densitometric method (µg/spot) | Spectrofluorimetric method (µg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intact | Degradations | R% | Intact | Degradations | R% |
2.4 | 0.1 | 99.1 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 100.5 |
2.1 | 0.4 | 99.03 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 100.6 |
1.5 | 0.5 | 100.5 | 2 | 1.6 | 100.8 |
1.2 | 1.3 | 99.6 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 100.1 |
0.9 | 1.6 | 100.9 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 100.9 |
0.5 | 2 | 101.4 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 101.7 |
Mean ± SD | 100.29 ± 0.96 | Mean ± SD | 100.77 ± 0.54 |
Table 2: Determination of zaleplon in mixtures with its acidic degradation products by the proposed methods.
Specificity of the methods was further assured by successful application for analysis of the drug in its pharmaceutical formulation (Siesta® capsules). The satisfactory results were statistically compared with those obtained by the reported method from the supplier company. As shown in Table 3, calculated t- and F- values were less than tabulated ones, indicating no significant difference with respect to accuracy and precision.
Parameters | Densitometric method | Fluorimetric method | Reference methoda |
---|---|---|---|
Mean % | 99.07 | 100.04 | 98.9 |
SD | 0.57 | 0.99 | 1.02 |
Variance | 0.33 | 0.98 | 1.04 |
N | 5 | 5 | 5 |
t-test (2.31)b | 0.33 | 1.05 | |
F-test (6.39)b | 3.15 | 1.06 |
aReference method is the company method,
b Figures in parenthesis are the theoretical values of t and F at p=0.05
Table 3: Statistical analysis of the result obtained by the proposed procedures and reported procedure for the determination of zaleplon in its pharmaceutical formulation.
Validity of the proposed methods was more assessed using the standard addition technique by adding known different amounts of pure zaleplon to a known concentration of the capsules. The good recoveries assured the accuracy of the methods Table 4.
Densitometric method (µg/spot) | Fluorimetric method (µg/ml) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Claimed taken | Pure added | R% of added | Claimed taken | Pure added | R% of added |
0.7 | 0.7 | 99.81 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 101.53 |
1 | 101.45 | 0.8 | 99.04 | ||
1.4 | 100.42 | 1.2 | 100.07 | ||
1.8 | 99.13 | 2.4 | 100.04 | ||
Mean ± SD 100.2 ± 0.9 | 100.17 ± 1.02 |
Table 4: Application of standard addition technique for the determination of zaleplon in its pharmaceutical preparation by the proposed methods.
Detection and quantification limits: The LOD and LOQ were calculated using the following equation [24,25] LOD=3.3 (SD/Slope) and LOQ=10 (SD/Slope) where SD is the standard deviation of response (Table 1).
Stability: Working solutions of zaleplon showed no spectrofluorimetric or chromatographic changes through 4 days when kept stored in refrigerator.
The proposed spectrodensitometric and spectro-fluorimetric methods are accurate, sensitive and selective methods. They allow the determination of zaleplon in pure form, in the presence of its acidic degradation products, as well as in pharmaceutical dosage form. The methods can be applied simply for routine analysis in quality control testing and drug stability monitoring. Moreover, they offer fast response and low cost.