Research Article - (2023) Volume 15, Issue 2

Assessing of HIV Knowledge in Comparison to Urban and Rural in Malaysia: Findings of National Health Morbidity Survey in 2020
Mohamad Hazrin Hasim1*, Mohamad Shaiful Azlan Kassim1, Fazila Haryati Ahmad1, Norhafizah Sahril1, Chan Ying Ying1, Chan Yee Mang1, Nur Liana Majid1, Syamlina Che Abdul Rahim1, Mohd Ruhaizie Riyadzi1, Ahmad Ali Zainuddin1, Mohamad Aznuddin Abd Razak1 and Anita Suleiman2
 
1Department of Pathology, Institute for Public Health, Selangor, Malaysia
2Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health, Putrajaya, Malaysia
 
*Correspondence: Mohamad Hazrin Hasim, Department of Pathology, Institute for Public Health, Selangor, Malaysia, Tel: 033362 8709, Email:

Received: 23-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. BLM-22-19472; Editor assigned: 30-Jan-2023, Pre QC No. BLM-22-19472 (PQ); Reviewed: 14-Feb-2023, QC No. BLM-22-19472; Revised: 21-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. BLM-22-19472 (R); Published: 28-Feb-2023, DOI: 10.35248/0974-8369.23.15.531

Abstract

Introduction: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a retrovirus that targets the CD4+ of human T-lymphocyte cells of the immune system. The weakening immune system causes susceptibility to multiple infective diseases and cancers. This study is aimed to determinant the knowledge regarding HIV/AIDS and to identify the associated factors of the HIV/AIDS knowledge among the urban and rural Malaysian young people.

Methods: Data was collected using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) method. HIV knowledge was assessed using the UNGASS indicators, which contain five questions on HIV prevention and transmission. There were two questions regarding the association between HIV transmission with sexual practice and behaviour. The remainder was one question, each related to insect bite, meal sharing, and knowledge about the physical appearance of someone with HIV infection. Respondents who correctly answer all five questions were considered to have adequate knowledge about HIV/AIDS.

Results: The result from a questionnaire revealed the prevalence of the young people HIV/AIDS knowledge in urban area was 14.7% (95% CI: 9.96, 21.28) whereas in rural area was 10.9% (95% CI: 6.83, 16.89) in 2020. The results revealed significant difference of misconceptions on healthy-looking person have HIV where urban was 71.7% (95% CI: 66.46, 76.37) and rural was 59.8% (95% CI: 56.05, 63.41). Furthermore, there are significant difference of misconceptions on person get HIV by sharing food with someone who is infected whereas urban was 64.8% (95% CI: 60.48, 68.98) while rural was 52.6% (95% CI: 48.67, 56.50).

Conclusion: The findings from this survey have important implications for the development of primary HIV/AIDS prevention programs and HIV educational campaigns to increase knowledge and dispel misconceptions about HIV.

Keywords

HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), AIDS (Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome); Misconception; Prevention; Campaign

Abbreviations

HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; AIDS: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; WHO: World Health Organization

Introduction

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a retrovirus that targets CD4+ T-lymphocyte immune cells. The immune system’s deterioration increases susceptibility to many infectious illnesses and malignancies. Infected individuals develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome as the disease advances over the years (AIDS). Multiple opportunistic infections (such as Pneumocystis jirovecii, Tuberculosis, generalised Candidiasis, and Cerebral Toxoplasmosis) and AIDS-related malignancies (such as Kaposi’s sarcoma) are defining characteristics of AIDS. HIV is spread through bodily fluids such as blood, sperm, and vaginal secretions, as well as vertical transmission from mother to child during pregnancy or birth. It cannot be transmitted through kissing, shaking hands, sharing personal items, or consuming contaminated food or water [1].

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that at the end of 2019, 38 million people worldwide were living with HIV, 1.7 million were newly infected with the disease, and 690,000 died from HIV-related disorders (1). According to the 2019 Malaysian Country Progress Report on HIV/AIDS, the total number of HIV and AIDS cases reported was 118,883 and 25,925, respectively [2]. Health promotion involving HIV/AIDS knowledge has served as a key measure for comparing and assessing national HIV/AIDS preventive programmes [3]. During the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) on HIV/AIDS in June 2001, 189 countries declared their commitment to combating the spread of the pandemic [4].

A person with insufficient HIV/AIDS knowledge and awareness is more susceptible to contracting the disease and may spread the epidemic throughout the population [5]. Numerous global HIV knowledge prevalence studies have been conducted. 67% of Bolivians were observed to have inadequate understanding, compared to less than half (44.7% of South Africans) and 51.9% of unmarried young women in Uganda [6-8]. In 2006, a study of 1,075 young Malaysian adults aged 15 to 24 years revealed intermediate HIV/AIDS awareness, with a mean score of 20,1 out of 32 [9]. Only fifty percent of secondary school students in Malaysia who responded to an online survey utilising the UNGASS indicators correctly identified both methods for preventing the sexual transmission of HIV and rejected main HIV transmission myths [2].

The main objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge in Malaysia. This study is specific to determinant the knowledge regarding HIV/AIDS and to identify the associated factors of the HIV/AIDS knowledge among the urban and rural Malaysian young people.

Materials and Methods

Study design

Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) was used to collect data. Using the UNGASS indicators, which comprise five questions on HIV prevention and transmission, an evaluation of HIV knowledge, was conducted. There were two questions concerning the relationship between HIV transmission and sexual behaviour and practise. The remaining questions dealt with insect bites, food sharing, and understanding of the physical appearance of a person infected with HIV. Respondents who answered all five questions correctly were deemed to have sufficient understanding of HIV/AIDS.

Data analysis

Data were cleaned and error-checked before coding using double data input in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (v.26) programme. Participants were recruited from multiple states; hence the SPSS survey software was utilised to adjust clustering effects. Data were reported as relative frequencies and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for categorical variables, and as means and 95% CI for quantitative variables. Using chi-square tests, the participants of various age groups’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours were compared. All P-values were two-sided, and a value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge among espondents aged 13 years and above

Overall, the prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge was 22.6% (95% CI: 19.67-25.85) among general population aged 13 years and above. Respondents living in urban areas had a significantly higher likelihood of adequate HIV knowledge (24.9% (95% CI: 21.40-28.78)) than their rural counterparts (14.8% (95% CI: 11.82- 18.42)). Meanwhile, the prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge was similar among males (22.7% (95% CI: 19.46-26.34)) and females (22.5% (95% CI: 18.9-26.54)). The age group of 40-44 years had the highest prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge (40.3% (95% CI: 32.19-49.05)), while the lowest prevalence was found among younger age group of 13-14 years (12.2% (95% CI: 6.29- 22.31)). By ethnicity, Chinese respondents reported the highest prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge (32.3% (95% CI: 25.99- 39.28)), followed by Malaysia (25.0% (95% CI: 22.47-27.77)) and other Bumiputeras (16.1% (95% CI: 11.39-22.18)). The prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge increased with increasing education level: primary education (12.5% (95% CI: 9.32-16.57)), secondary education (19.8% (95% CI: 17.06-22.96)), and tertiary education (36.5% (95% CI: 29.38-44.29)). Government employees showed a significantly higher prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge (43.2% (95% CI: 34.45-52.39)) compared to other occupational groups (Table 1).

Sociodemographic variables Un weighed count Estimated population Prevalence (%) 95% CI
        Lower Upper
Malaysia 692 5856527 22.6 19.67 25.85
Location
Urban 449 4983568 24.9 21.4 28.78
Rural 243 872959 14.8 11.82 18.42
Sex          
Male 325 3027947 22.7 19.46 26.34
Female 367 2828580 22.5 18.93 26.54
Age group
Less than 15 20 173773 12.2 6.29 22.31
15-19 38 324356 13.5 8.26 21.22
20-24 55 409404 14.4 9.99 20.24
25-29 48 580112 16.4 10.56 24.64
30-34 93 818948 29.6 22.85 37.3
35-39 79 747573 27.9 19.01 39.01
40-44 109 829170 40.3 32.19 49.05
45-49 76 492502 28.4 18.3 41.25
50 and above 174 1480689 23 18.51 28.13
Ethnicity 
Malay 490 3134053 25 22.47 27.77
Chinese 80 1833777 32.3 25.99 39.28
Indian 16 - - - -
Other Bumiputerasa 88 464566 16.1 11.39 22.18
Others 18 - - - -
Citizenship 
Malaysian citizen 675 5648184 24.8 21.98 27.83
Non-Malaysia citizen 17 - - - -
Education level
No formal education 6 - - - -
Primary education 80 690982 12.5 9.32 16.57
Secondary education 311 2239912 19.8 17.06 22.96
Tertiary education 295 2880538 36.5 29.38 44.29
Marital statusb
Single 173 1697527 19.2 15.2 23.98
Married 470 3743496 24.5 21.02 28.34
Widow(er)/divorcee 49 415504 23.4 15.47 33.67
Occupationc
Government employee 119 822052 43.2 34.45 52.39
Private employee 186 2037681 23.2 16.7 31.33
Self employed 123 944476 26.1 20.98 32.02
Unpaid worker/homemaker/caregiver 101 649954 17.1 12.93 22.31
Student 77 672365 17.8 12.28 25.06
Not working (unemployed, health problem, old age, child & retiree) 84 707542 18.2 13.83 23.63

Table 1: Prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge among respondents aged 13 years and above by sociodemographic characteristics.

Proportion of correct response to each item of HIV knowledge among respondents aged 13 years and above

The question on “Can the risk of HIV transmission be reduced by having sex with only one uninfected partner who has no other partners?” (Question 1) had the highest proportion of respondents who answered correctly (74.9% (95% CI: 69.52-79.67)) compared to other items. There was no significant difference across locality and age group (Table 2).

Sociodemographic variables Un weighted count Estimated population Prevalence (%) 95% CI
        Lower Upper
Malaysia 2387 19294771 74.9 69.52 79.67
Location
Urban 1346 14986699 75.4 68.42 81.3
Rural 1041 4308072 73.3 69.32 76.91
Age group 
Less than 15 100 987743 69.3 55.46 80.38
15-19 187 1637600 68 57.27 77.13
20-24 226 1808041 63.5 53.28 72.58
25-29 240 2509232 71.2 59.48 80.64
30-34 261 2202902 79.6 72.38 85.39
35-39 248 2087284 78 70.74 83.84
40-44 239 1695089 82.5 72.31 89.43
45-49 206 1461789 84.5 75.85 90.46
50 and above 680 4905093 77.7 73.12 81.67

Table 2: Proportion of correct response to question 1: “Can the risk of HIV transmission be reduced by having sex with only one uninfected partner who has no other partners?”.

A total of 69.5% of respondents gave a correct response to the question, “Can a person reduce the risk of getting HIV by using a condom every time they have sex?” (Question 2). There was no significant difference across locality and age group (Table 3).

Sociodemographic variables Un weighted count Estimated population Prevalence (%) 95% CI
        Lower Upper
Malaysia 2172 17708701 69.5 65.54 73.25
Location          
Urban 1230 13811288 70.4 65.28 75.1
Rural 942 3897412 66.5 63.48 69.48
Age group          
Less than 15 93 822524 58 47.81 67.46
15-19 159 1335344 55.5 47.22 63.48
20-24 188 1707788 60 51.05 68.42
25-29 209 2226463 63.4 53.69 72.2
30-34 251 2283377 82.6 77.62 86.67
35-39 237 1994388 75.5 67.96 81.77
40-44 221 1550947 75.4 67.56 81.93
45-49 191 1347970 79.6 70.33 86.57
50 and above 623 4439901 72.4 67.65 76.61

Table 3: Proportion of correct response to question 2: “Can a person reduce the risk of getting HIV by using a condom every time they have sex?”.

The question on “Can a healthy-looking person have HIV?” (Question 3) was correctly answered by 68.9% of respondents. A significantly higher proportion of respondents from urban areas (71.7% (95% CI: 66.46-76.37)) answered this question correctly compared to respondents from rural areas (59.8% (95% CI: 56.05- 63.41)). However, there was no significant difference observed between age groups (Table 4).

Sociodemographic variables Un weighted count Estimated population Prevalence (%) 95% CI
        Lower Upper
Malaysia 2142 17543340 68.9 64.88 72.73
Location
Urban 1273 14042968 71.7 66.46 76.37
Rural 869 3500372 59.8 56.05 63.41
Age group
Less than 15 93 924019 64.8 52.54 75.44
15-19 191 1649203 68.5 59.54 76.26
20-24 242 2118933 74.4 60.72 84.51
25-29 233 2347030 67.7 56.37 77.36
30-34 238 1929459 71.6 65.21 77.19
35-39 220 1916730 71.7 64.45 77.99
40-44 220 1652362 82.3 75.09 87.7
45-49 183 1128698 68.6 51.28 81.91
50 and above 522 3876906 61.7 57.87 65.46

Table 4: Proportion of correct response to question 3: “Can a healthy-looking person have HIV?”.

The question on “Can a person get HIV from mosquito bites?” (Question 4) had the second-highest proportion of being answered correctly by respondents (71.7% (95% CI: 68.79-74.37)). There was no significant difference across locality and age group (Table 5).

Sociodemographic variables Un weighted count Estimated population Prevalence (%) 95% CI
        Lower Upper
Malaysia 2271 18189480 71.7 68.79 74.37
Location 
Urban 1259 14087736 72 68.51 75.22
Rural 1012 4101744 70.6 65.78 74.99
Age group 
Less than 15 110 915573 64.8 46.07 79.88
15-19 206 1847092 76.7 70.62 81.87
20-24 222 1817111 64.3 54.88 72.71
25-29 230 2660335 77.4 69.75 83.64
30-34 235 1908963 69.2 61.91 75.67
35-39 243 2085754 78.8 72.94 83.65
40-44 229 1595546 78.4 71.34 84.18
45-49 178 1218689 73.1 65.21 79.76
50 and above 618 4140417 66.9 60.97 72.27

Table 5: Proportion of correct response to question 4: “Can a person get HIV from mosquito bites?”.

The proportion of respondents who answered the question “Can a person get HIV by sharing food with someone who is infected?” (Question 5) correctly was 62.0% (95% CI: 58.27-65.65). The proportion of respondents who gave a correct response to this question was significantly higher in urban areas (64.8% (95% CI: 60.46-68.98)) compared to their rural counterparts (52.6% (95% CI: 48.67-56.50)). No significant difference was observed between age groups (Table 6).

Sociodemographic variables Un weighted count Estimated population Prevalence (%) 95% CI
        Lower Upper
Malaysia 1876 15824929 62 58.27 65.65
Location
Urban 1094 12743518 64.8 60.46 68.98
Rural 782 3081411 52.6 48.67 56.5
Age group
Less than 15 64 621366 43.7 31.09 57.17
15-19 121 1074698 45.2 37.98 52.66
20-24 167 1679290 59.1 51.77 66.11
25-29 165 1938025 55.6 47.81 63.18
30-34 216 1928309 70.8 64.8 76.07
35-39 213 1743227 66.1 57.94 73.48
40-44 225 1597025 78.1 71.61 83.47
45-49 179 1286695 76.5 66.59 84.14
50 and above 526 3956295 62.8 56.45 68.71

Table 6: Proportion of correct response to question 5: “Can a person get HIV by sharing food with someone who is infected?”.

Discussion

In Malaysia, HIV/AIDS knowledge is increasing in rural areas, even though the proportion of HIV/AIDS knowledge in this cluster is much lower than in urban areas. HIV/AIDS is greatly influenced by a variety of socioeconomic and demographic factors. However, it is challenging to increase HIV awareness in rural Malaysia through accurate knowledge because the country needs to improve the educational environment in its underdeveloped rural areas, where HIV knowledge and belief are both lacking. According to the study’s findings, both urban and rural Malaysians have a high level of knowledge about HIV transmission.

Almost all participants in urban and rural areas are aware that HIV transmission can be reduced by having sex with only one uninfected partner and by using a condom every time they engage in sexual activity. They are also knowledgeable regarding the fact that HIV cannot be transmitted through mosquito bites. A significant number of rural participants disagree with the statements can a healthy-looking person have HIV and can someone contract HIV by sharing food with an infected person [10]. Additionally, there are very few prejudices in urban areas. Prior efforts have revealed a significantly higher HIV prevalence among individuals who are unaware of and have inadequate knowledge of the potential routes of HIV transmission [11].

Conclusion

Overall, the prevalence of adequate HIV knowledge in Malaysia was low, especially among young people. Misconceptions about HIV transmission and prevention among young people are still common. The findings from this survey have important implications for the development of primary HIV/AIDS prevention programs and HIV educational campaigns to increase knowledge and dispel misconceptions about HIV. Such education and intervention programs should target rural areas, the young adult population, less educated, and unemployed groups.

Ethical Consideration

The study was conducted after approval had been obtained from The Medical Research & Ethics Committee (MREC), Ministry of Health Malaysia. All participants were informed of the objective of the study and verbal consents were received from the respondents for interview.

Conflict of Interest

None to report.

References

Citation: Hasim MH, Kassim MSA, Ahmad FH, Sahril N, Ying CY, Mang CY, et al. (2023) Assessing of HIV Knowledge in Comparison to Urban and Rural in Malaysia: Findings of National Health Morbidity Survey in 2020. Bio Med. 15:531.

Copyright: © 2023 Hasim MH, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.