Awards Nomination 20+ Million Readerbase
Indexed In
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • CiteFactor
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • Hamdard University
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Scholarsteer
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Share This Page
Journal Flyer
Flyer image

Research Article - (2018) Volume 9, Issue 9

Susceptibility of White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) Tuber to Rot Fungi and Control with Extracts of Zingiber officinale Rosc. Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Piper guineense Schumach

Gwa VI1,2* and Richard IB1,3
1Department of Crop and Environmental Protection, Federal University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria
2Faculty of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University, Dutsin-Ma, Katsina State, Nigeria
3Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Crop Protection, University of Maiduguri, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author: Gwa VI, Department of Crop and Environmental Protection, Federal University of Agriculture, PM B 2373 Makurdi, Nigeria, Tel: +2348039357109 Email:


Isolation, identification and control of fungal pathogens of Ogoja yam tubers collected from Benue and Nasarawa States, Nigeria were studied between December, 2015 and April, 2017. Fungi identified from the rotted samples were: Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, A. ochraceus, Botryodiplodia theobromae, Curvularia eragrostide, Colletotrichum sp, Fusarium moniliforme, F. oxysporum, F. solani, Penicillium expensum, Pestalotia sp. and P. purpurogenum. Fungi with the highest mean frequency of occurrence were A. niger (21.84%), B. theobromae (19.10%), A. flavus (16.84%) and F. oxysporum (15.49%) while the least were Colletotrichum sp. (1.36%) and P. expansum (1.49%). Tests of pathogenicity carried out on the head and tail regions of the Ogoja yam tubers showed that the head was more susceptible than the tail and all the fungi elicited rot when tested on healthy tubers of yam. Fungi with the highest rot depth both at the head and tail regions were A. niger (23.00 mm, 27.33 mm), A. flavus (16.33 mm, 21.00 mm) and B. theobromae (9.33 mm, 11.33 mm) while the least virulent were Colletotrichum sp. (5.00 mm, 6.66 mm) and P. purpurogenum (4.00 mm, 7.66 mm), respectively. Extract application of leaves of Carica papaya Lam. (pawpaw), rhizomes of Zingiber officinale Rosc. (Ginger), Piper guineense Schumach. (Black peper), Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (neem), and leaves of Nicotiana tabacum Linn. (Tobacco) on tubers before storing for five months showed high level of potency in controlling rot pathogens. These plant extracts could therefore, be applied on tubers to prolong their shelf life.

Keywords: Identification; Isolation; Ogoja; Pathogenicity tests; Plant extracts; Rot


Cultivated yams are members of the family Dioscoreaceae. African, Asian and South American countries are the major producers of yams in the world as reported by Okigbo and Ogbonnaya [1], FAO [2]. Varieties of yam that are mostly produced are Dioscorea rotundata (white yam) and D. alata (water yam). Statistics have shown that Nigeria is the most consistent and largest producer of yams. Annual output in Nigeria equals 38.92 million metric tonnes [3,4]. Pathogens such as bacteria, fungi, viruses and nematodes are responsible for rots in yams at different stages of growth and storage [5-9]. The pathogens reduced growth, quantity and quality of yam [8,10-13]. Rot initiated by pathogens in yam tubers ranged from 10% to 15% after three months of storage [14-16] estimated the losses to be as high as 50% in storage in Nigeria. Pathogens commonly implicated with diseases in yam at various stages of growth included: Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, A. ochraceus, Botryodiplodia theobromae, Colletotrichum spp, Curvularia eragrostide, Fusarium moniliforme, F. oxysporum, F. solani, Rhizoctonia spp, Rhizopus nodosus, Penicillium expansum, P. digitatum, P. oxalicum, P. purpurogenum [8-10,17-23]. There are different types of pesticidesthat are currently in use to control plant pathogens which included chemical fungicides and plant extracts. These chemicals have been found to cause soil pollution, surface and ground water contamination as well as development of resistance by the target organisms [24]. Plant materials as well as antagonistic organisms are the popular options to the use of chemical fungicides [25-29]. Phytochemical compounds synthesized by plants are known to have inhibitory properties against plant pathogenic organisms at different stages of growth and in storage life of crops such as yam, cassava, tomato, cowpea, rice, etc [9,30,31]. Plant products are locally available, biodegradable, little toxicity and are easy to prepare by local farmers [19,32]. The study therefore, aimed at identifying the different pathogens associated with rots in yam tubers and the use of plant materials to control these pathogens and prolong the lifespan of yam in storage.

Materials and Methods

Study area

The location lies between latitudes 8°30’ and 9°30’ N, and on longitudes 7°20´ and 8°45´ E in the North central region of Nigeria called ‘Middle belt’. The area covers four major yam producing settlements in four local government areas that cut across two States in the derived guinea savannah of Nigeria; the locations are Tor-Donga in Katsina-Ala and Zaki-Biam in Ukum local government areas of Benue State, respectively as well as Lafia in Lafia local government area and Kadarko in Keana local government area of Nasarawa State, respectively.

Collection of decayed yam tubers

Decayed tubers of Ogoja white yam variety with characteristics rot symptoms were got from yam farmers’ storage barns at four locations between December, 2015 and April, 2017. Decayed tubers were sampled and neatly collected and assembled in sterilized polyethylene bags and conveyed to the University laboratory after which isolation and identification of the fungal pathogens were made.

Identification of fungal pathogens

Decayed yam tissues were cut about 2 mm diameter at the edge of infected portions with sterile scalpel. Cut tissues were surface sterilized in 5% Sodium hypochlorite (Commercial bleach) solution for few minutes. Cut sections were removed and dipped in sterile water to remove the chemical [9]. The sterilized sections were dried on sterile Whatman No.42 filter paper (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 minutes before inoculation of the plates. Four sections of the sterilized tissue pieces were plated out in the solidified Potato Dextrose Agar. Incubated plates were kept at ambient room temperature (30°C ± 5°C) for a period of five days for adequate growth of fungal mycelial [19]. Different fungal colonies that grew on the plates were carefully sub cultured on new sterile PDA plates for pure culture to grow. Identified fungi were purified and subsequently multiplied on PDA. Morphological identification was done to ascertain the identities of the fungi with the aid of compound microscope and identification books [33-35].

Frequency of occurrence of fungi

Frequencies of occurrence of isolates were determined periodically. Fungi organisms were isolated and identified at monthly interval, record of fungi isolated were kept periodically and the number of times of occurrence of a particular fungus was calculated as a percentage of all fungi organisms isolated at a particular time [34], hence expressed as:



Y=Number of times of occurrence of each fungal isolate at a particular time.

Z=Total number of times of occurrence of all fungi organisms isolated over a given period.

Pathogenicity test

Good looking Ogoja varieties of yam tubers (Discorea rotundata) were collected and neatly washed using clean tap water to get rid of dirt. 5% Sodium hypochlorite solution was used to further disinfect the tubers for up to 2 minutes before the tubers were rinsed in four successive changes of sterile water to remove chemicals [22,23]. Sterile filter papers were used to dry the tubers for about 20 minutes in the Laminar Air flow cabinet. A five day old culture of the fungal isolates grown on potato dextrose agar collected for deteriorated tubers was used as inoculum for pathogenicity tests. A 5 mm diameter cork borer was used to remove 4 mm tissue from the healthy tuber surfaces aseptically from the “head” and “tail” regions of each yam tuber [36]. A cork borer of 5 mm diameter size which was sterilized by dipping in alcohol followed by flaming, the cork borer was allowed to cool before it was used to obtain inoculum from the five-day old cultures of the fungi. Fungal plugs that were cut were inserted into the holes created in the tubers. A portion of the tuber flesh removed earlier was cut off to give way for inoculum size and the remaining tuber flesh was used to plug the remaining parts of the hole made in the yam tubers. Sterile petroleum jelly was used to cover the edges of the inoculated yam tissues. This process prevented any external influence on the positioned inoculum. The procedure was repeated for the control but instead of inserting inoculum in the holes created, uninoculated discs of PDA were inserted in the holes made in the yam tubers [37]. The treatments comprised twelve isolates from rotted yam tubers and a control inoculated at the two regions of Ogoja yam. The experimental design was a 2× 13 factorial which was replicated three times for all the pathogens. Inoculated yam tubers were completely randomized [38] and placed at room temperature under sterile condition for 14 days for rot to establish. The extent of rot was calculated by using a clean knife to cut open the inoculated yam tubers at the point of inoculation. A sterilized transparent ruler was used to measure the depth of rot. Actual depth was calculated with the formula of Ezeibekwe and Ibe [39] with some modifications:

X = Y-Z


X=Actual depth

Y=Final depth

Z=Initial depth

The formula was modified to read as:


Preparation of plant materials

The preparations of plant materials were done using the methods of Gwa and Akombo [19] Seeds of Piper guineense Linn., leaves of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and rhizomes of Zingiber officinale Rosc. were properly washed in clean water, dried and ground using mortar and pestle. About 30 g, 60 g and 90 g of the ground plant materials were each added to 1litre of sterile hot water (100°C) in 1500 Ml Pyrex flask. Mixtures were stirred and left for 24 hours after which they were filtered using four-fold sterile cheese cloth. Concentrations of 30 g/L, 60 g/L and 90 g/L, respectively were made from each of the mixtures of plant extract. Mancozeb (synthetic chemical) was prepared by dissolving 4 g of the chemical in 1L of sterile cold distilled water to obtain 4 g/L concentration. Efficacies of the plant extracts as well as mancozeb were compared for their abilities to inhibit growth of fungal pathogens in storage.

Effect of some plant extracts and mancozeb on storage pathogens

Potency of leaves of A. indica (neem), seeds of P. guineense(black pepper), rhizomes of Z. officinale (ginger) and mancozeb (chemical fungicides) were applied on yam tubers in storage to see their effects on rot pathogens. Plant extracts were prepared as described above and were sprayed on Ogoja white yam tubers using a hand sprayer at concentrations of 30 g/L, 60 g/L and 90 g/L, respectively. Application of mannose on the yam tubers was at 4 g/L. Tubers were left to dry at ambient room temperature for 1 hour and were taken to storage barns and stored for a period of five months. Three tubers of yam made up a treatment and were replicated three times giving a sum of 9 tubers. The 11 treatments comprised of three plant extracts at three concentrations each, mancozeb and a control. The experiment was made of a total of 99 Ogoja yam tubers. Completely randomized design was used for the treatments but the control experiment had only sterile distilled water in place of plant extract or chemical which was used to sprinkle on the yam tubers before storing them. Potencies of the extracts and mancozeb in controlling rot causing microbes throughout the study period was determined using the data got for the period of five months. Tubers of yam that were not rotted and those that were rotted in each treatment were determined. Efficacy of plant extracts and mannose at their various levels of concentrations in controlling rot pathogens of yam in store were tested using the Decay Reduction Index formula developed by Amadioha [40] as:


Data analysis

Data collected were subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using GenStat Discovery Edition 12 for mean separation. Graph Pad Prism 6 was used for trend graphs and means were separated using Fisher’s least significant differences (F-LSD) at p ≤ 0.05 [41].


Identification of yam pathogens

Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, A. ochraceus, Botryodiplodia theobromae, Curvularia eragrostide, Colletotrichum sp Fusarium moniliforme, F. oxysporum, F. solani, Pestalotia sp, Penicillium purpurogenum and P. expansum were got from rotted Ogoja tubers from Nasarawa and Benue States of Nigeria.

Determination of frequency of pathogens

Table 1 shows the occurrence of yam pathogens across the locations. The most frequently occurred pathogens are A. niger (21.84%) followed by B. theobromae (19.10%), A. flavus (16.84%), F. oxysporum (15.49%) and so on while the least frequently occurred pathogenic fungi are Colletotrichum sp. (1.36%) followed by P. expansum (1.49%) and C. eragrostide (2.47%).

Pathogen Location and frequency of occurrence (%) Mean
Kadarko Lafia Tor-Donga Zaki-Biam
A. niger 20.08 ± 0.90b 22.90 ± 0.92a 22.93 ± 0.57a 21.43 ± 0.71ab 21.84 ± 0.43
B. theobromae 18.34 ± 0.62b 20.37 ± 0.60ab 15.46 ± 0.74c 22.22 ± 1.10a 19.10 ± 0.58
A. flavus 16.44 ± 0.35a 19.06 ± 1.11a 15.72 ± 0.77b 16.15 ± 1.52a 16.84 ± 0.54
F. oxysporum 16.33 ± 0.58a 16.15 ± 0.70a 15.22 ± 0.80a 14.24 ± 0.61b 15.49 ± 0.35
F. moniliforme 10.35 ± 0.56a 11.26 ± 0.64a 11.66 ± 0.57a 6.24 ± 1.62b 9.87 ± 0.59
P. purpurogenum NE 4.73 ± 1.81ns 6.71 ± 0.43ns 4.23 ± 1.18ns 3.92 ± 0.68
Pestalotia sp NE NE 7.19ns 3.47ns 2.66 ± 0.58
A. ochraceus 3.42 ± 0.99b NE 6.69 ± 0.35a NE 2.59 ± 0.54
F. solani 10.01 ± 0.53 NE NE NE 2.50 ± 0.25
C. eragrostide 5.53 ± 0.60b 4.37 ± 0.44a NE NE 2.47 ± 0.53
P. expansum NE NE NE 5.99 ± 0.60ns 1.49 ± 0.48
Colletotrichum sp 4.32 ± 0.70 1.14 ± 1.61 NE NE 1.36 ± 0.26

Means occurring on same row but with unlike superscript a, b and c are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05); NE=Not Encountered; ns=Not Significant

Table 1: Mean percentage frequency of isolated fungal pathogens from Ogoja white yam tuber at different locations for four months.

Pathogenicity tests

Tests of pathogenicity of some identified fungi are presented in Figure 1. Fungal organisms tested on the two regions (head and tail) of healthy Ogoja yam tubers included A. flavus, A. niger, B. theobromae, C. eragrostide, F. oxysporum and P. expansum. Differences were observedin the pathogenic potency of the different fungal isolates tested at different regions of yams. The tests showed that all the isolates induced rot at both regions of the Ogoja tubers 14 days after inoculation of the tubers with the test pathogens. Yams were observed to show symptoms of infection. Tubers that were not inoculated with rot causing fungi did not produced symptoms of rot (Figure 1).


Figure 1: Effect of the fungal pathogens on rot development at different regions of yam tubers.

Effect of the fungal pathogens on rot development at different regions of yam tubers

The fungi that proved most potent in causing rot both at the head and tail regions were A. niger followed by A. flavus, B. theobromae and F. solani while the least virulent were Colletotrichum sp., A. ochraceus and P. purpurogenum (Table 2). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were observed in rot development and spread between head and control and between tail and control regions for all the fungal pathogens tested on Ogoja yam tubers. Data obtained and analysed revealed that rot depths were higher at the tail regions of the yam tubers in comparison with the head regions for any of the tested pathogen (Table 3). Each of the isolates induced rot on the head region but there was no rot observed on the head region where no organism was inoculated (control). Similarly, the tail regions inoculated with different isolates also induced varying degrees of rots but no rots were observed on the control tubers where no organism was inoculated. At the head region, A. niger (22.19%) was more virulent followed by A. flavus (15.76%), B. theobromae (9.00%) and F. solani (8.68%) while the least virulentisolates were P. purpurogenum (3.86%) and A. ochraceus (4.18%). The tail region of yam tubers showed a similar trend of susceptibility to the pathogens but the least virulent isolates were Colletotrichum sp. (4.92%) and A. ochraceus (5.17%). Comparison of the virulence of the isolates on the head and tail regions of the Ogoja tubers inoculated with different pathogenic fungal showed significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) only in A. ochraceus and P. purpurogenum (Table 3).

Pathogens Head Mean Rot Depth (mm) and Percentage Rot (%)
Tail % Head % Tail
A. flavus 16.33 ± 0.88b 21.00 ± 1.53b 15.76 15.52
A. niger 23.00 ± 1.53a 27.33 ± 2.85a 22.19 20.2
A. ochraceus 4.33 ± 0.66e 7.00 ± 0.57d 4.18 5.17
B. theobromae 9.33 ± 1.76c 11.33 ± 1.67c 9 8.37
C. eragrostide 7.66 ± 0.88cd 9.33 ± 1.45cd 7.39 6.9
Colletotrichum sp 5.00 ± 0.57de 6.66 ± 0.88d 4.82 4.92
F. moniliforme 6.33 ± 1.76cde 8.33 ± 1.45cd 6.11 6.16
F. oxysporum 5.66 ± 0.33de 8.00 ± 1.53cd 5.46 5.91
F. solani 9.00 ± 0.57c 10.67 ± 0.88cd 8.68 7.89
P. expansum 6.66 ± 0.33cde 9.66 ± 0.88cd 6.43 7.14
P. purpurogenum 4.00 ± 0.57e 7.66 ± 0.88cd 3.86 5.66
Pestalotia sp 6.33 ± 1.45cde 8.33 ± 1.45cd 6.11 6.16
Control 0.00 ± 0.00f 0.00 ± 0.00e - -

Means occurring on same column with unlike superscript a, b, c, d, e and f are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05)

Table 2: Mean rot depth and percentage rot caused by different fungal pathogens in different regions of Ogoja white yam tuber after 14 days of incubation.

Pathogens Mean Rot Development (mm) p-Value
Head Tail
A. flavus 16.33 ± 0.88 21.00 ± 1.53 0.07
A. niger 23.00 ± 1.53 27.33 ± 2.85 0.27
A. ochraceus 4.33 ± 0.66 7.00 ± 0.57 0.05*
B. theobromae 9.33 ± 1.76 11.33 ± 1.67 0.47
C. eragrostide 7.66 ± 0.88 9.33 ± 1.45 0.39
Colletotrichum sp 5.00 ± 0.57 6.66 ± 0.88 0.21
F. moniliforme 6.33 ± 1.76 8.33 ± 1.45 0.41
F. oxysporum 5.66 ± 0.33 8.00 ± 1.53 0.27
F. solani 9.00 ± 0.57 10.67 ± 0.88 0.21
P. expansum 6.66 ± 0.33 9.66 ± 0.88 0.08
P. purpurogenum 4.00 ± 0.57 7.66 ± 0.88 0.04*
Pestalotia sp 6.33 ± 1.45 8.33 ± 1.45 0.38
Control 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 --

*Significantly different (0.05%)

Table 3: Pathogenicity tests of some fungal pathogens showing rot development (mm) at head and tail regions of Ogoja tuber after 14 days of incubation.

Effect of extracts of plant and mancozeb on stored Ogoja yam tubers

Results presented in Table 4 show the activity of 30 g/L, 60 g/L and 90 g/L of plant extracts and 4 g/L of chemical fungicide on rot pathogens of stored Ogoja yam tubers for five months in two years. Findings showed average decay reduction index (DRI) of 0.00 (control), 0.73 (mancozeb), 0.52 (A. indica), 0.51 (P. guineense) and 0.51 (Z. officinale) were recorded from December, 2015 to April, 2016. Mean DRI of 0.00 (control), 0.86 (mancozeb), 0.54 (A. indica), 0.64 (P. guineense) and 0.72 (Z. officinale) were recorded from December, 2016 to April, 2017. Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were not observed between first and second years of storage in all the plant extracts for each month of storage of the tubers. On the other hand, significant differences in means were observed for both years. Mean differences between the first year and second year of storage for mancozeb and the different plant extracts were significantly difference (p ≤ 0.05) only in mancozeb and Z. officinale.

Period of Storage Plant Extract LSD
Mancozeb® N. tabacum P. guineense Z. officianale
1st Year
December, 2015 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 --
January, 2016 0.66 ± 0.33 0.55 ± 0.17 0.66 ± 0.16 0.55 ± 0.17 0.61ns
February, 2016 1.00 ± 0.00 0.72 ± 0.14 0.66 ± 0.14 0.66 ± 0.14 0.48ns
March, 2016 1.00 ± 0.00 0.72 ± 0.14 0.61 ± 0.13 0.66 ± 0.14 0.48ns
April, 2016 1.00 ± 0.00 0.61 ± 0.16 0.61 ± 0.13 0.66 ± 0.14 0.50ns
Mean (1st Year) 0.73 ± 0.06 0.52 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.09 0.51 ± 0.10 0.32ns
2nd Year
December, 2016 0.66 ± 0.33 0.66 ± 0.16 0.55 ± 0.17 0.66 ± 0.16 0.60ns
January, 2017 0.66 ± 0.33 0.33 ± 0.16 0.44 ± 0.17 0.55 ± 0.17 0.61ns
February, 2017 1.00 ± 0.00 0.55 ± 0.17 0.77 ± 0.14 0.77 ± 0.14 0.52ns
March, 2017 1.00 ± 0.00 0.55 ± 0.17 0.66 ± 0.16 0.77 ± 0.14 0.55ns
April, 2017 1.00 ± 0.00 0.61 ± 0.13 0.77 ± 0.12 0.83 ± 0.08 0.39ns
Mean (2nd Year) 0.86 ± 0.13 0.54 ± 0.12 0.64 ± 0.11 0.72 ± 0.08 0.37ns
Mean (both Years) 0.80 ± 0.05a 0.53 ± 0.08b 0.57 ± 0.08ab 0.61 ± 0.05ab 0.26
Difference between Years
1st Year 0.73 ± 0.06b 0.52 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.09 0.51 ± 0.10b --
2nd Year 0.86 ± 0.13a 0.54 ± 0.12 0.64 ± 0.11 0.72 ± 0.08a
LSD 0.12 0.15ns 0.20ns 0.12

Means occurring on same row (comparing plant extracts) and column (comparing year of storage) with unlike superscript a, b and c are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05); ns=Not Significant

Table 4: Mean decay reduction index (DRI) of mancozeb and plant extracts on Ogoja yam tubers after two years of storage.

Effect of mancozeb and plant extracts in controlling pathogens on Ogoja tuber

Figure 2 presents the effect of concentrations of P. guineense, A. indica, Z. officinale and mancozeb in controlling rot fungi of Ogoja yamtubers in storage for five months. Results of extract of P. guineense at 30 g/L reviewed the decay reduction index from lowest in December, 2015 to highest in January, 2016, respectively. At concentration of 60 g/L, DRI was 0.83 for February, 2016 and 0.50 each for March and April, 2016. Concentration of 90 g/L produced the highest effect in March, 2016 and April, 2016 but was however, low in January and February, 2016. The activity of Z. officinale at 30 g/L was the same throughout the period of storage except December, 2015 but differed significantly when 60 g/L and 90 g/L concentrations were used. The performance of A. indica at 30 g/L was comparatively better in February and March,2016 to 60 g/L and 90 g/L with a DRI of 0.66 during the period of storage. Mancozeb had the least DRI in January, 2016 but became better in inhibiting rot pathogens in February, March and April, 2016. Rots were not recorded in December, 2015 in spite of the different concentrations of plant extracts tested.


Figure 2: Decay reduction index of P. guineense, Z. officinale, A. indica and mancozeb in controlling rot fungi of Ogoja white yam tuber after five months of storage.


Pathogenic fungi found inciting rot on yam tubers at the various locations were Penicillium expensum, P. purpurogenum, Pestalotia sp, Botryodiplodia theobromae, Curvularia eragrostide, Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, A. ochraceus, Colletotrichum sp, Fusarium moniliforme, F. oxysporum and F. solan. Reports have shown that these fungi constitutethe major treat to post harvest deterioration of yam and other crops in different parts of Nigeria [8,18,21,22,24,42]. Fungi with consistent higher frequency of occurrence in the locations included; A. niger, followed by B. theobromae, A. flavus, F. oxysporum, F. moniliform. This finding is in agreement with results obtained by Ogaraku and Usman [42], Okigbo et al. [12], Ogunleye and Ayansola [18], Okigbo et al. [7], Gwa and Nwankiti [22], Gwa et al. [23] who reported these fungi as major cause of rot in yam tuber in different parts of Nigeria. Findings revealed that the rot-causing fungi that appeared less included C. eragrostide, P. expansum and Colletotrichum sp which correspond withfindings obtained by Ogunleye and Ayansola [18] and Okigbo et al., [7]. Result got by Ogunleye and Ayansola [18] on fungi pathogens infecting Dioscorea sp in Bodija, Ibaban, Oyo State, revealed that A. ochraceus and Penicillium sp. were the least occurred fungi with percentage frequencies of 2.14% and 6.43%, respectively which agreed with our findings. Conversely, Amusa [43] showed that C. gloeosporiodes had higher percentage of occurrence of 98% on white yam leaves compared to just 4.31% got from this finding on yam tubers. Pathogenicity test revealed that A. niger, A. flavus, B. theobromae and F. solani are the most virulent fungi causing rot in the healthy Ogoja yam tubers both at the head and tail regions compared with the less virulent P. purpurogenum, F. oxysporum and P. expansum. Tests suggest that thesefungi pathogens could be the leading cause of postharvest decay of yam tubers in various parts of Nigeria especially in Benue and Nasarawa States from where all the rotted yam tubers were collected. The results have demonstrated that susceptibility of healthy tubers of yam to rot fungi increased from the head to the tail regions of the tubers; significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were not observed in rot between head and tail regions caused by A. flavus, A. niger, B. theobromae, Colletotrichum sp., C. eragrostide, F. moniliforme, F. oxysporum, F. solani, P. expansum and Pestalotia sp. but significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were however, observed in rot between head and tail in the least virulent A. ochraceus and P. purpurogenum. This study is in consonance with results got by Awuah and Akrasi [44] who studied the suppression of yam tuber rot caused by A. niger by yam rhizobacterium and reported that the rot development was higher at the tail region compared with the head region when inoculated with the fungus. The study is similar to the work of Taiga [36] who studied the differential rate of dry rot in white yam along the tuber length caused by rot pathogens and found out that the depth of rot caused by A. niger, P. oxalicum and Rhizopus stolonifer were higher in tail followed by middle and least in the head regions of yam tuber and none of the regions of yam for any of the pathogen tested significantly differed from one another. According to Arinze [45] differences in the susceptibility of the various yam regions to pathogens may be due to variable distribution of phytoalexins within the head, middle and tail regions of the tuber. Emehute et al. [46] on the other hand, suggested that variation in the water contents of the various tuber regions, with the head having the least, could be responsible for these differences in the severity of rot caused by the pathogens. It is likely that the low rot severity recorded by some of the pathogens on Ogoja tuber may be caused by the production of phytoalaxins in theyam which resisted the advancement of these pathogens. Efficacy of Z. officinale, P. guineense and A. indica as well as mancozeb in controllingrot fungi of stored Ogoja tubers for five months demonstrated that both mancozeb and the plant extracts possess antimicrobial activities capable of inhibiting the growth of pathogens at different concentrations. The differences in potency of Z. officinale, P. guineense and A. indica may be attributed to a build-up of phytochemical nutrients in the various plant extracts [47]. A record of 0.51 decay reduction index indicates that at least 51% control was achieved using some selected plant extracts and chemical fungicide in managing yam pathogens in storage for five months. The result supports the work of Okigbo et al. [12] who found rot reduction as high as 62.80% in yam tubers with A. sativum. The work also agreed with result obtained by Gwa and Akombo [19], Gwa and Nwankiti [9], Gwa [23], Gwa and Nwankiti [22] and Gwa et al. [23] on inhibition of A. flavus, Colletotrichum sp, B. theobromae, F. oxysporum, C. eragrostide and P. expansum, respectively using extractderived from P. guineense, Z. officinale A. indica, N. tabacum and C. papaya. Hycenth [48] reported that A. indica had inhibitory effecton Rhizopus stolonifer which is also responsible for causing rot of yam tubers. Bonire [49] showed that postharvest losses in yam could go as high as 40%. In the views of Okigbo and Ikediugwu [50] from 20 to 39.5% of stored tubers are lost to pathogens in storage. Arinze [15] and Okigbo et al. [16] showed that about 50% of the yam tubers harvested in Nigeria is lost in storage due to pathogenic infection. The result showed that increase in concentration of plant extracts resulted to decrease in rot indicating an increase in decay reduction index. This increase in concentrations of the extracts implied an increase in the active ingredients of the extracts which acted on the rot pathogens thereby affecting its physiological processes and consequently lowering the infective capability of the pathogens. This study has also confirmed and established the antifungal activity of these plant extracts, which are interestingly systemic in action and can be used or applied as post-harvest tuber treatment against rot causing pathogens of yams.


The study reviewed that rot of Ogoja yam tubers is caused by different fungal pathogens in storage. Results have also demonstrated that P. guineense, Z. officinale and A. indica may contain phytochemical compounds capable of inhibiting pathogens of yam in storage and comparing with the conventional fungicide (mancozeb); have proved effective against rot inducing pathogens of stored yam tubers. In conclusion, P. guineense, Z. officinale and A. indica are good plant that can be used to inhibit the growth of yam pathogens in storage and extend longevity of the tubers.


  1. Okigbo RN, Ogbonnaya OU (2006) Antifungal effects of two tropical plants extract (Ocimum gratissimum and Afromaomum melegueta) on postharvest yam (Dioscorea spp.) rot. Afr J Biotechnol 5: 727-731.
  2. Food and Agricultural Organization (2013) Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations.
  3. Food and Agriculture Organisation (2008) Production year book FAO Rome.
  4. Kleih U, Phillips D, Ogbonna M, Siwoku B (2012) Nigeria-scoping yam value chain analysis. Yam Improvement for Income and Food Security in West Africa pp: 1-53
  5. Okigbo RN, Agbata CA, Echezona CE (2010) Effect of leaf extract of Azadirachta indica and Chromolaena odorata on post-harvest spoilage fungi of yams in storage. Current Res J of Soil Sci 2: 9-12.
  6. Ayanwuyi E, Akinboye AO, Oyetoro JO (2011) Yam production in Orire local government area of Oyo State, Nigeria: Farmer’s perceived constraints. World J Young Res 1: 16-21.
  7. Okigbo NR, Enweremadu CE, Agu CK, Irondi RC, Okeke BC, et al. (2015) Control of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) rot pathogen using peel extract of water yam (Dioscorea alata) Adv App Sci Res 6: 7-13.
  8. Gwa VI, Bem AA, Okoro JK (2015) Yams (Dioscorea rotundata Poir and D. alata Lam.) fungi etiology in Katsina-Ala Local Government Area of Benue State, Nige J Phytopatho and Plant Health 3: 38-43.
  9. Gwa VI, Nwankiti AO (2017a) Efficacy of some plant extracts in in-vitro control of Colletotrichum species, causal agent of yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) tuber rot. Asi J Plant Sci and Res 7: 8-16.
  10. Amusa NA, Adegbite AA, Muhammed S, Baiyewu RA (2003) Yam diseases and its management in Nigeria. Afr J Biotech 2: 497-502.
  11. Arinze AE (2005) Plant pathology and post –harvest food loss. An Inaugural Lecture Series 43: 29-72.
  12. Okigbo RN, Putheti R, Achusi CT (2009a) Post-harvest deterioration of cassava and its control using extracts of Azadirachta indica and Afromonium meleguata. E-J Chem 6: 1274-1280.
  13. Taiga A (2011) Comparative studies of the efficacy of some selected fungicidal aqueous plant extracts on yam tuber dry rot disease. Ann Biol Res 2: 332-336.
  14. Ekundayo JA, Naqvi SH (1972) Pre-harvest microbial rotting of yam (Dioscorea spp) in Nigeria. Trans-British Mycolological Society 58: 15-18.
  15. Amaeze NJ, Ezeh PA, Dan-kishiya AS (2013) Evaluation of garlic (Allium Sativum) and uziza (Piper Guineense) on the control of tuber rot fungi of potato and carrot. Ame J Rese Communi 1: 167-174.
  16. Okigbo RN, Anuagasi CL, Amadi JE (2009b) Advances in selected medicinal and aromatic plants indigenous to Africa. J Medici Plant Res 3: 86-95.
  17. Markson AA, Amadioha AC, Omosun G, Madunagu BE, Udo SE, et al. (2012) Control of Botryodiplodia theobromae causing tissue rot of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir). Scholarly J Agri Sci pp: 1-7.
  18. Ogunleye AO, Ayansola OT (2014) Studies of some isolated rot-causing mycoflora of yams (Dioscorea Spp.). Amer J Microb and Biot 1: 9-20.
  19. Gwa VI, Akombo RA (2016) Studies on the antimicrobial potency of five crude plant extracts and chemical fungicide in in vitro control of Aspergillus flavus, causal agent of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) tuber rot. J Plant Sci and Agricultural Res 1: 1-8.
  20. Gwa VI, Ekefan EJ (2017) Fungal organisms isolated from rotted white yam (Dioscrea rotundata) tubers and antagonistic potential of Trichoderma harzianum against Colletotrichum Species. Agri Res & Tech Open Access J 10: 555787.
  21. Gwa VI (2018) Fungitoxic activities of plant extracts on mycelial growth inhibition of Fusarium Oxysporum causal agent yam tuber rot in Zaki-Biam, Benue State, Nigeria. J Pestici and Bioferti 1: 1-6.
  22. Gwa VI, Nwankiti AO (2018b) In vitro and in vivo antimicrobial potency of selected plant extracts in the control of postharvest rot-causing pathogens of yam tubers in storage. Global J Pests Dis Crop Protection 6: 276-287.
  23. Gwa VI, Nwankiti AO, Ekefan EJ (2018) Antifungal effect of five aqueous plant extracts on mycelial growth of Penicillium expansum isolated from rotted yam tubers in storage. Acta Scientific Agri 2: 65-70.
  24. Kumar AS, Reddy NPE, Reddy KH, Devi MC (2007) Evaluation of fungicidal resistance among Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates causing mango anthracnose in Agric. Export Zone of Andhra Pradesh, India Plant Path Bull 16: 157‒160.
  25. Okigbo RN, Emeka AN (2010) Biological control of rot: Inducing fungi of water yam (Dioscorea alata) with Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas chlororaphis. J Stored Products Postharvest Res 1: 18-23.
  26. Gwa VI, Abdulkadir KH (2017) Biological control using Trichoderma harzianum against Penicillium purpurogenum, causal agent of white yam tuber (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) rot. J Biores Commun 1: 1-6.
  27. Gwa VI, Ekefan EJ, Nwankiti AO (2017) Antifungal potency of some plant extracts in the control of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata poir) tuber rot. Adv Biotech & Micro 7: 555703.
  28. Gwa VI, Nwankiti AO (2017b) In vitro antagonistic potential of Trichoderma harzianum for biological control of Fusarium moniliforme isolated from Dioscorea rotundata tubers. Virol-mycol 6: 1-8.
  29. Nwankiti AO, Gwa VI (2018) Evaluation of antagonistic effect of Trichoderma Harzianum against Fusarium oxysporum causal agent of white yam (Dioscorearotundata poir) tuber rot. Trends Tech Sci Res 1: 54.
  30. Bediakao A, Showemimo FA, Asiamo YO, Amewowor D (2007) In vitro analysis of growth media and the control of yam minisett-rot. Biotechnology 6: 1- 4.
  31. Mamkaa DP, Gwa VI (2018) Effect of Moringa oleifera and Vernonia amygdalina leaf extracts against Aspergillus flavus and Botryodiplodia theobromae causing rot of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) seeds. Appl Sci Res Rev 5: 1-7.
  32. Okigbo RN, Nneka IA (2005) Control of yam tuber with leaf extracts of Xylopia aethiopica and Zingiber Officinale. Afr J Biotechnol 4: 804-807.
  33. Ahmed KM, Ravinder RC (1993) A pictorial guide to the identification of seedborne fungi of Sorghum, Pearl millet, Finger millet, Chickpea, Pigeonpea and Groundnut. Information Bulletin no. 34. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
  34. Barnett HL, Hunter BR (1999) Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. Fourth edition. Academic Press San Diego, California USA p: 218.
  35. Okigbo RN, Ikediugwu FEO (2000) Studies on biological control of post-harvest rot of yams (Dioseorea spp) with Trichoderma viride. J Phytopathol 148: 351-355.
  36. Taiga A (2012) Differential rate of dry rot in Dioscorea rotundata (White Yam) along the uber length due to rot causing fungi. Adv Microbio 2: 452-455.
  37. Amienyo CA, Ataga AE (2006) Post harvest fungal diseases of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.Lam) tubers sold in selected markets in Rivers state, Nigeria. Science Africa 5: 95-98.
  38. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd Edition), John Wiley and Sons p: 680.
  39. Ezeibekwe IO, Ibe AE (2010) Fungal organisms associated with yam (Dioscorea rotundata, poir) rot at Owerri, Imo State of Niger. J Molecular Genetics 2: 1-5.
  40. Amadioha AC (1996) Control of storage rot of potato caused by Rhizopus oryzae. Int J Pest Management 52: 311-324.
  41. Cochran GW, Cox GM (1992) Experimental designs. 2nd Edn, John willey and Sons Inc p: 611.
  42. Ogaraku AO, Usman HO (2008) Storage rot of some yams (Dioscorea Spp) in Keffi and Environs, Nasarawa State, Nige PAT  4: 22-27.
  43. Amusa NA (1997) Fungi associated with anthracnose symptoms of yam (Dioscorea spp.) in South-West Nigeria and their Roles in Crop Res 13: 177-183.
  44. Awuah RT, Akrasi KO (2007) Suppression of tuber rots of yam caused by Aspergillus niger with a yam Rhizobacterium. Afr Crop Sci Conference Proceedings 8: 875-879.
  45. Arinze AE (1998) The occurrence of antifungal activity in yam tissue in response to microbial deterioration. Nige J Plant Protect 12: 9-14.
  46. Emehute JKU, Ikotun T, Nwauzor EC, Nwokocha HN (1998) Crop protection. Food yams: Advances in Research. IITA/NRCRI pp: 141-186.
  47. Amadioha AC (2003) Evaluation of some plants leaf extracts against Colletotrichum lindemuthianum in Cowpea. Acta Phytopatho Entomologica Hungarica 38: 259-265.
  48. Hycenth N (2008) Effect of different plant extracts in the control of yam (Dioscorea sp) in Yola, Adamawa State, Nigeria. Nige Agri J 3: 382-387.
  49. Bonire JJ (1985) Preventing yam rot with organotin compounds. Nige J Sci 19: 145-148.
Citation: Gwa VI, Richard IB (2018) Susceptibility of White Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) Tuber to Rot Fungi and Control with Extracts of Zingiber officinale Rosc. Azadirachta indica A. Juss. and Piper guineense Schumach. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 9: 452.

Copyright: © 2018 Gwa VI, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.