Short Communication - (2015) Volume 4, Issue 4

Molecular Targets for Improvement of Parkinson's Disease Therapy

Tiziana Cocco1 and Sergio Papa1,2*
1Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University ‘A. Moro’, Bari, Italy, E-mail:
2Institute of Biomembranes and Bioenergetics, Italian National Research Council (CNR), Via G. Amendola 165/A, Bari, Italy, E-mail:
*Corresponding Author: Sergio Papa, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University ‘A. Moro’, Bari, Italy Email:


This paper is a concise overview of molecular targets whose attack can contribute to improve the therapy of Parkinson’s disease. Particular attention is given to the merits of gene therapy and to the information that can be acquired, studying the hereditary forms of PD, on the pathogenetic mechanisms of Parkinsonism and putative targets for new therapeutical measures.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; Neurodegenerative disease; Nervous system


Parkinson’s disease (PD), the most frequent ageing-progressive neurodegenerative movement disorder, 1-2% prevalence above 65 years, is caused by loss, above a threshold level, of dopamine producing neurons in substantia nigra pars compacta and involves dysfunction in dopamine excitable midbrain neurons as well as in other central and peripheral nervous system regions [1]. PD results from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors and the pathogenetic processes are not yet completely unveiled [2]. Two hundred years after its first description PD is still incurable. PD by itself can, in fact, represent an intrinsic ageing factor in the affected patients. Administration of levodopa (L-DOPA), which reaches substantia nigra neurons where it is decarboxylated to dopamine and is then released at the synapses of dopamine excitable neurons, is the effective drug for treatment of PD motor impairment symptoms. After a variable number of years treatment, the therapeutical efficacy of L-DOPA decreases, however, and adverse effects increase [3]. This demands for new therapeutical strategies.

Improving L-DOPA Therapeutical Treatment

Over time motor fluctuations and motor complicating dyskinesias develop in the later stages of L-DOPA PD therapy. These are primarily due to “wearing off “ and “on-off” movement disorders which reflect the increasing short duration of action of the single doses of L-DOPA administration [4], worsened by intervening excessive glutamatergic basal ganglia neuronal excitability [5,6]. As a first measure to overcome these intervening drawbacks of L-DOPA treatment, different L-DOPA formulations have been developed to provide more continuous, neuronal supplementation of L-DOPA. These include use of soluble pro-drug compounds like L-DOPA methylester, gastro retentive L-DOPA formulations, microspheres of different sizes delivering L-DOPA at different rates (for example the PX-066, (Rytary) whose use has been approved in USA) [4]. Combined administration of L-DOPA with monoamine oxidase inhibitors or selective catechol-omethyl transferase (COMT) inhibitor, are valuable adjuncts prolonging the duration of L-DOPA action [7]. Combined administration of L-DOPA with dopamine, eventually incorporated in biodegradable nanoparticles to ferry DA across the blood-brain barrier appears to improve the efficacy of L-DOPA therapy [8]. Antagonists of the NMDA glutamate receptor in basal ganglia, like amantadine or modulators of the metabotropic glutamate receptors are under trials [9].

Viral Vector-based Gene Therapy Approaches

Over the past decade, gene therapy (GT) approaches have been undertaken to treat PD. GT based on therapeutical application of DNA recombinant strategy consists of direct micro-surgical injection into the putamen of PD patients of viral-vector recombined genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes in L-DOPA biosynthesis like, aromatic L-aminoacid decarboxylase (AADC) [10-12], plus tyrosine hydroxylase and cyclohydrolase1 [13]. The remarkable advantage of this GT approach is provided by the continuous and stable expression of the enzyme proteins in the site of the injection with continuous dopamine production restricted to the dopamine depleted-striatum. This allows significant reduction of the dose of L-DOPA administration, thus avoiding drawbacks of excessive generalized dopamine production. A recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 2 vector, encoding human AADC (AAV-hAADC) [10-12] or a tricistronic lentiviral vector (ProSavin), that is based on the equine infectious anemia virus encoding the rate-limiting dopamine biosyntheic enzymes tyrosine-hydroxylase, AADC and cyclohydrolase I [13,14] have been used.

Phase 1 clinical trials on groups of six [11] and fifteen patients [13] confirmed controlled and persistent targeted expression of the engineered enzyme and dopamine production. A 12 months follow-up of the patients treated with ProSavin verified that the patients, besides mild and moderate adverse effects, did not present serious adverse events related to the study drug and surgical procedure [13]. These early phase clinical trials provide preliminary evidence for safety and potential clinical benefit of GT therapy for long-term treatment of PD patients and motivate longer-term clinical trials to confirm efficacy, tolerability, patient’s acceptance and regulatory approval [15].

Delivery to the subthalamic nucleus of viral vector-mediated glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) has, also, been applied to enhance production of gamma aminobutyric acid to counteract glutamatergic excitability of basal ganglion motor system [16].

In the same years in which gene therapy was implemented, application of cell therapy (CT) to PD treatment has also been pursued. Review of CT is beyond the scope of the present paper. Data on this can be found in GT reviews [17,18].

It can be noted, at any event, that GT involves the use of well characterized viral-mediated constructs of genes coding known enzymes acting on the biosynthetic pathway of dopamine or GABA. Furthermore procedures to evaluate, at molecular level, the successful targeted production of the neurotransmitters are available. CT, which is based on transplantation in the PD striatum of pluripotent embryonic, bone marrow-derived or mesenchimal stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells from adult cells of the same patient, clearly involves interaction of the transplanted cells with the local environment at the site of their introduction and complex interplay with differentiation and grow factors. Furthermore there is the risk that the transplanted stem cells, besides differentiation in dopaminergic cells, could result in tumour formation [17].

How Familial Cases of PD Help to Identify Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Possible Molecular Targets for Therapy

Important clues for identification of additional molecular targets for improvement of PD therapeutical treatment come from the study of hereditary forms of PD. Whilst 90% of PD cases are sporadic, rare mendelian hereditary forms, resulting from a variety of autosomal mutations in more than 10 PARK genes, represent all together 10% of PD cases [19,20]. Mutations in mitochondrial DNA have also been found to contribute to PD development and clinical course [21]. Elucidation of the pathogenetic mechanism(s) of PD familial cases, contributes to identify susceptible sites and networks whose acquired alterations might be involved in sporadic PD [2]. Mutations in PARK2 gene, coding for parkin, are the most common cause of autosomal recessive PD and more than 100 different PARK2 pathogenetic mutations have, so far, been identified [20]. Parkin belongs to the ring between ring fingers (RBR) protein family of E3 ubiquitin ligases [22]. It is generally accepted that loss of the ligase activity, or even loss of the entire parkin protein, in patients with PARK2 mutations impair protein degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system with accumulation of toxic products and aggregates leading to degeneration and death of dopaminergic neurons [23-25]. Parkin appears to exert its effects in different cellular compartments including in particular mitochondria [26]. Parkin can translocate into mitochondria upon phosphorylation by the PINK1, protein kinase encoded by the PARK6 gene [27] and exert there a critical role in degradation of altered proteins and induction of elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria by a process defined as ‘mitophagy’ [28]. PARK2 mutations which abrogate this parkin clearing function results in a progressive general mitochondrial dysfunction [24]. Investigations on transfected cell cultures has, however, provided evidence that parkin can also up- or down-regulate the expression of different genes [29]. Extensive investigation in the authors’ laboratory in primary cultures of fibroblasts from patient’s skin biopsies have shown that different mutations of PARK2, in independent patients affected by autosomal recessive PD, resulted in depression of mitochondrial respiratory chain enzymes, in particular complex I, inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory activity and ATP production [30]. These effects were associated with defect in the PGC1□ mastered transcription cascade of mitochondrial respiratory proteins [30]. Pathogenetic mutations in PARK6, coding for PINK1 serine/threonine kinase, represent the second most common cause of autosomal recessive PD. Also in the fibroblasts of a PARK6 PD patient a marked depression of respiratory chain complex I, mitochondrial respiration and ATP production was observed [31,32]. In both PARK2 and PARK6 patient’s fibroblasts a marked increase in the level of oxygen free radicals was detected thus setting up a damaging vicious cycle. It was, in particular, found that the inhibition of respiration was caused by loss of cytochrome c from mitochondria [32,33]. There is, in fact, convincing evidence and consensus that defects in mitochondrial respiratory ATP production associated to increased oxygen free radical production is a major cause of functional impairment of dopaminergic neurons [34,35]. Proteomic analysis of PARK2 patient’s fibroblasts from our laboratory (Rosa Lippolis; Rosa A Siciliano; Consiglia Pacelli; Anna Ferretta; Maria F Mazzeo; Salvatore Scacco; Francesco Papa; Antonio Gaballo; Claudia Dell’Aquila; Michele De Mari; Sergio Papa; Tiziana Cocco (in press) BBA-Molecular Basis of Disease) shows a general decrease in cellular Ca2+-binding proteins including the S100A-4, S100A-6 and S100-A10 members of the S100A family of proteins which are involved in modulation of intracellular Ca2+ level [36], calreticulin and annexin A5. It has, in fact, been reported that parkin deficiency in cellular model leads to calcium level increase that makes cells more vulnerable to neurotoxins [37].

More Molecular Targets for PD Therapy

Hurley et al. [38] have found increased expression of Cav1,3 voltage-gated calcium channel in post-mortem brain of early stage Parkinson disease together with reduced level of Ca2+ binding proteins. Both of these changes are expected to contribute to enhance cellular Ca2+ concentration and consequent Ca2+ excitotoxicity [39]. Increased cytosolic concentration of Ca2+>10-5 M results in a large accumulation of Ca2+ in mitochondria [40], where it induces a sequential series of deleterious events including: opening of the cyclosporine-sensitive permeability transition pore and loss of cytochrome c and other proapoptotic factors from mitochondria [41]. The decrease in the level of Ca2+-binding/buffering proteins and increased expression of Cav1,3 voltage-gated calcium channel [38] lend support to the concept that Ca2+ excitotoxicity plays a central role in Parkinson disease [38,42]. An historical cohort study in Denmark [43] has indicated that the exposure of patients to dihydropyridine Ca2+-channels blockers, largely used in therapeutical treatment of hypertension, is associated with a reduced risk of incident PD and reduced mortality among PD patients. These observations warrant further basic and clinical studies aimed to develop and test blockers of Ca2+ channels in prevention and treatment of Parkinson disease. A main target of Ca2+ excitotoxicity is represented by mitochondria. Large accumulation of Ca2+ in these organelles results in a deleterious cascade of events, which ultimately cause impairment of respiration and ATP production and enhancement of ROS production [30,44]. Impaired mitochondrial energy metabolism, oxidative stress conditions and age-related progressive accumulation of oxidatively damaged and misfolded proteins, which in turn aggregate and impair cellular house keeping and specialized functions, all together contribute to PD pathogenesis [45,46]. All this supports an adjuvant therapeutical action of natural antioxidant phenols (see the case of resveratrol [44] and hydroxytyrosol [47]) which can promote the expression and/or the activity of gene products involved in cell energy metabolism and protection against oxidative stress and productions/accumulation of oxidized/misfolded proteins [48,49]. In this respect the neuropeptide CART (cocaine-amphetamine-regulated transcript)which is mainly expressed in the brain, particularly in dopaminergic midbrain regions, and has antioxidant activities, qualifies as another therapeutic candidate for PD [50,51]. The list of molecular candidates for PD therapy has in fact grown in the last few years. Results in animal models of PD indicates that retinoic acid reduces degeneration and loss of dopaminergic neurons induced in rat by exposure to 6-hydroxydopamine, a toxic catabolite of dopamine [52,53]. Injection in the striatum of rats, with MPTPinduced parkinsonism, of retinoic acid encapsulated in polymeric nanoparticles has been shown to be particularly effective in reducing death of dopaminergic neurons [54]. Lactoferrin nanoparticles, with encapsulated human glial cell neurothophic factor gene (hGDNF), injected intraperitoneally, was also found to improve locomotor activity and reduce dopaminergic neuron loss in rotenone-induced PD rats [55]. Accumulation of α-synuclein Lewy Bodies in dopaminergic neurons appears as one of the factors involved in neuronal degeneration and clinical evolution of at least certain cases of PD [56]. Based on this and related observations vaccines constituted by α-synuclein peptides [56] have been developed by the research EU consortium SYMPATH. Experimental controls have verified the efficacy of □-synuclein vaccines [56], and they are now undergoing, with much hope, to phase 1 clinical trials.

Finally a compound which appears to be another L-DOPA adjuvant in PD therapy is safinamide [57]. Safinamide inhibits monoamine oxidase, MAO-B and prevents excessive release of glutamate by blocking Na+ Channels [58]. In phase 3 clinical trials safinamide was found to prolong the time of L-DOPA positive effect on movement impairment without increasing complicating dyskinesias [57].


Good perspectives are today emerging for improvement of L-DOPA therapeutical treatment of PD. Phase 1 clinical trials have shown that gene therapy, based on delivery to selected brain areas of viral vector-mediated genes coding for enzyme involved in dopamine and gamma-aminobutyric synthesis, provide safe, controlled and persistent generation of the biologically active proteins in the targeted structures of human brain. More extensive and prolonged clinical trials and predictive animal models are waited to verify reliable and safe, long-term efficacy of gene therapy, as well as of cell therapy. L-DOPA therapy can be improved by the use of different formulations of the drug, that allow more continuous and controlled dopamine supply to the defective neurons. PD therapy can also be improved by combined administration of L-DOPA with dopamine and inhibitors of dopamine decarboxylation. Experimental work on animal PD models indicate a potential therapeutical action of retinoic acid. α-synuclein vaccines have been produced. Their effect in removing toxic Lewy bodies from dopaminergic neurons is being checked. It is hoped that clinical trials will verify the therapeutical efficacy of these vaccines. What we are learning on the pathogenesis of autosomal familial cases of PD are, on the other hand, disclosing molecular targets for compounds like Ca2+-channel blockers and natural and synthetic antioxidants, which, in addition to the other known L-DOPA adjutants, can contribute to improve PD therapy, prolonging L-DOPA positive effect on movement impairment and reducing dyskinesias. All these new therapeutical approaches may result in a better psycho-physical condition of the PD patients and prolong their life expectancy.


This work was supported by Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany to T.C. and by FIRB-MERIT 2008 No. RBNE08HWLZ012 to S.P.


  1. Braak H, Ghebremedhin E, Rüb U, Bratzke H, Del Tredici K (2004) Stages in the development of Parkinson's disease-related pathology.Cell Tissue Res 318: 121-134.
  2. Obeso JA, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Goetz CG, Marin C, Kordower JH, et al. (2010) Missing pieces in the Parkinson's disease puzzle.Nat Med 16: 653-661.
  3. Fabbrini G, Brotchie JM, Grandas F, Nomoto M, Goetz CG (2007) Levodopa-induced dyskinesias.MovDisord 22: 1379-1389.
  4. Jenner P (2015) Treatment of the later stages of Parkinson's disease - pharmacological approaches now and in the future.TranslNeurodegener 4: 3.
  5. Gasparini F, Di Paolo T, Gomez-Mancilla B (2013) Metabotropic glutamate receptors for Parkinson's disease therapy.Parkinsons Dis 2013: 196028.
  6. Calon F, Rajput AH, Hornykiewicz O, Bédard PJ, Di Paolo T (2003) Levodopa-induced motor complications are associated with alterations of glutamate receptors in Parkinson's disease.Neurobiol Dis 14: 404-416.
  7. Gershanik OS (2015) Improving L-dopa therapy: the development of enzyme inhibitors.MovDisord 30: 103-113.
  8. Pahuja R, Seth K, Shukla A Shukla RK, Bhatnagar P, et al. (2015) Trans-blood brain barrier delivery of dopamine-loaded nanoparticles reverses functional deficits in parkinsonian rats.ACS Nano 9: 4850-4871.
  9. Rascol O, Fox S, Gasparini F, Kenney C, Di Paolo T, et al. (2014) Use of metabotropic glutamate 5-receptor antagonists for treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias.Parkinsonism RelatDisord 20: 947-956.
  10. Eberling JL, Jagust WJ, Christine CW, Starr P, Larson P, et al. (2008) Results from a phase I safety trial of hAADC gene therapy for Parkinson disease.Neurology 70: 1980-1983.
  11. Muramatsu S, Fujimoto K, Kato S, Mizukami H, Asari S, et al. (2010) A phase I study of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene therapy for Parkinson's disease.MolTher 18: 1731-1735.
  12. Christine CW, Starr PA, Larson PS, Eberling JL, Jagust WJ, et al. (2009) Safety and tolerability of putaminal AADC gene therapy for Parkinson disease.Neurology 73: 1662-1669.
  13. Palfi S, Gurruchaga JM, Ralph GS, Lepetit H, Lavisse S, et al. (2014) Long-term safety and tolerability of ProSavin, a lentiviral vector-based gene therapy for Parkinson's disease: a dose escalation, open-label, phase 1/2 trial.Lancet 383: 1138-1146.
  14. Azzouz M, Martin-Rendon E, Barber RD, Mitrophanous KA, Carter EE, et al. (2002) Multicistroniclentiviral vector-mediated striatal gene transfer of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, tyrosine hydroxylase, and GTP cyclohydrolase I induces sustained transgene expression, dopamine production, and functional improvement in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J NeurosciOff J SocNeurosci 22: 10302–10312.
  15. Bartus RT, Weinberg MS, Samulski RJ (2014) Parkinson's disease gene therapy: success by design meets failure by efficacy.MolTher 22: 487-497.
  16. Emborg ME, Carbon M, Holden JE, During MJ, Ma Y, et al. (2007) Subthalamic glutamic acid decarboxylase gene therapy: changes in motor function and cortical metabolism.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 27: 501-509.
  17. Politis M, Lindvall O (2012) Clinical application of stem cell therapy in Parkinson's disease.BMC Med 10: 1.
  18. Dunnett SB, Björklund A, Lindvall O (2001) Cell therapy in Parkinson's disease - stop or go?Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 365-369.
  19. Corti O, Lesage S, Brice A (2011) What genetics tells us about the causes and mechanisms of Parkinson's disease.Physiol Rev 91: 1161-1218.
  20. Martin I, Dawson VL, Dawson TM (2011) Recent advances in the genetics of Parkinson's disease.Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 12: 301-325.
  21. Piccoli C, Ripoli M, Quarato G, Scrima R, D'Aprile A, et al. (2008) Coexistence of mutations in PINK1 and mitochondrial DNA in early onset parkinsonism.J Med Genet 45: 596-602.
  22. Shimura H, Hattori N, Kubo Si, Mizuno Y, Asakawa S, et al. (2000) Familial Parkinson disease gene product, parkin, is a ubiquitin-protein ligase.Nat Genet 25: 302-305.
  23. Dawson TM (2006) Parkin and defective ubiquitination in Parkinson's disease.J Neural TransmSuppl 209-213.
  24. Winklhofer KF (2014) Parkin and mitochondrial quality control: toward assembling the puzzle.Trends Cell Biol 24: 332-341.
  25. Scarffe LA, Stevens DA, Dawson VL, Dawson TM (2014) Parkin and PINK1: much more than mitophagy.Trends Neurosci 37: 315-324.
  26. Short B (2015) Damaged mitochondria get a Parkin ticket.J Cell Biol 208: 865.
  27. Kawajiri S, Saiki S, Sato S, Hattori N (2011) Genetic mutations and functions of PINK1.Trends PharmacolSci 32: 573-580.
  28. Eiyama A, Okamoto K2 (2015) PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy in mammalian cells.CurrOpin Cell Biol 33: 95-101.
  29. Unschuld PG, Dächsel J, Darios F, Kohlmann A, Casademunt E, et al. (2006) Parkin modulates gene expression in control and ceramide-treated PC12 cells.MolBiol Rep 33: 13-32.
  30. Pacelli C, De Rasmo D, Signorile A, Grattagliano I, di Tullio G, et al. (2011) Mitochondrial defect and PGC-1α dysfunction in parkin-associated familial Parkinson's disease.BiochimBiophysActa 1812: 1041-1053.
  31. Papa S, Sardanelli AM, Capitanio N, Piccoli C (2009) Mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction and mutations in mitochondrial DNA in PINK1 familial parkinsonism.J BioenergBiomembr 41: 509-516.
  32. Piccoli C, Sardanelli A, Scrima R, Ripoli M, Quarato G, et al. (2008) Mitochondrial respiratory dysfunction in familiar parkinsonism associated with PINK1 mutation.Neurochem Res 33: 2565-2574.
  33. Wang HL, Chou AH, Yeh TH, Li AH, Chen YL, et al. (2007) PINK1 mutants associated with recessive Parkinson's disease are defective in inhibiting mitochondrial release of cytochrome c.Neurobiol Dis 28: 216-226.
  34. Papa S, De Rasmo D (2013) Complex I deficiencies in neurological disorders.Trends Mol Med 19: 61-69.
  35. Haelterman NA, Yoon WH, Sandoval H, Jaiswal M, Shulman JM, et al. (2014) Amitocentric view of Parkinson's disease.Annu Rev Neurosci 37: 137-159.
  36. Donato R (1999) Functional roles of S100 proteins, calcium-binding proteins of the EF-hand type.BiochimBiophysActa 1450: 191-231.
  37. Sandebring A, Dehvari N, Perez-Manso M, Thomas KJ, Karpilovski E, et al. (2009) Parkin deficiency disrupts calcium homeostasis by modulating phospholipase C signalling.FEBS J 276: 5041-5052.
  38. Hurley MJ, Brandon B, Gentleman SM, Dexter DT (2013) Parkinson's disease is associated with altered expression of CaV1 channels and calcium-binding proteins.Brain 136: 2077-2097.
  39. Schapira AHV (2013) Calcium dysregulation in Parkinson’s disease. Brain J Neurol 136: 2015–2016.
  40. Nicholls DG, Crompton M (1980) Mitochondrial calcium transport.FEBS Lett 111: 261-268.
  41. Rasola A, Bernardi P (2011) Mitochondrial permeability transition in Ca(2+)-dependent apoptosis and necrosis.Cell Calcium 50: 222-233.
  42. Surmeier DJ, Guzman JN, Sanchez-Padilla J, Schumacker PT (2011) The role of calcium and mitochondrial oxidant stress in the loss of substantianigra pars compacta dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease.Neuroscience 198: 221-231.
  43. Pasternak B, Svanström H, Nielsen NM, Fugger L, Melbye M, et al. (2012) Use of calcium channel blockers and Parkinson's disease.Am J Epidemiol 175: 627-635.
  44. Ferretta A, Gaballo A, Tanzarella P, Piccoli C, Capitanio N, et al. (2014) Effect of resveratrol on mitochondrial function: implications in parkin-associated familiar Parkinson's disease.BiochimBiophysActa 1842: 902-915.
  45. Dawson TM, Dawson VL (2003) Molecular pathways of neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Science 302: 819–822.
  46. Grimm S, Hoehn A, Davies KJ, Grune T (2011) Protein oxidative modifications in the ageing brain: consequence for the onset of neurodegenerative disease. Free Radic Res 45: 73–88.
  47. Signorile A, Micelli L, De Rasmo D, Santeramo A, Papa F, et al. (2014) Regulation of the biogenesis of OXPHOS complexes in cell transition from replicating to quiescent state: involvement of PKA and effect of hydroxytyrosol.BiochimBiophysActa 1843: 675-684.
  48. Currò M, Trovato-Salinaro A, Gugliandolo A, Koverech G, Lodato F, et al. (2015) Resveratrol protects against homocysteine-induced cell damage via cell stress response in neuroblastoma cells.J Neurosci Res 93: 149-156.
  49. Calabrese V, Cornelius C, Dinkova-Kostova AT, Calabrese EJ, Mattson MP (2010) Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders.Antioxid Redox Signal 13: 1763-1811.
  50. Mao P, Meshul CK, Thuillier P, Goldberg NR, Reddy PH (2012) CART peptide is a potential endogenous antioxidant and preferentially localized in mitochondria.PLoS One 7: e29343.
  51. Mao P, Meshul CK, Thuillier P, Reddy PH (2013) Neurotransmitter CART as a New Therapeutic Candidate for Parkinson's Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 6: 108-123.
  52. Yin LH, Shen H, Diaz-Ruiz O, Bäckman CM, Bae E, et al. (2012) Early post-treatment with 9-cis retinoic acid reduces neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons in a rat model of Parkinson's disease.BMC Neurosci 13: 120.
  53. Ulusoy GK, Celik T, Kayir H, Gürsoy M, Isik AT, et al. (2011) Effects of pioglitazone and retinoic acid in a rotenone model of Parkinson's disease.Brain Res Bull 85: 380-384.
  54. Esteves M, Cristóvão AC, Saraiva T, Rocha SM, Baltazar G, et al. (2015) Retinoic acid-loaded polymeric nanoparticles induce neuroprotection in a mouse model for Parkinson's disease.Front Aging Neurosci 7: 20.
  55. Huang R, Ke W, Liu Y, Wu D, Feng L, et al. (2010) Gene therapy using lactoferrin-modified nanoparticles in a rotenone-induced chronic Parkinson model.J NeurolSci 290: 123-130.
  56. Schneeberger A, Mandler M, Mattner F, Schmidt W (2012) Vaccination for Parkinson's disease.Parkinsonism RelatDisord 18 Suppl 1: S11-13.
  57. Kandadai RM, Jabeen SA, Kanikannan MA, Borgohain R (2014) Safinamide for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.Expert Rev ClinPharmacol 7: 747-759.
  58. Caccia C, Maj R, Calabresi M, Maestroni S, Faravelli L, et al. (2006) Safinamide: from molecular targets to a new anti-Parkinson drug.Neurology 67: S18-23.
Citation: Cocco T, Papa S (2015) Molecular Targets for Improvement of Parkinson’s Disease Therapy. Brain Disord Ther 4:173.

Copyright: © 2015 Cocco T, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.