Journal of Biomolecular Research & Therapeutics

Interfacial Biomolecular Nano Engineering and Biomolecular Sensing

Lihua Chang^* Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
^*Correspondence: Lihua Chang, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, Email:

Received: 28-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. BOM-23-22749; Editor assigned: 31-Jul-2023, Pre QC No. BOM-23-22749(PQ); Reviewed: 15-Aug-2023, QC No. BOM-23-22749; Revised: 23-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. BOM-23-22749(R); Published: 31-Aug-2023, DOI: 10.35248/2167-7956.23.12.311

Description

A multidisciplinary field, interfacial biomolecular engineering uses concepts and methods from physics, chemical engineering, biology and other sciences [1]. More frequently supports many chemical engineering disciplines such as controlled medication release, food science, protein engineering, bioseparation, biosensors and biomaterial processing. At solid-fluid and fluidfluid interfaces as well as in emulsions, the macroscopic behavior of biomolecular interfaces particularly that of proteins has been historically studied [2]. However in many instances, macroscopic descriptions fall short in connecting biomolecular structure with interfacial architecture and the physicochemical process environment, failing to properly influence the design of new goods, procedures and applications [3]. Food emulsification is a famous example however, our knowledge of interfacial architecture is still limited, and the relationship between the energy used for processing and the architectural characteristics is still poorly understood. When a distinguishing interfacial feature has dimensions smaller than 100 nm the interface is said to be nanostructured. Biomolecules at these interfaces provide novel functionalities with distinct characteristics [4]. In actuality the nanoscale dimension of biomolecules themselves can be organized at an interface resulting in nanostructured products.

To build a highly effective sensing interface we provide three primary interfacial engineering and regulation approaches. As a starting point it describes electrochemical sensing on a nanostructured sensing interface [5]. Because of its nanostructured topographical features this kind of sensing interface can detect nucleic acids and proteins with extreme sensitivity. It also discusses molecule-mediated interfacial regulation which is particularly useful for small molecule-assisted interfacial engineering. The functional alteration of the sensing interface is the third strategy it examine with a particular emphasis on self-assembled DNA nanostructure-functionalized (particularly framework nucleic acids-functionalized) biosensing interface [6]. By providing sensors with high surface-to-volume ratios and quick interfacial mass transfer rates optimizing the surface morphology of nanostructured sensing substrates provides a direct method of engineering the sensing interface. Typically noble metals like palladium and gold are electrodeposited on a conductive substrate to create this kind of sensing interface [7]. By adjusting the electrode position duration, reagent concentration, electrodepositing voltage and supporting electrolytes like HCL it is possible to alter the size and topology of the nanostructure on the interface. Sensing interfaces with various sizes and detection sensitivities can be produced by simply adjusting the deposition time [8]. Nonspecific absorption of the probes or other matrix onto the sensing interface is one of the key issues that seriously impact the sensing performance of the electrochemical sensor. Small molecules such as Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) can occupy and block the interspace between probes and further favors the perpendicular orientation of the probe which can finally improve the recognition efficiency of the probe [9]. The most current developments in interface engineering for creating highly effective electrochemical biosensing interfaces over the last two years have been compiled by us. By altering the mass transfer rate and diffusion profile on the interface the topological structure of the sensing interface is a factor that can increase accessibility. Small compounds can also prevent nonspecific probe and matrix adsorption on the interface [10]. Recent advancements at the nexus of Nano- and bio-science, including the creation of extremely novel protein-based Nano pores and the application of well-established analytical tools.

References

1. Elixhauser A. Costs of breast cancer and the cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7(4):604-615.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

2. Howell A. Clinical evidence for the involvement of oestrogen in the development and progression of breast cancer. Proc Royal Soc B sci. 1989;95(1):49-57.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

3. Duan XN, Bai WP. China consensus on the safety management of endometrial endometrium in patients with breast cancer treated with selective estrogen receptor modulators. J Biomed Res. 2021;42(4): 672-677.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

4. Cao J, Huang M, Yan J, XU J, Yang Z, Huang K, et al. Effect of acupuncture on ER and PR expressions in rats with DMBA-induced mammary cancer. J Tradit Chin Med. 2016;35(3):344-348.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

5. Qi Y. Experimental study on NDVI inversion using GPS-R remote sensing based on BP neural network. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology. 2018.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Ma B, Yan G, Chai B, Hou X. XGBLC: An improved survival prediction model based on XGBoost. Bioinformatics. 2021.

   [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. Dias MO, Cunha MP, Jesus CD, Rocha GJ, Pradella JG, Rossell CE, et.al Second generation ethanol in Brazil: can it compete with electricity production? Bioresour. Technol. 2011; 102(19):8964-71

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

8. Dias MO, Junqueira TL, Cavalett O, Cunha MP, Jesus CD, Rossell CE, et.al. Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash. Bioresour. Technol. 2012; 103(1):152-161.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

9. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010; 101(13):4851-4861

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Duval A, Lawoko M. A review on lignin-based polymeric, micro-and nano-structured materials. React. Funct. Polym. 2014; 85:78-96

    [Google Scholar]