Research Article - (2016) Volume 7, Issue 4

Cell Intrinsic Factors Modulate the Effects of IFNγ on the Development of Chlamydia trachomatis

Shardulendra Sherchand1, Joyce A. Ibana2, Alison J. Quayle1 and Ashok Aiyar1*
1Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
2Institute of Biology, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines, USA
*Corresponding Author: Ashok Aiyar, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, LSU Health Sciences Center, 1901 Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA, Tel: (504) 568-4072, Fax: (504) 568-2918 Email:

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen that cannot synthesize several amino acids, including tryptophan. Rather, C. trachomatis acquires these essential metabolites from its human host cell. Chlamydial dependence on host-provided tryptophan underlies a major host defense mechanism against the bacterium; namely, the induction of the host tryptophan-catabolizing enzyme, indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase (IDO1) by interferon gamma (IFNγ), which leads to eradication of C. trachomatis by tryptophan starvation. For this reason, IFNγ is proposed to be the major host protective cytokine against genital C. trachomatis infections. The protective effect of IFNγ against C. trachomatis can be recapitulated in vitro using epithelial cell-lines such as the cervical carcinoma derived cell-line Hela, the Hela subclone HEp-2, and the cervical carcinoma derived cell-line ME180. Addition of IFNγ to these cells infected with C. trachomatis results in a strong bactericidal or bacteriostatic effect dependent on the concentration of IFNγ administered. Unlike Hela, HEp-2, and ME180, there are other human epithelial, or epithelial-like cell-lines where administration of IFNγ does not affect chlamydial replication, although they express the IFNγ receptor (IFNGR). In this report, we have characterized the mechanisms that underlie this dichotomy using the cell-lines C33A and 293. Akin to Hela, C33A is derived from a human cervical carcinoma, while 293 cells were produced by transfection of adenovirus type 5 DNA into embryonic kidney cells. We demonstrate that although IFNGR is expressed at high levels in C33A cells, its ligation by IFNγ does not result in STAT1 phosphorylation, an essential step for activation of the IDO1 promoter. Our results indicate that although the IFNγ- dependent signaling cascade is intact in 293 cells; the IDO1 promoter is not activated in these cells because it is epigenetically silenced, most likely by DNA methylation. Because polymorphisms in IFNγ, IFNGR, and the IDO1 promoter are known to affect other human infections or diseased states, our results indicate that the effect of allelic differences in these genes and the pathways they activate should be evaluated for their effect on C. trachomatis pathology.

Introduction

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterium [1] associated with ocular and genital infections of columnar epithelial cells in humans. There are 15 serovars of C. trachomatis [2], which serovars A-C are associated with ocular infections, and as such are a major cause of preventable blindness [3,4]. Genital serovars [D-K] are the most prevalent bacterial (STI) in USA and worldwide [5]. Clearance of infection, without treatment, might take several months to years [6,7]. These undetected and untreated infections can result chronic inflammatory responses, whose consequences include pelvic inflammatory disease, salpingitis, ectopic pregnancy, cervicitis, urethritis, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain [8].

C. trachomatis has a biphasic developmental cycle [9], with the two major bacterial states being elementary bodies (EB) and reticulate bodies (RB) [9]. EBs are infectious particles but metabolically inactive. Upon infection, EBs are incorporated into a host-derived lipid vesicle called an inclusion, in which they differentiate into RBs, which are metabolically active but not infectious [9-11]. RBs replicate by binary fission and finally re-differentiate into EBs that are released and initiate secondary infections of neighboring uninfected cells [9]. Due to its obligate intracellular life-cycle, C. trachomatis has lost the capacity to synthesize many metabolites including the amino acid tryptophan [12,13]. Because human cells also cannot synthesize tryptophan, removal of tryptophan from media blocks chlamydial development and as such is considered bactericidal. The inability of C. trachomatis and its host epithelial cell to synthesize tryptophan has rendered the bacterium highly susceptible to the host cytokine IFNγ, which induces expression of the tryptophan catabolizing enzyme indoleamine 2,3- dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) [14]. Upon binding its receptor (IFNGR), which is a heterodimer of two proteins, IFNGR1/IFNGR2, IFNγ activates the Jak1/Jak2 kinase to phosphorylate the transcription activator STAT1 [15]. Upon phosphorylation, STAT1 dimerizes [15], is translocated into the nucleus [15], and binds cognate GAS sites in the IDO1 promoter to activate transcription of this gene [15]. The IDO1 enzyme irreversibly catabolizes tryptophan to kynurenine [16], thereby starving C. trachomatis of this essential amino acid. For this reason, IFNγ is considered to be the major protective host cytokine against C. trachomatis infections [10,13,17].

Prior studies indicate that the effect of IFNγ on C. trachomatis differs between human cell lines, including Hela, A549, ME180, HEp-2, A2EN, and McCoy [10,17-24], suggesting that cell-intrinsic differences can influence the IFNγ-driven host protective response against C. trachomatis . Understanding the nature of these differences is critical to design vaccines against C. trachomatis that are minimally affected by genetic differences in humans, or to identify therapeutics that permits such vaccines to be uniformly effective. In this study we have used two cell-lines, C33A and 293, in which C. trachomatis development is not affected by administration of IFNγ to understand some of these cell-intrinsic differences.

Materials and Methods

Cell-lines and culture conditions

The cell-lines Hela [25], 293 [26], C33A [27,28] and A2EN [18] were used for this study. Hela and C33A cell-lines are derived from cervical carcinomas. 293 and A2EN cell-lines were constructed in vitro . 293 cells were made by transfection of sheared Adenovirus Type 5 DNA into human embryonic kidney cells, followed by a screen for clones that were immortalized. A2EN cells were constructed by transduction of primary human endocervical epithelial cells with a retroviral vector expressing the E6 and E7 oncogenes of human papillomavirus type 16. All cell-lines were routinely passaged in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells infected with C. trachomatis were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum.

Chlamydia trachomatis infections

Cells plated 24 hours prior to infection in antibiotic-free DMEM +10% FBS were infected with C. trachomatis serovar D (D/UW-3/CX) at m.o.i. of 5 in sucrose-phosphate-glutamic-acid (SPG) buffer. Hela, A2EN and C33A cells were infected as described previously [17]. Infection in 293 cells was done by gently rocking at 4°C for one hour. SPG was replaced with complete media and incubated for 42 hours. Cells infected with C . trachomatis were grown in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum. The complete medium contains 4 mg/L tryptophan.

Immunofluorescence staining for chlamydial inclusions

Cells were stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugated anti-chlamydial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antibody (Merifluor) and counterstained using Hoechst 33342 (1: 3000 dilution) for two minutes. Cells were visualized using a Zeiss Axiovision AX10 microscope with a 63X oil-immersion objective. Z-stacks containing 20 optical sections were deconvolved using the Landweber positively constrained deconvolution algorithm as described previously [29]. Zprojections of maximum intensity were shown. Inclusion forming units (IFU) were quantified by infecting monolayer of Hela cells as described previously [17].

Immunoblotting for IDO1, STAT1, p-STAT1, and β-actin

Immunoblots were conducted as described previously [17,30]. The following primary antibodies were used: 1) IDO1–Millipore catalog 05-840; 2) STAT1–Santa Cruz catalog sc-464; 3) p-STAT1–Santa Cruz catalog sc-7988; detects STAT1 phosphorylated at tyrosine 701; 4) β- actin–Sigma-Aldrich catalog A1978.

Flow cytometry for IFNGR1

Flow cytometry was conducted as described previously [30]. Cells were grown for 24 hours in presence of IFNγ (600 U/ml). Cells were lifted from tissue culture dishes using Accutase (MP Biomedicals catalog ICN 1000449), pelleted, and resuspended in 100 μl of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (1% BSA in Ca2+/ Mg2+-free PBS). Anti-IFNGR1 (BD Pharmingen catalog 558937) antibody (5 μl) was added and incubated on ice for 30 min. Isotype control and untreated cells were used as control.

IFNγ exposure

IFNγ was obtained from Peprotech (catalog 300-02). IFNγ was added at the indicated concentrations to control cells and infected cells, typically 600 U/ml.

IDO1 promoter transactivation assays

A plasmid, p616, was constructed in which the firefly luciferase gene is under the control of the IDO1 promoter amplified from 293 genomic DNA. The sequence of the IDO1 promoter from 293 cells was identical to promoter sequence in reference human genome (GRCh37). p616 also contains genetic elements from Epstein-Barr virus, namely the cis-acting sequence oriP , and the trans-acting protein that binds oriP , EBNA1 [31,32]. These elements permit the plasmid to be replicated and maintained stably in proliferating cells [31], thereby allowing a stable derivative of 293 cells, termed 293/p616, to be created containing this reporter plasmid. The EBV elements used do not affect activity of the IDO1 promoter. Transactivation assays were initiated by adding IFNγ to 293/p616 cells; cells extracts made 24-48 hours postaddition of IFNγ were used to assess luciferase expression by luminescence assays conducted as described previously [33].

Statistical analyses

All experiments were conducted at least three times. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to perform statistical comparisons using the MSTAT software package [34].

Results

The effect of IFNγ treatment on the development of Chlamydia trachomatis is cell-line dependent.

Immediately after infection with C. trachomatis , Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells, grown in complete RPMI media (RPMI 1640 + 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum), were exposed to vehicle alone (PBS), or 300 U/ml of IFNγ. After an additional 42 hours, cells were fixed and stained using a FITC-conjugated anti-chlamydial LPS antibody or harvested to quantify infectious units released (IFU). The results from this experiment are shown in Figure 1. While the number and size of chlamydial inclusions were dramatically reduced in Hela and A2EN cells grown in the presence of IFNγ, no such reduction was observed C33A and 293 cells (Figure 1A). Similarly, IFU recovery at 42 hours post-infection (h.p.i) was reduced significantly in Hela and A2EN cells when grown in presence of 300 U/ml of IFNγ, but not in C33A and 293 cells (Figure 1B).

bacteriology-parasitology-Wilcoxon-Rank-Sum-Test

Figure 1: The effect of IFNγ treatment on the development of Chlamydia trachomatis is cell-line dependent. Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells were infected with C. trachomatis at an m.o.i. of 5 as described in the methods. After infection, cells were grown in RPMI media in the absence or presence (300 U/ml) of IFNγ. At 42 h.p.i. cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained using a FITCconjugated antibody against chlamydial, and counter-stained with Hoechst dye. Infected cells were also harvested to measure IFU released by infection of Hela cells. A) Primary chlamydial inclusions (green) formed in Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells 42 h.p.i. Hoechst dye (blue) shows cell nuclei and chlamydial DNA. Scale bar indicates 50 µm. B) IFU/ml released after 42 h.p.i. in Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells as evaluated by infection of Hela cells. The mean and standard deviation from three independent experiments were represented as bars (** indicates p<0.01 by Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test).

IDO1 is expressed in Hela and A2EN cells treated with IFNγ

The observations made above can be explained if the expression of IDO1 differs between cell-lines after addition of IFNγ. Therefore, we evaluated the expression of IDO1 by immunoblot in these four celllines after addition of IFNγ. Cells were grown in presence or absence of IFNγ for 24 hours, after which IDO1 protein levels were evaluated. The outcome of this experiment is shown in Figure 2. IDO1 was expressed in Hela and A2EN cells but not C33A and 293 cells (Figure 2). These results explain why reduced chlamydial development observed in Hela and A2EN cells upon IFNγ exposure but not in C33A and 293 cells.

bacteriology-parasitology-IDO1-induced-Hela-A2EN-cells

Figure 2: IDO1 is induced in Hela and A2EN cells but not in C33A and 293 cells treated with IFNγ. Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells were grown in the absence or presence of IFNγ. (600 U/ml) for 24 hours, after which, cells were harvested and lysates were used to evaluate expression of IDO1 by immunoblot using an antibody against IDO1. β-actin expression was evaluated as a loading control.

IFNGR1 is expressed in A2EN, C33A, and 293 cells

Because IDO1 is not expressed in C33A and 293 cells after IFNγ treatment, we tested whether IFNGR is expressed in the surface of these cells. For this, A2EN, C33A, and 293 cells were grown under control conditions or in the presence of 600 U/ml of IFNγ for 24 hours. At this time, cells were fixed, but not permeabilized and stained using an antibody against IFNGR1. The levels of surface IFNGR1 expression was quantified by flow cytometry. It should be noted that although we only stained for IFNGR1, surface expression of IFNGR1 requires that it form a heterodimer with the IFNGR2 subunit [15]. The results obtained from this experiment are shown in Figure 3. As anticipated, surface expression of IFNGR1 was observed in IFNγ-responsive A2EN cells. We also found surface expression of IFNGR1 in C33A and 293 cells. Therefore, the failure of IFNγ to induce IDO1 expression in these cells does not result from a lack of surface IFNGR. Rather, this failure must result from downstream steps in the signaling pathway that leads to IDO1 expression after administration of IFNγ.

bacteriology-parasitology-Surface-IFNGR1-expression-observed-Hela

Figure 3: Surface IFNGR1 expression is observed in Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells. Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells were grown in the absence or presence of IFNγ (600 U/ml) After 24 hours, cells were lifted, counted, fixed but not permeabilized, and stained with antibody against IFNGR1. Surface expression of IFNGR1 was evaluated by flow cytometry (profile in green). Flow cytometry profiles obtained with the isotype control antibody are shown in grey.

STAT1 is phosphorylated in 293 but not in C33A cells after addition of IFNγ

Activation of STAT1 by phosphorylation after administration of IFNγ is essential for transactivation of the IDO1 promoter [15]. Therefore, we evaluated the capacity of IFNγ to induce STAT1 phosphorylation in all four cell-lines, anticipating that IFNγ addition will induce STAT1 phosphorylation in Hela and A2EN cells. Cells were grown in the presence or absence of IFNγ (600 U/ml) for 24 hours, after which STAT1 and phospho-STAT1 (pSTAT1) expression was evaluated by immunoblot as described in the Material and Methods section. The outcome of this experiment is shown in Figure 4. IFNγ treatment increased the expression of STAT1 in Hela, A2EN, and 293 cells but not in C33A cells. As expected, STAT1 was phosphorylated in Hela and A2EN when cells exposed to IFNγ. STAT1 was not phosphorylated in C33A cells exposed IFNγ, providing an explanation for the inability of IFNγ to induce IDO1 expression in C33A cells. Although IFNγ does not induce IDO1 expression in 293 cells, we were surprised to find that IFNγ induced efficient STAT1 phosphorylation in these cells, indicating that although the IFNγ induced signaling cascade is intact in 293 cells, activated STAT1 cannot or does not induce IDO1 expression.

bacteriology-parasitology-immunoblot-using-antibodies-against-STAT1

Figure 4: IFNγ does not induce STAT1 phosphorylation in C33A cells. Hela, A2EN, C33A and 293 cells were plated in regular media, which was replaced with or without 600 U/ml of IFNγ 24 hours post-plating. After 24 hours of IFNγ treatment, cells were harvested and used to make extracts that were evaluated by immunoblot using antibodies against STAT1 and pSTAT1.

The WT IDO1 promoter is functional in 293 cells

We considered it possible that that IFNγ administration does not induce IDO1 expression in 293 cells as a consequence of mutations in the IDO1 promoter within 293 cells. To evaluate this, the IDO1 promoter was cloned and sequenced from 293 cells; this analysis revealed it to perfectly match the IDO1 promoter present in the reference human genome (GRCh37). Because the promoter sequence was unchanged, we wondered whether there were other unknown factors downstream of STAT1 activation that prevented IFNγ from activating IDO1 expression in 293 cells. To test this, we constructed a stable derivative of 293 cells, termed 293/p616, containing an episomal IDO1 promoter-luciferase reporter (p616), which is described in the materials and methods section. Luciferase expression in 293/p616 cells was evaluated 24 hours after addition of IFNγ (600 U/ml); experimental results indicate that IFNγ can efficiently induce the IDO1 promoter in these cells. Importantly, the IDO1 promoter used in p616 was cloned from 293 cells. Therefore, although the entire IFNγ-driven signaling cascade required for IDO1 expression is intact and functional in 293 cells, the native 293 IDO1 promoter in its chromosomal context is not activated by this signaling cascade (Figure 5).

bacteriology-parasitology-IDO1-promoter-episomal-reporter

Figure 5: IFNγ induces the IDO1 promoter on an episomal reporter plasmid in 293 cells. A) A map of p616 reporter plasmid used to construct 293/p616 cells. p616 replicates as a stable episome in these cells. B) IFNγ (600 U/ml) was added to 293/p616 for 24 hours after which luciferase expression was evaluated. Expression in indicated as fold-over the expression level observed with untreated cells.

The IDO1 promoter is silenced in 293 cells

Frequently promoters in their chromosomal contexts are epigenetically silenced by methylation at CpG islands [35,36]. Therefore, we tested if CpG methylation underscored the inability of IFNγ to induce IDO1 expression in 293 cells. For this, 293 cells were treated with 5-azacytidine, a well-characterized inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase, for 48 hours [37]. Treated cells were then grown in the absence or presence of IFNγ (600 U/ml) for an additional 24 hours, at which time IDO1 expression was evaluated by immunoblot (Figure 6). Treatment with 5-azacytidine for 48 hours partially rescued induction of IDO1 in 293 cells after addition of IFNγ. Therefore, epigenetic silencing by CpG methylation is one mechanism that underlies the inability of IFNγ to induce IDO1 expression in 293 cells, despite the IFNγ signaling pathway being intact in these cells.

bacteriology-parasitology-IDO1-promoter-epigenetically-modified

Figure 6: IDO1 promoter is epigenetically modified in 293 cells. 293 cells were grown in media containing 8 μM 5-azacytidine for 48 hours, after which cells were treated with 600 U/ml of IFNγ for 24 hours. Cells were harvested, counted and lysed and evaluated for expression of IDO1 by immunoblot. Immunoblots evaluating β- actin expression was used as a loading control. Lane 1: Untreated cells; Lane 2: Cells treated with 5-azacytidine alone; and Lane 3: Cells were treated with 5-azacytidine, followed by 600 U/ml of IFNγ.

Discussion

We wished to elaborate on cell-intrinsic differences that affect the capacity of IFNγ to induce IDO1 expression because the resultant tryptophan depletion is proposed to be a major determinant of natural immunity against C. trachomatis infections [10,11,17]. Our results indicate that cell-intrinsic differences in the capacity of IFNγ to induce STAT1 activation, and epigenetic silencing of the IDO1 promoter, can both operate as mechanisms that block induction of IDO1 expression after exposure to IFNγ.

Understanding these mechanisms and others is of relevance because IFNγ-dependent pathways protect against multiple infectious agents. We note that IFNγ polymorphisms have been extensively reported in the literature [38-40]. Some of these polymorphisms negatively affect the outcome of disease progression, with a prominent example being the outcome of tuberculosis disease [41]. There is substantial amount of research documenting the effects of IFNγ receptor polymorphisms in the outcome of disease progression. IFNγ receptor polymorphisms have been associated with disease outcome of many intracellular pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes , Salmonella typhi , Plasmodium sps and Shigella [42-45].

Allele-specific alterations in the IFNγ-dependent induction of IDO1 are predicted to have a significant effect on the outcome of C. trachomatis infection, because C. trachomatis is a tryptophan auxotroph, and its human host also cannot synthesize this amino acid. Further, tryptophan is rare amino acid in the human proteome. Tryptophan and its metabolites are essential for the biosynthesis of neurotransmitters such as serotonin [46-49]. In this context, we note that IDO1 polymorphisms are associated with other human conditions including major depressive disorder [47,50], and bipolar disorder [50,51]. We note that IDO1 polymorphisms are also associated with Crohn’s disease, a condition that involves interactions between the gut microbiome and the human host [52,53]. The effects of such polymorphisms have not been considered in the context of natural clearance of C. trachomatis infections. There are multiple studies indicating that around 20% of C. trachomatis infected women can naturally clear this infection within a two-week period without antibiotic therapy [54,55]. While this result is encouraging and indicates that anti-chlamydial vaccines can be made, it is important to note that 80% of infected women do not naturally clear infection. Many factors could underlie this failure; our observations indicate that these factors include allele-specific defects in the IFNγ signaling pathway, or the propensity for the IDO1 promoter to be epigenetically silenced.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grant AI095859 (Alison J. Quayle and Ashok Aiyar). The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Timothy P. Foster for his intellectual support and providing various reagents.

References

  1. Schachter J (1978) Chlamydial infections (first of three parts). N Engl J Med 298: 428-435.
  2. Fehlner-Gardiner C, Roshick C, Carlson JH, Hughes S, Belland RJ, et al. (2002) Molecular basis defining human Chlamydia trachomatis tissue tropism. A possible role for tryptophan synthase. J Biol Chem 277: 26893-26903.
  3. Thylefors B (1995) Global trachoma control past, present and future approaches. Rev Int Trach Pathol Ocul Trop SubtropSantePublique 72: 13-80.
  4. Schachter J, Moncada J, Dawson CR, Sheppard J, Courtright P, et al. (1988) Nonculture methods for diagnosing chlamydial infection in patients with trachoma: a clue to the pathogenesis of the disease? J Infect Dis 158: 1347-1352.
  5. Torrone E, Papp J, Weinstock H (2014) Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infections Among Persons Aged 14-39 Years -United States, 2007-2012. CDC 63: 834-838.
  6. Molano M, Meijer CJ, Weiderpass E, Arslan A, Posso H, et al. (2005) The natural course of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Colombian women: a 5-year follow-up study. J Infect Dis 191: 907-916.
  7. Morre SA, van den Brule AJ, Rozendaal L, Boeke AJ, Voorhorst FJ, et al. (2002) The natural course of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections: 45% clearance and no development of clinical PID after one-year follow-up. Int J STD AIDS 2: 12-18.
  8. Darville T, Hiltke TJ (2010) Pathogenesis of genital tract disease due to Chlamydia trachomatis. J Infect Dis 201 2: S114-125.
  9. Abdelrahman YM, Belland RJ (2005) The chlamydial developmental cycle. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 949-959.
  10. Beatty WL, Byrne GI, Morrison RP (1993) Morphologic and antigenic characterization of interferon gamma-mediated persistent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 3998-4002.
  11. Belland RJ, Nelson DE, Virok D, Crane DD, Hogan D, et al. (2003) Transcriptome analysis of chlamydial growth during IFN-gamma-mediated persistence and reactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15971-15976.
  12. Akers JC, Tan M (2006) Molecular mechanism of tryptophan-dependent transcriptional regulation in Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol 188: 4236-4243.
  13. Beatty WL, Belanger TA, Desai AA, Morrison RP, Byrne GI (1994) Tryptophan depletion as a mechanism of gamma interferon-mediated chlamydial persistence. Infect Immun 62: 3705-3711.
  14. Feng GS, Taylor MW (1989) Interferon gamma-resistant mutants are defective in the induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86: 7144-7148.
  15. Schroder K, Hertzog PJ, Ravasi T, Hume DA (2004) Interferon-gamma: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J Leukoc Biol 75: 163-189.
  16. Platten M, Wick W, Van den Eynde BJ (2012) Tryptophan catabolism in cancer: beyond IDO and tryptophan depletion. Cancer Res 72: 5435-5440.
  17. Ibana JA, Belland RJ, Zea AH, Schust DJ, Nagamatsu T, et al. (2011) Inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity by levo-1-methyl tryptophan blocks gamma interferon-induced Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in human epithelial cells. Infect Immun 79: 4425-4437.
  18. Buckner LR, Schust DJ, Ding J, Nagamatsu T, Beatty W, et al. (2011) Innate immune mediator profiles and their regulation in a novel polarized immortalized epithelial cell model derived from human endocervix. J Reprod Immunol 92: 8-20.
  19. Mayer J, Woods ML, Vavrin Z, Hibbs JB Jr. (1993) Gamma interferon-induced nitric oxide production reduces Chlamydia trachomatis infectivity in McCoy cells. Infect Immun 61: 491-497.
  20. Kokab A, Jennings R, Eley A, Pacey AA, Cross NA (2010) Analysis of modulated gene expression in a model of Interferon-gamma-induced persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis in HEp-2 cells. Microb Pathog 49: 217-225.
  21. Kane CD, Byrne GI (1998) Differential effects of gamma interferon on Chlamydia trachomatis growth in polarized and nonpolarized human epithelial cells in culture. Infect Immun 66: 2349-2351.
  22. Lu H, Shen C, Brunham RC (2000) Chlamydia trachomatis infection of epithelial cells induces the activation of caspase-1 and release of mature IL-18. J Immunol 165: 1463-1469.
  23. Shemer Y, Sarov I (1985) Inhibition of growth of Chlamydia trachomatis by human gamma interferon. Infect Immun 48: 592-596.
  24. Shaw AC, Christiansen G, Birkelund S (1999) Effects of interferon gamma on Chlamydia trachomatis serovar A and L2 protein expression investigated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 20: 775-780.
  25. Scherer WF, Syverton JT, Gey GO (1953) Studies on the propagation in vitro of poliomyelitis viruses. IV. Viral multiplication in a stable strain of human malignant epithelial cells (strain HeLa) derived from an epidermoid carcinoma of the cervix. J Exp Med 97: 695-710.
  26. Graham FL, Smiley J, Russell WC, Nairn R (1977) Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5. J Gen Virol 36: 59-74.
  27. Yee C, Krishnan-Hewlett I, Baker CC, Schlegel R, Howley PM (1985) Presence and expression of human papillomavirus sequences in human cervical carcinoma cell lines. Am J Pathol 119: 361-366.
  28. Auersperg N (1964) Long-Term Cultivation of Hypodiploid Human Tumor Cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 32: 135-163.
  29. Sears J, Kolman J, Wahl GM, Aiyar A (2003) Metaphase chromosome tethering is necessary for the DNA synthesis and maintenance of oriP plasmids but is insufficient for transcription activation by Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1. J Virol 77: 11767-11780.
  30. Ibana JA, Schust DJ, Sugimoto J, Nagamatsu T, Greene SJ, et al. (2011) Chlamydia trachomatis immune evasion via downregulation of MHC class I surface expression involves direct and indirect mechanisms. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2011: 420905.
  31. Haan KM, Aiyar A, Longnecker R (2001) Establishment of latent Epstein-Barr virus infection and stable episomal maintenance in murine B-cell lines. J Virol 75: 3016-3020.
  32. Gahn TA, Schildkraut CL (1989) The Epstein-Barr virus origin of plasmid replication, oriP, contains both the initiation and termination sites of DNA replication. Cell 58: 527-535.
  33. Aras S, Singh G, Johnston K, Foster T, Aiyar A (2009) Zinc coordination is required for and regulates transcription activation by Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000469.
  34. Ludbrook J (1995) Microcomputer statistics packages for biomedical scientists. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 22: 976-986.
  35. Baylin SB (2005) DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2 Suppl 1: S4-11.
  36. Rottach A, Leonhardt H, Spada F (2009) DNA methylation-mediated epigenetic control. J Cell Biochem 108: 43-51.
  37. Christman JK (2002) 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene 21: 5483-5495.
  38. Goris A, Epplen C, Fiten P, Andersson M, Murru R, et al. (1999) Analysis of an IFN-gamma gene (IFNG) polymorphism in multiple sclerosis in Europe: effect of population structure on association with disease. J Interferon Cytokine Res 19: 1037-1046.
  39. Kantarci OH, Goris A, Hebrink DD, Heggarty S, Cunningham S, et al. (2005) IFNG polymorphisms are associated with gender differences in susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Genes Immun 6: 153-161.
  40. Bream JH, Ping A, Zhang X, Winkler C, Young HA (2002) A single nucleotide polymorphism in the proximal IFN-gamma promoter alters control of gene transcription. Genes Immun 3: 165-169.
  41. Hwang JH, Kim EJ, Koh WJ, Kim SY, Lee SH, et al. (2007) Polymorphisms of interferon-gamma and interferon-gamma receptor 1 genes and non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung diseases. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 87: 166-171.
  42. Dussurget O, Bierne H, Cossart P (2014) The bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes and the interferon family: type I, type II and type III interferons. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4: 50.
  43. Muotiala A, Makela PH (1990) The role of IFN-gamma in murine Salmonella typhimurium infection. Microb Pathog 8: 135-141.
  44. Bao S, Beagley KW, France MP, Shen J, Husband AJ (2000) Interferon-gamma plays a critical role in intestinal immunity against Salmonella typhimurium infection. Immunology 99: 464-472.
  45. Koch O, Rockett K, Jallow M, Pinder M, Sisay-Joof F, et al. (2005) Investigation of malaria susceptibility determinants in the IFNG/IL26/IL22 genomic region. Genes Immun 6: 312-318.
  46. Canli T (2014) Reconceptualizing major depressive disorder as an infectious disease. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord 4: 10.
  47. De Ravin SS, Zarember KA, Long-Priel D, Chan KC, Fox SD, et al. (2010) Tryptophan/kynurenine metabolism in human leukocytes is independent of superoxide and is fully maintained in chronic granulomatous disease. Blood 116: 1755-1760.
  48. Geisler WM (2010) Duration of untreated, uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and factors associated with chlamydia resolution: a review of human studies. J Infect Dis 2: S104-113.
  49. Geisler WM, Lensing SY, Press CG, Hook EW 3rd (2013) Spontaneous resolution of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and protection from reinfection. J Infect Dis 207: 1850-1856.
  50. Smith AK, Simon JS, Gustafson EL, Noviello S, Cubells JF, et al. (2012) Association of a polymorphism in the indoleamine- 2,3-dioxygenase gene and interferon-alpha-induced depression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Mol Psychiatry 17: 781-789.
  51. Cutler JA, Rush AJ, McMahon FJ, Laje G (2012) Common genetic variation in the indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase genes and antidepressant treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. J Psychopharmacol 26: 360-367.
  52. Knights D, Lassen KG, Xavier RJ (2013) Advances in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: linking host genetics and the microbiome. Gut 62: 1505-1510.
  53. Gkouskou KK, Deligianni C, Tsatsanis C, Eliopoulos AG (2014) The gut microbiota in mouse models of inflammatory bowel disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4: 28.
  54. Parks KS, Dixon PB, Richey CM, Hook EW 3rd (1997) Spontaneous clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in untreated patients. Sex Transm Dis 24: 229-235.
  55. Golden MR, Schillinger JA, Markowitz L, St Louis ME (2000) Duration of untreated genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis 27: 329-337.
Citation: Sherchand S, Ibana JA, Quayle AJ, Aiyar A (2016) Cell Intrinsic Factors Modulate the Effects of IFNγ on the Development of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Bacteriol Parasitol 7:282.

Copyright: © 2016 Sherchand S, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.